Current status of site-specific cancer registry system for the clinical researches: aiming for future contribution by the assessment of present medical care

Koichi Hirata, Masafumi Imamura, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara, Tsuguya Fukui, Toshiharu Furukawa, Mitsukazu Gotoh, Kenichi Hakamada, Megumi Ishiguro, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hiroyuki Konno, Hiroaki Miyata, Masaki Mori, Kenji Okita, Masami Sato, Akiko Shibata, Ichiro Takemasa, Michiaki Unno, Kohei Yokoi, Toshihiko Nishidate, Masahiko Nishiyama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The current status of site-specific cancer registry has not been elucidated, but sufficient system is found in some societies. The purpose of this study was to clear the present condition of site-specific cancer registries in Japan and to suggest for the improvement. Methods: The questionnaire was conducted by the study group of the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. It consisted of 38 questions, conflicts of interest, clinical research method, informed consent and funding for registry. We distributed this questionnaire to 28 academic societies, which had published the clinical practice guideline(s) assessed under Medical Information Network Distribution Service (MINDS). Results: The concept of the importance in assessment for medical quality by the data of the site-specific cancer registry was in good consensus. But the number of the society with the mature registry was limited. The whole-year registry with the scientific researches in the National Clinical Database (NCD) and in the Translational Research Informatics Center (TRI) might seem to be in success, because assured enhancement may be estimated. Now, academic societies have the structural factors, i.e., the financial limitation in the registry maintenance and the data analysis, and in the difficulty of employment of the researchers with skill and talent. Conclusions: To manage the site-specific cancer registry effectively, the scientific registry system will be essentially important. Each academic society had much experienced highly qualified clinical researches in past. Accordingly, the scientific suggestion and co-operation should be of great importance for the improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1161-1168
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 13 2019

Fingerprint

Registries
Research
Neoplasms
Conflict of Interest
Informatics
Aptitude
Translational Medical Research
Information Services
Information Dissemination
Informed Consent
Practice Guidelines
Consensus
Japan
Maintenance
Research Personnel
Databases
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Current status of site-specific cancer registry system for the clinical researches : aiming for future contribution by the assessment of present medical care. / Hirata, Koichi; Imamura, Masafumi; Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi; Fukui, Tsuguya; Furukawa, Toshiharu; Gotoh, Mitsukazu; Hakamada, Kenichi; Ishiguro, Megumi; Kakeji, Yoshihiro; Konno, Hiroyuki; Miyata, Hiroaki; Mori, Masaki; Okita, Kenji; Sato, Masami; Shibata, Akiko; Takemasa, Ichiro; Unno, Michiaki; Yokoi, Kohei; Nishidate, Toshihiko; Nishiyama, Masahiko.

In: International Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 24, No. 9, 13.09.2019, p. 1161-1168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirata, K, Imamura, M, Fujiwara, T, Fukui, T, Furukawa, T, Gotoh, M, Hakamada, K, Ishiguro, M, Kakeji, Y, Konno, H, Miyata, H, Mori, M, Okita, K, Sato, M, Shibata, A, Takemasa, I, Unno, M, Yokoi, K, Nishidate, T & Nishiyama, M 2019, 'Current status of site-specific cancer registry system for the clinical researches: aiming for future contribution by the assessment of present medical care', International Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1161-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01434-w
Hirata, Koichi ; Imamura, Masafumi ; Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi ; Fukui, Tsuguya ; Furukawa, Toshiharu ; Gotoh, Mitsukazu ; Hakamada, Kenichi ; Ishiguro, Megumi ; Kakeji, Yoshihiro ; Konno, Hiroyuki ; Miyata, Hiroaki ; Mori, Masaki ; Okita, Kenji ; Sato, Masami ; Shibata, Akiko ; Takemasa, Ichiro ; Unno, Michiaki ; Yokoi, Kohei ; Nishidate, Toshihiko ; Nishiyama, Masahiko. / Current status of site-specific cancer registry system for the clinical researches : aiming for future contribution by the assessment of present medical care. In: International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 1161-1168.
@article{cb1f2ed0667b4458970201d82bb22c6c,
title = "Current status of site-specific cancer registry system for the clinical researches: aiming for future contribution by the assessment of present medical care",
abstract = "Background: The current status of site-specific cancer registry has not been elucidated, but sufficient system is found in some societies. The purpose of this study was to clear the present condition of site-specific cancer registries in Japan and to suggest for the improvement. Methods: The questionnaire was conducted by the study group of the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. It consisted of 38 questions, conflicts of interest, clinical research method, informed consent and funding for registry. We distributed this questionnaire to 28 academic societies, which had published the clinical practice guideline(s) assessed under Medical Information Network Distribution Service (MINDS). Results: The concept of the importance in assessment for medical quality by the data of the site-specific cancer registry was in good consensus. But the number of the society with the mature registry was limited. The whole-year registry with the scientific researches in the National Clinical Database (NCD) and in the Translational Research Informatics Center (TRI) might seem to be in success, because assured enhancement may be estimated. Now, academic societies have the structural factors, i.e., the financial limitation in the registry maintenance and the data analysis, and in the difficulty of employment of the researchers with skill and talent. Conclusions: To manage the site-specific cancer registry effectively, the scientific registry system will be essentially important. Each academic society had much experienced highly qualified clinical researches in past. Accordingly, the scientific suggestion and co-operation should be of great importance for the improvement.",
author = "Koichi Hirata and Masafumi Imamura and Toshiyoshi Fujiwara and Tsuguya Fukui and Toshiharu Furukawa and Mitsukazu Gotoh and Kenichi Hakamada and Megumi Ishiguro and Yoshihiro Kakeji and Hiroyuki Konno and Hiroaki Miyata and Masaki Mori and Kenji Okita and Masami Sato and Akiko Shibata and Ichiro Takemasa and Michiaki Unno and Kohei Yokoi and Toshihiko Nishidate and Masahiko Nishiyama",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s10147-019-01434-w",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1161--1168",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "1341-9625",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status of site-specific cancer registry system for the clinical researches

