Does Modic Change Progresss with Age?

Kiyoshi Tarukado, Teruaki Ono, Osamu Tono, Hiroki Tanaka, Ko Ikuta, Katsumi Harimaya, Toshio Doi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Cross-sectional imaging study. Objective. The aim of this study was to clarify the trend in the generation distinctions about the prevalence of Modic change (MC) including elderly patients. Summary of Background Data. MC has been discussed regarding its clinical significance, relationship with low back pain, suitable treatments, prevalence, and natural history. However, previous reports have focused on younger subjects, with few studies conducted in elderly patients. If MC is actually a progressive condition of a patient, then it should become more common as the patient ages. We herein report the distribution of MC across several age groups. Methods. Patients who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution from April 2013 to March 2015 were recruited. MC was assessed using T1-and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and divided into Modic types (MT) 1, 2, and 3, and mixed type. Trends in the prevalence of MC were analyzed based on age. Results. We ultimately included 585 patients of an initial 937 who underwent lumbar MRI. The mean age was 65 years. MC was identified in 36.0% of the patients. The prevalence of MC by age was 0% for those in their 10 s, 10% for those in their 20 s, 33% for those in their 30 s, 27% for those in their 40 s, 32% for those in their 50 s, 44% for those in their 60 s, 42% for those in their 70 s, and 26% for those in their 80 s. By type, 3.3% were MT1, 81.3% were MT2, 0.5% were MT3, and 14.8% were mixed type. Conclusion. The prevalence of MC increased with age to some degree, with the highest frequency observed in individuals in their 60 s before declining in those in their 70 s and 80 s. These findings suggest that MC might not simply progress with age, particularly after the seventh decade of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1805-1809
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume42
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Low Back Pain
Natural History
Age Groups
Cross-Sectional Studies
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Tarukado, K., Ono, T., Tono, O., Tanaka, H., Ikuta, K., Harimaya, K., & Doi, T. (2017). Does Modic Change Progresss with Age? Spine, 42(23), 1805-1809. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002254

Does Modic Change Progresss with Age? / Tarukado, Kiyoshi; Ono, Teruaki; Tono, Osamu; Tanaka, Hiroki; Ikuta, Ko; Harimaya, Katsumi; Doi, Toshio.

In: Spine, Vol. 42, No. 23, 01.12.2017, p. 1805-1809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tarukado, K, Ono, T, Tono, O, Tanaka, H, Ikuta, K, Harimaya, K & Doi, T 2017, 'Does Modic Change Progresss with Age?', Spine, vol. 42, no. 23, pp. 1805-1809. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002254
Tarukado K, Ono T, Tono O, Tanaka H, Ikuta K, Harimaya K et al. Does Modic Change Progresss with Age? Spine. 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1805-1809. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002254
Tarukado, Kiyoshi ; