Difference in the retinal cone mosaic pattern between zebrafish and medaka: Cell-rearrangement model

Shusaku Tohya, Atsushi Mochizuki, Y. Iwasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In fish retina, four kinds of photoreceptor cells (or cones) are two-dimensionally arranged in a very regular manner, forming cone mosaics. Mosaic pattern differs between species - two typical patterns are "row mosaic" and "square mosaic", exemplified by the cone mosaics in zebrafish and in medaka, respectively. In this paper, we study a cell-rearrangement model. Cells with pre-fixed fate exchange their locations between nearest neighbors and form regular mosaic patterns spontaneously, if the adhesive force between nearest neighbors and between next-nearest neighbors depend on their cell types in an appropriate manner. The same model can produce both row and square mosaic patterns. However, if the cell-cell interaction is restricted to nearest neighbors only, the square mosaic (medaka pattern) cannot be generated, showing the importance of interaction between next-nearest neighbors. In determining whether row mosaic (zebrafish pattern) or square mosaic (medaka pattern) is to be formed, two shape factors are very important, which control the way adhesions in different geometric relations are combined. We also developed theoretical analysis of the parameter ranges for the row mosaic and the square mosaic to have higher total adhesion than alternative spatial patterns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-300
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Theoretical Biology
Volume221
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 21 2003

Fingerprint

Oryzias
Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells
cones (retina)
Zebrafish
Rearrangement
Danio rerio
Cones
Cone
Cell
Adhesion
cells
Nearest Neighbor
Fish
adhesion
Adhesives
Cell Communication
Model
Retina
Fishes
photoreceptors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Difference in the retinal cone mosaic pattern between zebrafish and medaka : Cell-rearrangement model. / Tohya, Shusaku; Mochizuki, Atsushi; Iwasa, Y.

In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 221, No. 2, 21.03.2003, p. 289-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tohya, Shusaku ; Mochizuki, Atsushi ; Iwasa, Y. / Difference in the retinal cone mosaic pattern between zebrafish and medaka : Cell-rearrangement model. In: Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2003 ; Vol. 221, No. 2. pp. 289-300.
@article{b1eeeabb410d4c7ea0eb379dc5f5d3d7,
title = "Difference in the retinal cone mosaic pattern between zebrafish and medaka: Cell-rearrangement model",
abstract = "In fish retina, four kinds of photoreceptor cells (or cones) are two-dimensionally arranged in a very regular manner, forming cone mosaics. Mosaic pattern differs between species - two typical patterns are {"}row mosaic{"} and {"}square mosaic{"}, exemplified by the cone mosaics in zebrafish and in medaka, respectively. In this paper, we study a cell-rearrangement model. Cells with pre-fixed fate exchange their locations between nearest neighbors and form regular mosaic patterns spontaneously, if the adhesive force between nearest neighbors and between next-nearest neighbors depend on their cell types in an appropriate manner. The same model can produce both row and square mosaic patterns. However, if the cell-cell interaction is restricted to nearest neighbors only, the square mosaic (medaka pattern) cannot be generated, showing the importance of interaction between next-nearest neighbors. In determining whether row mosaic (zebrafish pattern) or square mosaic (medaka pattern) is to be formed, two shape factors are very important, which control the way adhesions in different geometric relations are combined. We also developed theoretical analysis of the parameter ranges for the row mosaic and the square mosaic to have higher total adhesion than alternative spatial patterns.",
author = "Shusaku Tohya and Atsushi Mochizuki and Y. Iwasa",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1006/jtbi.2003.3192",
language = "English",
volume = "221",
pages = "289--300",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Biology",
issn = "0022-5193",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Difference in the retinal cone mosaic pattern between zebrafish and medaka

T2 - Cell-rearrangement model

AU - Tohya, Shusaku

AU - Mochizuki, Atsushi

AU - Iwasa, Y.

PY - 2003/3/21

Y1 - 2003/3/21

N2 - In fish retina, four kinds of photoreceptor cells (or cones) are two-dimensionally arranged in a very regular manner, forming cone mosaics. Mosaic pattern differs between species - two typical patterns are "row mosaic" and "square mosaic", exemplified by the cone mosaics in zebrafish and in medaka, respectively. In this paper, we study a cell-rearrangement model. Cells with pre-fixed fate exchange their locations between nearest neighbors and form regular mosaic patterns spontaneously, if the adhesive force between nearest neighbors and between next-nearest neighbors depend on their cell types in an appropriate manner. The same model can produce both row and square mosaic patterns. However, if the cell-cell interaction is restricted to nearest neighbors only, the square mosaic (medaka pattern) cannot be generated, showing the importance of interaction between next-nearest neighbors. In determining whether row mosaic (zebrafish pattern) or square mosaic (medaka pattern) is to be formed, two shape factors are very important, which control the way adhesions in different geometric relations are combined. We also developed theoretical analysis of the parameter ranges for the row mosaic and the square mosaic to have higher total adhesion than alternative spatial patterns.

AB - In fish retina, four kinds of photoreceptor cells (or cones) are two-dimensionally arranged in a very regular manner, forming cone mosaics. Mosaic pattern differs between species - two typical patterns are "row mosaic" and "square mosaic", exemplified by the cone mosaics in zebrafish and in medaka, respectively. In this paper, we study a cell-rearrangement model. Cells with pre-fixed fate exchange their locations between nearest neighbors and form regular mosaic patterns spontaneously, if the adhesive force between nearest neighbors and between next-nearest neighbors depend on their cell types in an appropriate manner. The same model can produce both row and square mosaic patterns. However, if the cell-cell interaction is restricted to nearest neighbors only, the square mosaic (medaka pattern) cannot be generated, showing the importance of interaction between next-nearest neighbors. In determining whether row mosaic (zebrafish pattern) or square mosaic (medaka pattern) is to be formed, two shape factors are very important, which control the way adhesions in different geometric relations are combined. We also developed theoretical analysis of the parameter ranges for the row mosaic and the square mosaic to have higher total adhesion than alternative spatial patterns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037459240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037459240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3192

DO - 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3192

M3 - Article

C2 - 12628235

AN - SCOPUS:0037459240

VL - 221

SP - 289

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology

JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology

SN - 0022-5193

IS - 2

ER -