TY - JOUR
T1 - Description, redescription and revision of sixteen putatively closely related species of Echinoderes (kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida), with the proposition of a new species group - the Echinoderes dujardinii group
AU - Sørensen, Martin V.
AU - Goetz, Freya E.
AU - Herranz, María
AU - Chang, Cheon Young
AU - Chatterjee, Tapas
AU - Durucan, Furkan
AU - Neves, Ricardo C.
AU - Yildiz, N. Özlem
AU - Norenburg, Jon
AU - Yamasaki, Hiroshi
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology, Coconut Island, Oahu, for hosting the MarineGEO Hawaii Biodiversity Assessment Workshop in 2017. We also thank the Invertebrate Collection of the Hokkaido University Museum, the Natural History Museum of Ewha Woman’s University, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, the Swedish Museum of Natural History, and the F. Pardos lab at the Complutense University of Madrid for loaning specimens for the study. RCN and MH dedicate their sampling efforts in Faro, Portugal, to the memory of Prof. Dr Heinrich Reichert, who financially supported the field trip to Faro; they furthermore send their thanks to the staff from CCMAR (University of Algarve, Portugal). NÖY sends her thanks to the Dr S. Karaytuğ lab at Mersin University, Turkey, for their help with the Aegean Sea sampling, HY thanks Dr B. Neuhaus for his help loaning the E. pilosus type material, and MVS sends special thanks to Kathryn Ahlfeld for handling the large loans from the Smithsonian Institution, and for patiently extending these loans. Molecular work at the Smithsonian Institution was supported by the Global Genome Initiative under Award No. GGI-Partnership-2017-159b and performed at the Laboratory of Analytical Biology of the National Museum of Natural History. Sampling was supported by numerous sponsors and funding agencies: Hawaii sampling: The Castle Foundation, Matthew Frank Foundation, The Zilber Family Foundation, The Tennenbaum Marine Observatory Network and Global Genome Initiative (two latter via the Smithsonian Institution); Korea sampling to CYC: National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) 2011 grant, “Discovery of indigenous species from Korea”; Faro, Portugal sampling to RCN and MH: ASSEMBLE Grant No. 227799; Tanabe Bay, Japan sampling to HY: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant (23370038); Tanegashima, Japan sampling to HY: University of the Ryukyus Strategic Research Promotion Grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/30
Y1 - 2020/12/30
N2 - Thirteen species of Echinoderes with nearly identical spine/tube patterns, and apparently similar tergal extensions were re-examined and compared. Based on this, redescriptions and/or emended species diagnoses are provided for Echinoderes aureus, E. dujardinii, E. gerardi, E. imperforatus, E. pacificus, E. pilosus, E. sensibilis, E. sublicarum and E. worthingi, and new details about cuticular structures are added for E. kozloffi and E. gizoensis. The new information derived from the redescriptions, and the subsequent comparative studies revealed that: 1) the holotype of Echinoderes lanceolatus is identical with the types of Echinoderes aureus, and E. lanceolatus is thus a junior synonym of E. aureus; other potentially synonymous species that should be addressed further in the future include: E. dujardinii + E. gerardi; E. imperforatus + E. sensibilis, and E. pacificus + E. sublicarum; 2) the paratypes of E. lanceolatus represented a different yet undescribed species, here described as E. songae Sørensen & Chang sp. nov.; 3) a comparison with literature information about E. ehlersi showed that the species is so insufficiently described that a redescription of topotype material is required before the species should be considered for taxonomic comparison; 4) specimens from the Andaman Islands, India, that previously have been reported as Echinoderes cf. ehlersi represent two different undescribed species, of which one is described as E. chandrasekharai Sørensen & Chatterjee sp. nov. and the other is left undescribed due to the limited material available; 5) out of a total of fifteen addressed species, it is proposed that eleven represent a putatively monophyletic group that is named the Echinoderes dujardinii group. The group includes following species: E. dujardinii, E. ehlersi, E. gerardi, E. imperforatus, E. kozloffi, E. sensibilis, E. pacificus, E. sublicarum, E. songae Sørensen & Chang sp. nov., E. chandrasekharai Sørensen & Chatterjee sp. nov., and Echinoderes sp. from the Andaman Islands, and is supported by a similar spine/tube pattern (except for variation regarding the presence of lateral accessory tubes on segment 8); generally short middorsal spines, especially on segments 4 to 6; glandular cell outlets type 1 always present in middorsal positions on segments 1 to 3, and in subdorsal positions on segments 4 to 9; glandular cell outlets type 2 always present in laterodorsal or midlateral positions on segment 8, and sometimes in same positions on segment 9 but never at any other segments or positions; female papillae always present on sternal plates of segments 7 and 8, and occasionally also on segment 6; tergal extensions well-spaced, triangular, gradually tapered cones, and pectinate fringes of sternal extensions are differentiated into seta-like tufts. The comparisons furthermore showed potential taxonomic significance of two echinoderid character traits that previously have been slightly neglected as diagnostic traits, namely the presence and appearance of female papillae, and the dorsal pattern of glandular cell outlets type 1. Female papillae may occur on the sternal plates of segments 6 to 8, but the positions may differ from ventrolateral to ventromedial, and the morphology of the intracuticular substructure also differ at species level. Information about position and morphology of female papillae proved helpful for species recognition, but it might also provide information of phylogenetic importance. Analyses of glandular cell outlet type 1 patterns on the dorsal sides of segments 1 to 9 in species of Echinoderidae, revealed several apparently unique or rare patterns, but also three distinct patterns that applied to larger groups of species. One pattern is the one present in all species of the E. dujardinii group, whereas the other two common patterns included 1) middorsal outlets on segments 1 to 3, and paradorsal outlets on segments 4 to 9 (found in 27 species), and 2) middorsal outlets on segments 1 to 3, 5 and 7, and paradorsal outlets on segments 4, 6 and 8 to 9 (found in 27 species).
