Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment: Japan-Europe-North American study

Toshi A. Furukawa, D. L. Streiner, H. Azuma, T. Higuchi, K. Kamijima, Shigenobu Kanba, N. Ozaki, A. Aoba, M. Murasaki, S. Miura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Worldwide use of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) presupposes that depression symptomatology can be measured the same way across countries but no empirical study has yet examined this issue. We therefore examined cross-cultural consistency of factor structure of HRSD. Method: A 17-item HRSD data were sought for 5185 individuals diagnosed with major depression in Japan, Europe and North America. Candidate factor structures were obtained with simultaneous component analysis (SCA) across the three cultures. They were then submitted to multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: According to SCA, 3-, 4- or 5-factor solutions were found to optimally and adequately summarize the variables for all the three populations. When submitted to CFA, the 5-factor solution was the best fitting and the most parsimonious: they were 'anhedonia/retardation,' 'guilt/agitation,' 'bodily symptoms,' 'insomnia' and 'appetite.' Conclusion: Common underlying factors exist for HRSD among Japanese, European and American patients with major depression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-285
Number of pages7
JournalActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Volume112
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2005

Fingerprint

Japan
Depression
Statistical Factor Analysis
Anhedonia
A 17
Guilt
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Appetite
North America
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Furukawa, T. A., Streiner, D. L., Azuma, H., Higuchi, T., Kamijima, K., Kanba, S., ... Miura, S. (2005). Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment: Japan-Europe-North American study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(4), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00587.x

Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment : Japan-Europe-North American study. / Furukawa, Toshi A.; Streiner, D. L.; Azuma, H.; Higuchi, T.; Kamijima, K.; Kanba, Shigenobu; Ozaki, N.; Aoba, A.; Murasaki, M.; Miura, S.

In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 112, No. 4, 01.10.2005, p. 279-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Furukawa, TA, Streiner, DL, Azuma, H, Higuchi, T, Kamijima, K, Kanba, S, Ozaki, N, Aoba, A, Murasaki, M & Miura, S 2005, 'Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment: Japan-Europe-North American study', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00587.x
Furukawa, Toshi A. ; Streiner, D. L. ; Azuma, H. ; Higuchi, T. ; Kamijima, K. ; Kanba, Shigenobu ; Ozaki, N. ; Aoba, A. ; Murasaki, M. ; Miura, S. / Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment : Japan-Europe-North American study. In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2005 ; Vol. 112, No. 4. pp. 279-285.
@article{f6913e238a564237a6262ea1077674ee,
title = "Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment: Japan-Europe-North American study",
abstract = "Objective: Worldwide use of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) presupposes that depression symptomatology can be measured the same way across countries but no empirical study has yet examined this issue. We therefore examined cross-cultural consistency of factor structure of HRSD. Method: A 17-item HRSD data were sought for 5185 individuals diagnosed with major depression in Japan, Europe and North America. Candidate factor structures were obtained with simultaneous component analysis (SCA) across the three cultures. They were then submitted to multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: According to SCA, 3-, 4- or 5-factor solutions were found to optimally and adequately summarize the variables for all the three populations. When submitted to CFA, the 5-factor solution was the best fitting and the most parsimonious: they were 'anhedonia/retardation,' 'guilt/agitation,' 'bodily symptoms,' 'insomnia' and 'appetite.' Conclusion: Common underlying factors exist for HRSD among Japanese, European and American patients with major depression.",
author = "Furukawa, {Toshi A.} and Streiner, {D. L.} and H. Azuma and T. Higuchi and K. Kamijima and Shigenobu Kanba and N. Ozaki and A. Aoba and M. Murasaki and S. Miura",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00587.x",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "279--285",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment

T2 - Japan-Europe-North American study

AU - Furukawa, Toshi A.

AU - Streiner, D. L.

AU - Azuma, H.

AU - Higuchi, T.

AU - Kamijima, K.

AU - Kanba, Shigenobu

AU - Ozaki, N.

AU - Aoba, A.

AU - Murasaki, M.

AU - Miura, S.

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - Objective: Worldwide use of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) presupposes that depression symptomatology can be measured the same way across countries but no empirical study has yet examined this issue. We therefore examined cross-cultural consistency of factor structure of HRSD. Method: A 17-item HRSD data were sought for 5185 individuals diagnosed with major depression in Japan, Europe and North America. Candidate factor structures were obtained with simultaneous component analysis (SCA) across the three cultures. They were then submitted to multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: According to SCA, 3-, 4- or 5-factor solutions were found to optimally and adequately summarize the variables for all the three populations. When submitted to CFA, the 5-factor solution was the best fitting and the most parsimonious: they were 'anhedonia/retardation,' 'guilt/agitation,' 'bodily symptoms,' 'insomnia' and 'appetite.' Conclusion: Common underlying factors exist for HRSD among Japanese, European and American patients with major depression.

AB - Objective: Worldwide use of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) presupposes that depression symptomatology can be measured the same way across countries but no empirical study has yet examined this issue. We therefore examined cross-cultural consistency of factor structure of HRSD. Method: A 17-item HRSD data were sought for 5185 individuals diagnosed with major depression in Japan, Europe and North America. Candidate factor structures were obtained with simultaneous component analysis (SCA) across the three cultures. They were then submitted to multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: According to SCA, 3-, 4- or 5-factor solutions were found to optimally and adequately summarize the variables for all the three populations. When submitted to CFA, the 5-factor solution was the best fitting and the most parsimonious: they were 'anhedonia/retardation,' 'guilt/agitation,' 'bodily symptoms,' 'insomnia' and 'appetite.' Conclusion: Common underlying factors exist for HRSD among Japanese, European and American patients with major depression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25644459284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25644459284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00587.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00587.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16156835

AN - SCOPUS:25644459284

VL - 112

SP - 279

EP - 285

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 4

ER -