Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies

T. J. Barloon, C. C. Lu, H. Honda, K. S. Berbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to determine if a normal small-bowel enteroclysis excludes small-bowel disease in adult patients, using long-term follow-up as the major reference standard. We reviewed 193 consecutive small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) studies completed during a period from January 1987 to February 1989, of which 83 were judged to be normal at the time of the study. Eight of these latter patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. The indications included detection of gastrointestinal bleeding, small-bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, nonspecific abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and a miscellaneous group. Each patient was followed for at least 3 years by chart review or until a definite diagnosis was established. Six of the 75 patients whose SBE was originally interpreted as normal were eventually judged to have small-bowel disease. The remaining 69 patients were judged to be free of small-bowel disease by autopsy, surgical laparotomy, endoscopie observation or biopsy, or long-term follow-up for at least 3 years. Therefore, a normal SBE correctly excluded small-bowel disease in 69 of our 75 patients (true negatives) and failed to diagnose disease in six patients (false negatives), for a specificity of.92±.03 (SE). In this experience, SBE was sufficiently specific in most patients to exclude small-bowel disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-115
Number of pages3
JournalAbdominal imaging
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 1994

Fingerprint

Time and Motion Studies
Crohn Disease
Laparotomy
Abdominal Pain
Autopsy
Diarrhea
Observation
Hemorrhage
Biopsy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology

Cite this

Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies. / Barloon, T. J.; Lu, C. C.; Honda, H.; Berbaum, K. S.

In: Abdominal imaging, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.03.1994, p. 113-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barloon, T. J. ; Lu, C. C. ; Honda, H. ; Berbaum, K. S. / Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies. In: Abdominal imaging. 1994 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 113-115.
@article{6f826c8116af4c329b049c44b30698c4,
title = "Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies",
abstract = "The purpose of our study was to determine if a normal small-bowel enteroclysis excludes small-bowel disease in adult patients, using long-term follow-up as the major reference standard. We reviewed 193 consecutive small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) studies completed during a period from January 1987 to February 1989, of which 83 were judged to be normal at the time of the study. Eight of these latter patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. The indications included detection of gastrointestinal bleeding, small-bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, nonspecific abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and a miscellaneous group. Each patient was followed for at least 3 years by chart review or until a definite diagnosis was established. Six of the 75 patients whose SBE was originally interpreted as normal were eventually judged to have small-bowel disease. The remaining 69 patients were judged to be free of small-bowel disease by autopsy, surgical laparotomy, endoscopie observation or biopsy, or long-term follow-up for at least 3 years. Therefore, a normal SBE correctly excluded small-bowel disease in 69 of our 75 patients (true negatives) and failed to diagnose disease in six patients (false negatives), for a specificity of.92±.03 (SE). In this experience, SBE was sufficiently specific in most patients to exclude small-bowel disease.",
author = "Barloon, {T. J.} and Lu, {C. C.} and H. Honda and Berbaum, {K. S.}",
year = "1994",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF00203483",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "113--115",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies

AU - Barloon, T. J.

AU - Lu, C. C.

AU - Honda, H.

AU - Berbaum, K. S.

PY - 1994/3/1

Y1 - 1994/3/1

N2 - The purpose of our study was to determine if a normal small-bowel enteroclysis excludes small-bowel disease in adult patients, using long-term follow-up as the major reference standard. We reviewed 193 consecutive small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) studies completed during a period from January 1987 to February 1989, of which 83 were judged to be normal at the time of the study. Eight of these latter patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. The indications included detection of gastrointestinal bleeding, small-bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, nonspecific abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and a miscellaneous group. Each patient was followed for at least 3 years by chart review or until a definite diagnosis was established. Six of the 75 patients whose SBE was originally interpreted as normal were eventually judged to have small-bowel disease. The remaining 69 patients were judged to be free of small-bowel disease by autopsy, surgical laparotomy, endoscopie observation or biopsy, or long-term follow-up for at least 3 years. Therefore, a normal SBE correctly excluded small-bowel disease in 69 of our 75 patients (true negatives) and failed to diagnose disease in six patients (false negatives), for a specificity of.92±.03 (SE). In this experience, SBE was sufficiently specific in most patients to exclude small-bowel disease.

AB - The purpose of our study was to determine if a normal small-bowel enteroclysis excludes small-bowel disease in adult patients, using long-term follow-up as the major reference standard. We reviewed 193 consecutive small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) studies completed during a period from January 1987 to February 1989, of which 83 were judged to be normal at the time of the study. Eight of these latter patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. The indications included detection of gastrointestinal bleeding, small-bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, nonspecific abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and a miscellaneous group. Each patient was followed for at least 3 years by chart review or until a definite diagnosis was established. Six of the 75 patients whose SBE was originally interpreted as normal were eventually judged to have small-bowel disease. The remaining 69 patients were judged to be free of small-bowel disease by autopsy, surgical laparotomy, endoscopie observation or biopsy, or long-term follow-up for at least 3 years. Therefore, a normal SBE correctly excluded small-bowel disease in 69 of our 75 patients (true negatives) and failed to diagnose disease in six patients (false negatives), for a specificity of.92±.03 (SE). In this experience, SBE was sufficiently specific in most patients to exclude small-bowel disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028261501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028261501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00203483

DO - 10.1007/BF00203483

M3 - Article

C2 - 8199540

AN - SCOPUS:0028261501

VL - 19

SP - 113

EP - 115

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

IS - 2

ER -