Could predatory pricing rules substitute for antidumping laws in the proposed China-Japan-Korea free trade agreement?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The proliferation of trade agreements heightens the interest in predatory pricing rules because of their possibility to replace antidumping laws. Successful practices have already been achieved in several regional trade agreements. The current paper focuses on the proposed China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CJK FTA) and argues that substitution may be complicated by the presence of two different forms of predatory pricing: dominance-orientated predatory pricing and unfair predatory pricing. Reviewing the rules of the former fortifies the evidence that specific rules of competition law can substitute antidumping law. However, by exploring the rules of the latter, this conclusion is troubled. Unfair predatory pricing rules, as they exist in China, Japan, and Korea, are prone to protectionist abuse. Hence, efforts to harmonize predatory pricing rules so as to abolish antidumping laws would confront more difficulties in the proposed CJK FTA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-192
Number of pages30
JournalSocial Science Japan Journal
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

free trade
Korea
pricing
Japan
China
Law
rules of competition
substitution
proliferation
abuse
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{998df7ddaf83441caf3e8e6692274541,
title = "Could predatory pricing rules substitute for antidumping laws in the proposed China-Japan-Korea free trade agreement?",
abstract = "The proliferation of trade agreements heightens the interest in predatory pricing rules because of their possibility to replace antidumping laws. Successful practices have already been achieved in several regional trade agreements. The current paper focuses on the proposed China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CJK FTA) and argues that substitution may be complicated by the presence of two different forms of predatory pricing: dominance-orientated predatory pricing and unfair predatory pricing. Reviewing the rules of the former fortifies the evidence that specific rules of competition law can substitute antidumping law. However, by exploring the rules of the latter, this conclusion is troubled. Unfair predatory pricing rules, as they exist in China, Japan, and Korea, are prone to protectionist abuse. Hence, efforts to harmonize predatory pricing rules so as to abolish antidumping laws would confront more difficulties in the proposed CJK FTA.",
author = "Ying Bi and {Van Uytsel}, {Steven J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ssjj/jyv010",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "163--192",
journal = "Social Science Japan Journal",
issn = "1369-1465",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could predatory pricing rules substitute for antidumping laws in the proposed China-Japan-Korea free trade agreement?

AU - Bi, Ying

AU - Van Uytsel, Steven J.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The proliferation of trade agreements heightens the interest in predatory pricing rules because of their possibility to replace antidumping laws. Successful practices have already been achieved in several regional trade agreements. The current paper focuses on the proposed China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CJK FTA) and argues that substitution may be complicated by the presence of two different forms of predatory pricing: dominance-orientated predatory pricing and unfair predatory pricing. Reviewing the rules of the former fortifies the evidence that specific rules of competition law can substitute antidumping law. However, by exploring the rules of the latter, this conclusion is troubled. Unfair predatory pricing rules, as they exist in China, Japan, and Korea, are prone to protectionist abuse. Hence, efforts to harmonize predatory pricing rules so as to abolish antidumping laws would confront more difficulties in the proposed CJK FTA.

AB - The proliferation of trade agreements heightens the interest in predatory pricing rules because of their possibility to replace antidumping laws. Successful practices have already been achieved in several regional trade agreements. The current paper focuses on the proposed China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CJK FTA) and argues that substitution may be complicated by the presence of two different forms of predatory pricing: dominance-orientated predatory pricing and unfair predatory pricing. Reviewing the rules of the former fortifies the evidence that specific rules of competition law can substitute antidumping law. However, by exploring the rules of the latter, this conclusion is troubled. Unfair predatory pricing rules, as they exist in China, Japan, and Korea, are prone to protectionist abuse. Hence, efforts to harmonize predatory pricing rules so as to abolish antidumping laws would confront more difficulties in the proposed CJK FTA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939503111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939503111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ssjj/jyv010

DO - 10.1093/ssjj/jyv010

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 163

EP - 192

JO - Social Science Japan Journal

JF - Social Science Japan Journal

SN - 1369-1465

IS - 2

ER -