Differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas vs. groove pancreatitis: Usefulness of the portal venous phase

Kousei Ishigami, Tsuyoshi Tajima, Akihiro Nishie, Daisuke Kakihara, Nobuhiro Fujita, Yoshiki Asayama, yasuhiro ushijima, Hiroyuki Irie, Masafumi Nakamura, Shunichi Takahata, Tetsuhide Ito, Hiroshi Honda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To clarify if the portal venous phase is helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. Materials and methods: MDCT and MRI of groove pancreatic carcinomas (n = 7) and groove pancreatitis (n = 15) were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists independently. The signal intensity on T2-weighted images was subjectively assessed. The presence or absence of common bile duct (CBD) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions was evaluated. Additionally, the appearance of groove pancreatic carcinoma and that of groove pancreatitis in the portal venous phase on dynamic MDCT and MRI were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the signal intensity on T2-weighted images and in the presence or absence of CBD and MPD strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions between groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. However, patchy focal enhancement in the portal venous phase was more commonly observed in groove pancreatitis than groove pancreatic carcinoma (Reviewers 1 and 2: 14/15 [93.3%] vs. 1/7 [14.3%], P < 0.0001). In addition, peripheral enhancement was only seen in groove pancreatic carcinomas (Reviewer 1: 4/7 [57.1%] vs. 0/15 [0%], P < 0.005, and Reviewer 2: 3/7 [42.9%] vs. 0/15 [0%], P < 0.05). Conclusion: The portal venous phase may be helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

Pancreatitis
Differential Diagnosis
Pancreatic Ducts
Common Bile Duct
Pathologic Constriction
Pancreatic Carcinoma

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas vs. groove pancreatitis : Usefulness of the portal venous phase. / Ishigami, Kousei; Tajima, Tsuyoshi; Nishie, Akihiro; Kakihara, Daisuke; Fujita, Nobuhiro; Asayama, Yoshiki; ushijima, yasuhiro; Irie, Hiroyuki; Nakamura, Masafumi; Takahata, Shunichi; Ito, Tetsuhide; Honda, Hiroshi.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 74, No. 3, 01.06.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ishigami, Kousei ; Tajima, Tsuyoshi ; Nishie, Akihiro ; Kakihara, Daisuke ; Fujita, Nobuhiro ; Asayama, Yoshiki ; ushijima, yasuhiro ; Irie, Hiroyuki ; Nakamura, Masafumi ; Takahata, Shunichi ; Ito, Tetsuhide ; Honda, Hiroshi. / Differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas vs. groove pancreatitis : Usefulness of the portal venous phase. In: European Journal of Radiology. 2010 ; Vol. 74, No. 3.
@article{d8eba38087934e9fb951779316d279b0,
title = "Differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas vs. groove pancreatitis: Usefulness of the portal venous phase",
abstract = "Purpose: To clarify if the portal venous phase is helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. Materials and methods: MDCT and MRI of groove pancreatic carcinomas (n = 7) and groove pancreatitis (n = 15) were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists independently. The signal intensity on T2-weighted images was subjectively assessed. The presence or absence of common bile duct (CBD) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions was evaluated. Additionally, the appearance of groove pancreatic carcinoma and that of groove pancreatitis in the portal venous phase on dynamic MDCT and MRI were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the signal intensity on T2-weighted images and in the presence or absence of CBD and MPD strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions between groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. However, patchy focal enhancement in the portal venous phase was more commonly observed in groove pancreatitis than groove pancreatic carcinoma (Reviewers 1 and 2: 14/15 [93.3{\%}] vs. 1/7 [14.3{\%}], P < 0.0001). In addition, peripheral enhancement was only seen in groove pancreatic carcinomas (Reviewer 1: 4/7 [57.1{\%}] vs. 0/15 [0{\%}], P < 0.005, and Reviewer 2: 3/7 [42.9{\%}] vs. 0/15 [0{\%}], P < 0.05). Conclusion: The portal venous phase may be helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis.",
author = "Kousei Ishigami and Tsuyoshi Tajima and Akihiro Nishie and Daisuke Kakihara and Nobuhiro Fujita and Yoshiki Asayama and yasuhiro ushijima and Hiroyuki Irie and Masafumi Nakamura and Shunichi Takahata and Tetsuhide Ito and Hiroshi Honda",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.026",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
journal = "European Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas vs. groove pancreatitis

T2 - Usefulness of the portal venous phase

AU - Ishigami, Kousei

AU - Tajima, Tsuyoshi

AU - Nishie, Akihiro

AU - Kakihara, Daisuke

AU - Fujita, Nobuhiro

AU - Asayama, Yoshiki

AU - ushijima, yasuhiro

AU - Irie, Hiroyuki

AU - Nakamura, Masafumi

AU - Takahata, Shunichi

AU - Ito, Tetsuhide

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To clarify if the portal venous phase is helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. Materials and methods: MDCT and MRI of groove pancreatic carcinomas (n = 7) and groove pancreatitis (n = 15) were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists independently. The signal intensity on T2-weighted images was subjectively assessed. The presence or absence of common bile duct (CBD) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions was evaluated. Additionally, the appearance of groove pancreatic carcinoma and that of groove pancreatitis in the portal venous phase on dynamic MDCT and MRI were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the signal intensity on T2-weighted images and in the presence or absence of CBD and MPD strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions between groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. However, patchy focal enhancement in the portal venous phase was more commonly observed in groove pancreatitis than groove pancreatic carcinoma (Reviewers 1 and 2: 14/15 [93.3%] vs. 1/7 [14.3%], P < 0.0001). In addition, peripheral enhancement was only seen in groove pancreatic carcinomas (Reviewer 1: 4/7 [57.1%] vs. 0/15 [0%], P < 0.005, and Reviewer 2: 3/7 [42.9%] vs. 0/15 [0%], P < 0.05). Conclusion: The portal venous phase may be helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis.

AB - Purpose: To clarify if the portal venous phase is helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. Materials and methods: MDCT and MRI of groove pancreatic carcinomas (n = 7) and groove pancreatitis (n = 15) were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists independently. The signal intensity on T2-weighted images was subjectively assessed. The presence or absence of common bile duct (CBD) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions was evaluated. Additionally, the appearance of groove pancreatic carcinoma and that of groove pancreatitis in the portal venous phase on dynamic MDCT and MRI were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the signal intensity on T2-weighted images and in the presence or absence of CBD and MPD strictures, calcifications, and cystic lesions between groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis. However, patchy focal enhancement in the portal venous phase was more commonly observed in groove pancreatitis than groove pancreatic carcinoma (Reviewers 1 and 2: 14/15 [93.3%] vs. 1/7 [14.3%], P < 0.0001). In addition, peripheral enhancement was only seen in groove pancreatic carcinomas (Reviewer 1: 4/7 [57.1%] vs. 0/15 [0%], P < 0.005, and Reviewer 2: 3/7 [42.9%] vs. 0/15 [0%], P < 0.05). Conclusion: The portal venous phase may be helpful for the differential diagnosis of groove pancreatic carcinomas and groove pancreatitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952881849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952881849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.026

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 19450943

AN - SCOPUS:77952881849

VL - 74

JO - European Journal of Radiology

JF - European Journal of Radiology

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 3

ER -