Differences in sap flux-based stand transpiration between upper and lower slope positions in a Japanese cypress plantation watershed

Tomonori Kume, Kenji Tsuruta, Hikaru Komatsu, Yoshinori Shinohara, Ayumi Katayama, Jun'ichiro Ide, Kyoichi Otsuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the difference in stand transpiration (E) between upper (UP) and lower (LP) slope plots of a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) watershed to obtain catchment-scale E estimates. Sap flux-based stand-scale E estimates were conducted on the UP and LP, which had contrasting stand structures (diameter at breast height and tree height) despite being the same age. The plant area index was similar in the UP and LP, while the total sapwood area (AS_stand) and the mean sap flux density (JS) in the UP were 23% and ~30% lower, respectively, than those of the LP. Stand-scale E is the product of the AS_stand and JS in a stand. As a result, E in the UP was ~50% lower than that in the LP. This ratio was relatively constant throughout the year, which was supported by a similar decline in E, which resulted from soil water decline in the UP and LP. Canopy conductance (GC) in the UP was ~50% smaller than that of the LP. In contrast to previous studies that showed a consistent JS along a slope, the differences in E between the UP and LP were caused by differences in AS_stand and JS, probably because the UP exhibited a lower GC per unit leaf area than the LP. Additionally, evapotranspiration (ET), the sum of sap flux-scaled E plus rainfall interception, was 8–14% lower than the catchment water balance ET (precipitation minus runoff), which suggests the feasibility of calculating sap flux-scaled E for the two slope positions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1105-1116
Number of pages12
JournalEcohydrology
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

sap
transpiration
plantation
plantations
watershed
evapotranspiration
catchment
stand structure
interception
Chamaecyparis obtusa
leaf area
water budget
sapwood
soil water
canopy
tree and stand measurements
water balance
runoff
rainfall
rain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Differences in sap flux-based stand transpiration between upper and lower slope positions in a Japanese cypress plantation watershed. / Kume, Tomonori; Tsuruta, Kenji; Komatsu, Hikaru; Shinohara, Yoshinori; Katayama, Ayumi; Ide, Jun'ichiro; Otsuki, Kyoichi.

In: Ecohydrology, Vol. 9, No. 6, 01.09.2016, p. 1105-1116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b5839a83eb434edba8effbd0b5aa86f0,
title = "Differences in sap flux-based stand transpiration between upper and lower slope positions in a Japanese cypress plantation watershed",
abstract = "This study investigated the difference in stand transpiration (E) between upper (UP) and lower (LP) slope plots of a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) watershed to obtain catchment-scale E estimates. Sap flux-based stand-scale E estimates were conducted on the UP and LP, which had contrasting stand structures (diameter at breast height and tree height) despite being the same age. The plant area index was similar in the UP and LP, while the total sapwood area (AS_stand) and the mean sap flux density (JS) in the UP were 23{\%} and ~30{\%} lower, respectively, than those of the LP. Stand-scale E is the product of the AS_stand and JS in a stand. As a result, E in the UP was ~50{\%} lower than that in the LP. This ratio was relatively constant throughout the year, which was supported by a similar decline in E, which resulted from soil water decline in the UP and LP. Canopy conductance (GC) in the UP was ~50{\%} smaller than that of the LP. In contrast to previous studies that showed a consistent JS along a slope, the differences in E between the UP and LP were caused by differences in AS_stand and JS, probably because the UP exhibited a lower GC per unit leaf area than the LP. Additionally, evapotranspiration (ET), the sum of sap flux-scaled E plus rainfall interception, was 8–14{\%} lower than the catchment water balance ET (precipitation minus runoff), which suggests the feasibility of calculating sap flux-scaled E for the two slope positions.",
author = "Tomonori Kume and Kenji Tsuruta and Hikaru Komatsu and Yoshinori Shinohara and Ayumi Katayama and Jun'ichiro Ide and Kyoichi Otsuki",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eco.1709",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1105--1116",
journal = "Ecohydrology",
issn = "1936-0584",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in sap flux-based stand transpiration between upper and lower slope positions in a Japanese cypress plantation watershed

AU - Kume, Tomonori

AU - Tsuruta, Kenji

AU - Komatsu, Hikaru

AU - Shinohara, Yoshinori

AU - Katayama, Ayumi

AU - Ide, Jun'ichiro

AU - Otsuki, Kyoichi

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - This study investigated the difference in stand transpiration (E) between upper (UP) and lower (LP) slope plots of a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) watershed to obtain catchment-scale E estimates. Sap flux-based stand-scale E estimates were conducted on the UP and LP, which had contrasting stand structures (diameter at breast height and tree height) despite being the same age. The plant area index was similar in the UP and LP, while the total sapwood area (AS_stand) and the mean sap flux density (JS) in the UP were 23% and ~30% lower, respectively, than those of the LP. Stand-scale E is the product of the AS_stand and JS in a stand. As a result, E in the UP was ~50% lower than that in the LP. This ratio was relatively constant throughout the year, which was supported by a similar decline in E, which resulted from soil water decline in the UP and LP. Canopy conductance (GC) in the UP was ~50% smaller than that of the LP. In contrast to previous studies that showed a consistent JS along a slope, the differences in E between the UP and LP were caused by differences in AS_stand and JS, probably because the UP exhibited a lower GC per unit leaf area than the LP. Additionally, evapotranspiration (ET), the sum of sap flux-scaled E plus rainfall interception, was 8–14% lower than the catchment water balance ET (precipitation minus runoff), which suggests the feasibility of calculating sap flux-scaled E for the two slope positions.

AB - This study investigated the difference in stand transpiration (E) between upper (UP) and lower (LP) slope plots of a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) watershed to obtain catchment-scale E estimates. Sap flux-based stand-scale E estimates were conducted on the UP and LP, which had contrasting stand structures (diameter at breast height and tree height) despite being the same age. The plant area index was similar in the UP and LP, while the total sapwood area (AS_stand) and the mean sap flux density (JS) in the UP were 23% and ~30% lower, respectively, than those of the LP. Stand-scale E is the product of the AS_stand and JS in a stand. As a result, E in the UP was ~50% lower than that in the LP. This ratio was relatively constant throughout the year, which was supported by a similar decline in E, which resulted from soil water decline in the UP and LP. Canopy conductance (GC) in the UP was ~50% smaller than that of the LP. In contrast to previous studies that showed a consistent JS along a slope, the differences in E between the UP and LP were caused by differences in AS_stand and JS, probably because the UP exhibited a lower GC per unit leaf area than the LP. Additionally, evapotranspiration (ET), the sum of sap flux-scaled E plus rainfall interception, was 8–14% lower than the catchment water balance ET (precipitation minus runoff), which suggests the feasibility of calculating sap flux-scaled E for the two slope positions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952705975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952705975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eco.1709

DO - 10.1002/eco.1709

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84952705975

VL - 9

SP - 1105

EP - 1116

JO - Ecohydrology

JF - Ecohydrology

SN - 1936-0584

IS - 6

ER -