Abstract
We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 341-345 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Clinical Imaging |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 1 2011 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms : Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. / Kamitani, Takeshi; Yabuuchi, Hidetake; Matsuo, Yoshio; Setoguchi, Taro; Sakai, Shuji; Okafuji, Takashi; Sunami, Shunya; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu; Ishii, Nobuhide; Kubo, Makoto; Tokunaga, Eriko; Yamamoto, Hidetaka; Honda, Hiroshi.
In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.09.2011, p. 341-345.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms
T2 - Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor
AU - Kamitani, Takeshi
AU - Yabuuchi, Hidetake
AU - Matsuo, Yoshio
AU - Setoguchi, Taro
AU - Sakai, Shuji
AU - Okafuji, Takashi
AU - Sunami, Shunya
AU - Hatakenaka, Masamitsu
AU - Ishii, Nobuhide
AU - Kubo, Makoto
AU - Tokunaga, Eriko
AU - Yamamoto, Hidetaka
AU - Honda, Hiroshi
PY - 2011/9/1
Y1 - 2011/9/1
N2 - We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.
AB - We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A z of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052000970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052000970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015
DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 21872122
AN - SCOPUS:80052000970
VL - 35
SP - 341
EP - 345
JO - Clinical Imaging
JF - Clinical Imaging
SN - 0899-7071
IS - 5
ER -