Development and validation of a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer in a general Japanese population

Masahiro Iida, Fumie Ikeda, Jun Hata, Yoichiro Hirakawa, Tomoyuki Ohara, Naoko Mukai, Daigo Yoshida, Koji Yonemoto, Motohiro Esaki, Takanari Kitazono, Yutaka Kiyohara, Toshiharu Ninomiya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There have been very few reports of risk score models for the development of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk assessment tool for discerning future gastric cancer risk in Japanese. Methods: A total of 2444 subjects aged 40 years or over were followed up for 14 years from 1988 (derivation cohort), and 3204 subjects of the same age group were followed up for 5 years from 2002 (validation cohort). The weighting (risk score) of each risk factor for predicting future gastric cancer in the risk assessment tool was determined based on the coefficients of a Cox proportional hazards model in the derivation cohort. The goodness of fit of the established risk assessment tool was assessed using the c-statistic and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the validation cohort. Results: During the follow-up, gastric cancer developed in 90 subjects in the derivation cohort and 35 subjects in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, the risk prediction model for gastric cancer was established using significant risk factors: age, sex, the combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen status, hemoglobin A1c level, and smoking status. The incidence of gastric cancer increased significantly as the sum of risk scores increased (P trend < 0.001). The risk assessment tool was validated internally and showed good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.76) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P = 0.43) in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We developed a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer that provides a useful guide for stratifying an individual’s risk of future gastric cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-390
Number of pages8
JournalGastric Cancer
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Stomach Neoplasms
Population
Pepsinogen A
Proportional Hazards Models
Helicobacter pylori
Calibration
Hemoglobins
Age Groups
Smoking
Antibodies
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Development and validation of a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer in a general Japanese population. / Iida, Masahiro; Ikeda, Fumie; Hata, Jun; Hirakawa, Yoichiro; Ohara, Tomoyuki; Mukai, Naoko; Yoshida, Daigo; Yonemoto, Koji; Esaki, Motohiro; Kitazono, Takanari; Kiyohara, Yutaka; Ninomiya, Toshiharu.

In: Gastric Cancer, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 383-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f34a90630ee3422b83d09df49ebf43b5,
title = "Development and validation of a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer in a general Japanese population",
abstract = "Background: There have been very few reports of risk score models for the development of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk assessment tool for discerning future gastric cancer risk in Japanese. Methods: A total of 2444 subjects aged 40 years or over were followed up for 14 years from 1988 (derivation cohort), and 3204 subjects of the same age group were followed up for 5 years from 2002 (validation cohort). The weighting (risk score) of each risk factor for predicting future gastric cancer in the risk assessment tool was determined based on the coefficients of a Cox proportional hazards model in the derivation cohort. The goodness of fit of the established risk assessment tool was assessed using the c-statistic and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the validation cohort. Results: During the follow-up, gastric cancer developed in 90 subjects in the derivation cohort and 35 subjects in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, the risk prediction model for gastric cancer was established using significant risk factors: age, sex, the combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen status, hemoglobin A1c level, and smoking status. The incidence of gastric cancer increased significantly as the sum of risk scores increased (P trend < 0.001). The risk assessment tool was validated internally and showed good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.76) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P = 0.43) in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We developed a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer that provides a useful guide for stratifying an individual’s risk of future gastric cancer.",
author = "Masahiro Iida and Fumie Ikeda and Jun Hata and Yoichiro Hirakawa and Tomoyuki Ohara and Naoko Mukai and Daigo Yoshida and Koji Yonemoto and Motohiro Esaki and Takanari Kitazono and Yutaka Kiyohara and Toshiharu Ninomiya",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10120-017-0768-8",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "383--390",
journal = "Gastric Cancer",
issn = "1436-3291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer in a general Japanese population

AU - Iida, Masahiro

AU - Ikeda, Fumie

AU - Hata, Jun

AU - Hirakawa, Yoichiro

AU - Ohara, Tomoyuki

AU - Mukai, Naoko

AU - Yoshida, Daigo

AU - Yonemoto, Koji

AU - Esaki, Motohiro

AU - Kitazono, Takanari

AU - Kiyohara, Yutaka

AU - Ninomiya, Toshiharu

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: There have been very few reports of risk score models for the development of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk assessment tool for discerning future gastric cancer risk in Japanese. Methods: A total of 2444 subjects aged 40 years or over were followed up for 14 years from 1988 (derivation cohort), and 3204 subjects of the same age group were followed up for 5 years from 2002 (validation cohort). The weighting (risk score) of each risk factor for predicting future gastric cancer in the risk assessment tool was determined based on the coefficients of a Cox proportional hazards model in the derivation cohort. The goodness of fit of the established risk assessment tool was assessed using the c-statistic and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the validation cohort. Results: During the follow-up, gastric cancer developed in 90 subjects in the derivation cohort and 35 subjects in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, the risk prediction model for gastric cancer was established using significant risk factors: age, sex, the combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen status, hemoglobin A1c level, and smoking status. The incidence of gastric cancer increased significantly as the sum of risk scores increased (P trend < 0.001). The risk assessment tool was validated internally and showed good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.76) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P = 0.43) in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We developed a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer that provides a useful guide for stratifying an individual’s risk of future gastric cancer.

AB - Background: There have been very few reports of risk score models for the development of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk assessment tool for discerning future gastric cancer risk in Japanese. Methods: A total of 2444 subjects aged 40 years or over were followed up for 14 years from 1988 (derivation cohort), and 3204 subjects of the same age group were followed up for 5 years from 2002 (validation cohort). The weighting (risk score) of each risk factor for predicting future gastric cancer in the risk assessment tool was determined based on the coefficients of a Cox proportional hazards model in the derivation cohort. The goodness of fit of the established risk assessment tool was assessed using the c-statistic and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the validation cohort. Results: During the follow-up, gastric cancer developed in 90 subjects in the derivation cohort and 35 subjects in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, the risk prediction model for gastric cancer was established using significant risk factors: age, sex, the combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen status, hemoglobin A1c level, and smoking status. The incidence of gastric cancer increased significantly as the sum of risk scores increased (P trend < 0.001). The risk assessment tool was validated internally and showed good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.76) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P = 0.43) in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We developed a risk assessment tool for gastric cancer that provides a useful guide for stratifying an individual’s risk of future gastric cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031498955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031498955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10120-017-0768-8

DO - 10.1007/s10120-017-0768-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 29043529

AN - SCOPUS:85031498955

VL - 21

SP - 383

EP - 390

JO - Gastric Cancer

JF - Gastric Cancer

SN - 1436-3291

IS - 3

ER -