Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials

T. Morioka, Shozo Tobimatsu, K. Fujii, H. Nakagaki, M. Fukui, M. Kato, K. Shibata, S. Takahashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We recorded spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (spinal SEPs) in 30 operations following stimulation of the epidural spinal cord and the peripheral nerve, respectively, to compare their feasibility as an intraoperative technique for spinal cord monitoring. SCEPs produced quicker responses and had larger amplitudes with simpler waveforms. SCEPs could reflect residual function of the pathological spinal cord and predict the postoperative clinical outcome, findings which are not observed with spinal SEPs. Moreover, SCEPs had a much higher sensitivity to spinal cord insult. Therefore, we conclude that the SCEPs were more appropriate indicator than the spinal SEPs as an intra-operative monitoring method for spinal cord function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-127
Number of pages6
JournalActa Neurochirurgica
Volume108
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peripheral Nerves
Spinal Cord
Evoked Potentials
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Spinal Cord Stimulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials. / Morioka, T.; Tobimatsu, Shozo; Fujii, K.; Nakagaki, H.; Fukui, M.; Kato, M.; Shibata, K.; Takahashi, S.

In: Acta Neurochirurgica, Vol. 108, No. 3-4, 01.09.1991, p. 122-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morioka, T. ; Tobimatsu, Shozo ; Fujii, K. ; Nakagaki, H. ; Fukui, M. ; Kato, M. ; Shibata, K. ; Takahashi, S. / Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials. In: Acta Neurochirurgica. 1991 ; Vol. 108, No. 3-4. pp. 122-127.
@article{b03d9e2a51464b71ac4e80a17da7b6d0,
title = "Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials",
abstract = "We recorded spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (spinal SEPs) in 30 operations following stimulation of the epidural spinal cord and the peripheral nerve, respectively, to compare their feasibility as an intraoperative technique for spinal cord monitoring. SCEPs produced quicker responses and had larger amplitudes with simpler waveforms. SCEPs could reflect residual function of the pathological spinal cord and predict the postoperative clinical outcome, findings which are not observed with spinal SEPs. Moreover, SCEPs had a much higher sensitivity to spinal cord insult. Therefore, we conclude that the SCEPs were more appropriate indicator than the spinal SEPs as an intra-operative monitoring method for spinal cord function.",
author = "T. Morioka and Shozo Tobimatsu and K. Fujii and H. Nakagaki and M. Fukui and M. Kato and K. Shibata and S. Takahashi",
year = "1991",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01418519",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "122--127",
journal = "Acta Neurochirurgica",
issn = "0001-6268",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials

AU - Morioka, T.

AU - Tobimatsu, Shozo

AU - Fujii, K.

AU - Nakagaki, H.

AU - Fukui, M.

AU - Kato, M.

AU - Shibata, K.

AU - Takahashi, S.

PY - 1991/9/1

Y1 - 1991/9/1

N2 - We recorded spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (spinal SEPs) in 30 operations following stimulation of the epidural spinal cord and the peripheral nerve, respectively, to compare their feasibility as an intraoperative technique for spinal cord monitoring. SCEPs produced quicker responses and had larger amplitudes with simpler waveforms. SCEPs could reflect residual function of the pathological spinal cord and predict the postoperative clinical outcome, findings which are not observed with spinal SEPs. Moreover, SCEPs had a much higher sensitivity to spinal cord insult. Therefore, we conclude that the SCEPs were more appropriate indicator than the spinal SEPs as an intra-operative monitoring method for spinal cord function.

AB - We recorded spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (spinal SEPs) in 30 operations following stimulation of the epidural spinal cord and the peripheral nerve, respectively, to compare their feasibility as an intraoperative technique for spinal cord monitoring. SCEPs produced quicker responses and had larger amplitudes with simpler waveforms. SCEPs could reflect residual function of the pathological spinal cord and predict the postoperative clinical outcome, findings which are not observed with spinal SEPs. Moreover, SCEPs had a much higher sensitivity to spinal cord insult. Therefore, we conclude that the SCEPs were more appropriate indicator than the spinal SEPs as an intra-operative monitoring method for spinal cord function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026033851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026033851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01418519

DO - 10.1007/BF01418519

M3 - Article

C2 - 2031472

AN - SCOPUS:0026033851

VL - 108

SP - 122

EP - 127

JO - Acta Neurochirurgica

JF - Acta Neurochirurgica

SN - 0001-6268

IS - 3-4

ER -