AB - Thirteen species of Echinoderes with nearly identical spine/tube patterns, and apparently similar tergal extensions were re-examined and compared. Based on this, redescriptions and/or emended species diagnoses are provided for Echinoderes aureus, E. dujardinii, E. gerardi, E. imperforatus, E. pacificus, E. pilosus, E. sensibilis, E. sublicarum and E. worthingi, and new details about cuticular structures are added for E. kozloffi and E. gizoensis. The new information derived from the redescriptions, and the subsequent comparative studies revealed that: 1) the holotype of Echinoderes lanceolatus is identical with the types of Echinoderes aureus, and E. lanceolatus is thus a junior synonym of E. aureus; other potentially synonymous species that should be addressed further in the future include: E. dujardinii + E. gerardi; E. imperforatus + E. sensibilis, and E. pacificus + E. sublicarum; 2) the paratypes of E. lanceolatus represented a different yet undescribed species, here described as E. songae Sørensen & Chang sp. nov.; 3) a comparison with literature information about E. ehlersi showed that the species is so insufficiently described that a redescription of topotype material is required before the species should be considered for taxonomic comparison; 4) specimens from the Andaman Islands, India, that previously have been reported as Echinoderes cf. ehlersi represent two different undescribed species, of which one is described as E. chandrasekharai Sørensen & Chatterjee sp. nov. and the other is left undescribed due to the limited material available; 5) out of a total of fifteen addressed species, it is proposed that eleven represent a putatively monophyletic group that is named the Echinoderes dujardinii group. The group includes following species: E. dujardinii, E. ehlersi, E. gerardi, E. imperforatus, E. kozloffi, E. sensibilis, E. pacificus, E. sublicarum, E. songae Sørensen & Chang sp. nov., E. chandrasekharai Sørensen & Chatterjee sp. nov., and Echinoderes sp. from the Andaman Islands, and is supported by a similar spine/tube pattern (except for variation regarding the presence of lateral accessory tubes on segment 8); generally short middorsal spines, especially on segments 4 to 6; glandular cell outlets type 1 always present in middorsal positions on segments 1 to 3, and in subdorsal positions on segments 4 to 9; glandular cell outlets type 2 always present in laterodorsal or midlateral positions on segment 8, and sometimes in same positions on segment 9 but never at any other segments or positions; female papillae always present on sternal plates of segments 7 and 8, and occasionally also on segment 6; tergal extensions well-spaced, triangular, gradually tapered cones, and pectinate fringes of sternal extensions are differentiated into seta-like tufts. The comparisons furthermore showed potential taxonomic significance of two echinoderid character traits that previously have been slightly neglected as diagnostic traits, namely the presence and appearance of female papillae, and the dorsal pattern of glandular cell outlets type 1. Female papillae may occur on the sternal plates of segments 6 to 8, but the positions may differ from ventrolateral to ventromedial, and the morphology of the intracuticular substructure also differ at species level. Information about position and morphology of female papillae proved helpful for species recognition, but it might also provide information of phylogenetic importance. Analyses of glandular cell outlet type 1 patterns on the dorsal sides of segments 1 to 9 in species of Echinoderidae, revealed several apparently unique or rare patterns, but also three distinct patterns that applied to larger groups of species. One pattern is the one present in all species of the E. dujardinii group, whereas the other two common patterns included 1) middorsal outlets on segments 1 to 3, and paradorsal outlets on segments 4 to 9 (found in 27 species), and 2) middorsal outlets on segments 1 to 3, 5 and 7, and paradorsal outlets on segments 4, 6 and 8 to 9 (found in 27 species).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100732535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100732535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5852/ejt.2020.730.1197
DO - 10.5852/ejt.2020.730.1197
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100732535
SN - 1781-1104
VL - 2020
SP - 1
EP - 101
JO - European Journal of Taxonomy
JF - European Journal of Taxonomy
IS - 730
ER -