Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor

Takeshi Kamitani; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Taro Setoguchi; Shuji Sakai; Takashi Okafuji; Shunya Sunami; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Nobuhide Ishii; Makoto Kubo; Eriko Tokunaga; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Hiroshi Honda

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor

Takeshi Kamitani, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Taro Setoguchi, Shuji Sakai, Takashi Okafuji, Shunya Sunami, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Nobuhide Ishii, Makoto Kubo, Eriko Tokunaga, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Hiroshi Honda

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A _z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	341-345
Number of pages	5
Journal	Clinical Imaging
Volume	35
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015
Publication status	Published - Sep 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

Cite this

Kamitani, T., Yabuuchi, H., Matsuo, Y., Setoguchi, T., Sakai, S., Okafuji, T., Sunami, S., Hatakenaka, M., Ishii, N., Kubo, M., Tokunaga, E., Yamamoto, H., & Honda, H. (2011). Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. Clinical Imaging, 35(5), 341-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms : Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. / Kamitani, Takeshi ; Yabuuchi, Hidetake; Matsuo, Yoshio; Setoguchi, Taro; Sakai, Shuji; Okafuji, Takashi; Sunami, Shunya; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu; Ishii, Nobuhide; Kubo, Makoto; Tokunaga, Eriko; Yamamoto, Hidetaka; Honda, Hiroshi.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 5, 09.2011, p. 341-345.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Kamitani, T , Yabuuchi, H, Matsuo, Y, Setoguchi, T, Sakai, S, Okafuji, T, Sunami, S, Hatakenaka, M, Ishii, N, Kubo, M, Tokunaga, E, Yamamoto, H & Honda, H 2011, 'Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor', Clinical Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 341-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

Kamitani, Takeshi ; Yabuuchi, Hidetake ; Matsuo, Yoshio ; Setoguchi, Taro ; Sakai, Shuji ; Okafuji, Takashi ; Sunami, Shunya ; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu ; Ishii, Nobuhide ; Kubo, Makoto ; Tokunaga, Eriko ; Yamamoto, Hidetaka ; Honda, Hiroshi. / Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms : Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. In: Clinical Imaging. 2011 ; Vol. 35, No. 5. pp. 341-345.

@article{c3688d49e39443739464d06272a41414,

title = "Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor",

abstract = "We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.",

author = "Takeshi Kamitani and Hidetake Yabuuchi and Yoshio Matsuo and Taro Setoguchi and Shuji Sakai and Takashi Okafuji and Shunya Sunami and Masamitsu Hatakenaka and Nobuhide Ishii and Makoto Kubo and Eriko Tokunaga and Hidetaka Yamamoto and Hiroshi Honda",

year = "2011",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "341--345",

journal = "Clinical Imaging",

issn = "0899-7071",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms

T2 - Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor

AU - Kamitani, Takeshi

AU - Yabuuchi, Hidetake

AU - Matsuo, Yoshio

AU - Setoguchi, Taro

AU - Sakai, Shuji

AU - Okafuji, Takashi

AU - Sunami, Shunya

AU - Hatakenaka, Masamitsu

AU - Ishii, Nobuhide

AU - Kubo, Makoto

AU - Tokunaga, Eriko

AU - Yamamoto, Hidetaka

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.

AB - We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052000970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052000970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 21872122

AN - SCOPUS:80052000970

VL - 35

SP - 341

EP - 345

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 5

ER -

Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this