TY - JOUR
T1 - Danaparoid as the prophylaxis for hepatic veno-occlusive disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in childhood hematological malignancy
AU - Sakaguchi, Hirotoshi
AU - Watanabe, Nobuhiro
AU - Muramatsu, Hideki
AU - Doisaki, Sayoko
AU - Yoshida, Nao
AU - Matsumoto, Kimikazu
AU - Kato, Koji
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Background: Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a regimen-related toxicity that occurs in the early phase of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therapeutic modalities for established VOD are limited, and severe VOD characterized by multiple organ failure is associated with a fatal prognosis despite intensive supportive care. Procedure: We analyzed the data of 95 consecutive allogeneic HSCT for childhood hematological malignancies, and assessed the efficacy of our VOD prophylaxis regimen based on danaparoid (n = 48), comparing with historical control regimen based on dalteparin (n = 47). Results: Eight patients (danaparoid cohort in one; dalteparin cohort in seven) developed VOD on day +30 (median onset, day +22; range, day +11 to day +28) after HSCT. The probability of developing VOD for the danaparoid cohort was 2% (95% CI, 0-6%) and that of the dalteparin cohort was 15% (95% CI, 5-26%). In the Cox hazard proportional model, the danaparoid cohort had a significant advantage over the dalteparin cohort for the prophylaxis of VOD (hazard ratio (HR), 0.0; 95% CI, 0.0-0.3; P < 0.01) without increasing hemorrhagic events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that danaparoid may have promise for the prophylaxis of VOD after allogeneic HSCT and further randomized studies are warranted.
AB - Background: Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a regimen-related toxicity that occurs in the early phase of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therapeutic modalities for established VOD are limited, and severe VOD characterized by multiple organ failure is associated with a fatal prognosis despite intensive supportive care. Procedure: We analyzed the data of 95 consecutive allogeneic HSCT for childhood hematological malignancies, and assessed the efficacy of our VOD prophylaxis regimen based on danaparoid (n = 48), comparing with historical control regimen based on dalteparin (n = 47). Results: Eight patients (danaparoid cohort in one; dalteparin cohort in seven) developed VOD on day +30 (median onset, day +22; range, day +11 to day +28) after HSCT. The probability of developing VOD for the danaparoid cohort was 2% (95% CI, 0-6%) and that of the dalteparin cohort was 15% (95% CI, 5-26%). In the Cox hazard proportional model, the danaparoid cohort had a significant advantage over the dalteparin cohort for the prophylaxis of VOD (hazard ratio (HR), 0.0; 95% CI, 0.0-0.3; P < 0.01) without increasing hemorrhagic events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that danaparoid may have promise for the prophylaxis of VOD after allogeneic HSCT and further randomized studies are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958521968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958521968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pbc.22645
DO - 10.1002/pbc.22645
M3 - Article
C2 - 20589662
AN - SCOPUS:77958521968
SN - 1545-5009
VL - 55
SP - 1118
EP - 1125
JO - Medical and Pediatric Oncology
JF - Medical and Pediatric Oncology
IS - 6
ER -