T2 - aiming for future contribution by the assessment of present medical care

AU - Hirata, Koichi

AU - Imamura, Masafumi

AU - Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi

AU - Fukui, Tsuguya

AU - Furukawa, Toshiharu

AU - Gotoh, Mitsukazu

AU - Hakamada, Kenichi

AU - Ishiguro, Megumi

AU - Kakeji, Yoshihiro

AU - Konno, Hiroyuki

AU - Miyata, Hiroaki

AU - Mori, Masaki

AU - Okita, Kenji

AU - Sato, Masami

AU - Shibata, Akiko

AU - Takemasa, Ichiro

AU - Unno, Michiaki

AU - Yokoi, Kohei

AU - Nishidate, Toshihiko

AU - Nishiyama, Masahiko

PY - 2019/9/13

Y1 - 2019/9/13

N2 - Background: The current status of site-specific cancer registry has not been elucidated, but sufficient system is found in some societies. The purpose of this study was to clear the present condition of site-specific cancer registries in Japan and to suggest for the improvement. Methods: The questionnaire was conducted by the study group of the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. It consisted of 38 questions, conflicts of interest, clinical research method, informed consent and funding for registry. We distributed this questionnaire to 28 academic societies, which had published the clinical practice guideline(s) assessed under Medical Information Network Distribution Service (MINDS). Results: The concept of the importance in assessment for medical quality by the data of the site-specific cancer registry was in good consensus. But the number of the society with the mature registry was limited. The whole-year registry with the scientific researches in the National Clinical Database (NCD) and in the Translational Research Informatics Center (TRI) might seem to be in success, because assured enhancement may be estimated. Now, academic societies have the structural factors, i.e., the financial limitation in the registry maintenance and the data analysis, and in the difficulty of employment of the researchers with skill and talent. Conclusions: To manage the site-specific cancer registry effectively, the scientific registry system will be essentially important. Each academic society had much experienced highly qualified clinical researches in past. Accordingly, the scientific suggestion and co-operation should be of great importance for the improvement.

AB - Background: The current status of site-specific cancer registry has not been elucidated, but sufficient system is found in some societies. The purpose of this study was to clear the present condition of site-specific cancer registries in Japan and to suggest for the improvement. Methods: The questionnaire was conducted by the study group of the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. It consisted of 38 questions, conflicts of interest, clinical research method, informed consent and funding for registry. We distributed this questionnaire to 28 academic societies, which had published the clinical practice guideline(s) assessed under Medical Information Network Distribution Service (MINDS). Results: The concept of the importance in assessment for medical quality by the data of the site-specific cancer registry was in good consensus. But the number of the society with the mature registry was limited. The whole-year registry with the scientific researches in the National Clinical Database (NCD) and in the Translational Research Informatics Center (TRI) might seem to be in success, because assured enhancement may be estimated. Now, academic societies have the structural factors, i.e., the financial limitation in the registry maintenance and the data analysis, and in the difficulty of employment of the researchers with skill and talent. Conclusions: To manage the site-specific cancer registry effectively, the scientific registry system will be essentially important. Each academic society had much experienced highly qualified clinical researches in past. Accordingly, the scientific suggestion and co-operation should be of great importance for the improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064716064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064716064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10147-019-01434-w

DO - 10.1007/s10147-019-01434-w

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064716064

VL - 24

SP - 1161

EP - 1168

JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 1341-9625

IS - 9

ER -