Distinction in morphology and esterase isozyme between Eupatorium glehni (=E. chinense subsp. sachalinense) and E. chinense var. oppositifolium (compositae)

Takayuki Kawahara, Tetsukazu Yahara, Kuniaki Watanabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The taxonomic status of Eupatorium chinese var. oppositofolium and E. glehni (=E. chinense subsp. sachalinense) in E. chinense complex semsu Kitamura has long been controversial. In this paper, the degree of divergence between diploids of these two taxa was examined by means of morphological studies including principal component analysis, the electrophoretic analysis of esterase isozyme variation and observations on habitats. The data obtained through the examinations indicate these two taxa are diverged enough to be recognized as distinct biological species. Since the polyploid E. chinense var. oppositifolium is more or less intermediate in morphology between the two diploid taxa, it is considered to have masked the distinction between the two diploid taxa. Also, electrophoretic evidence suggests that polyploid E. chinense var. oppositifolium is not a hybrid or hybrid derivative with E. glehni as a parental species. Possible origin of polyploid E. chinense var oppositifolium is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-179
Number of pages15
JournalThe Botanical Magazine Tokyo
Volume102
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Plant Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distinction in morphology and esterase isozyme between Eupatorium glehni (=E. chinense subsp. sachalinense) and E. chinense var. oppositifolium (compositae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this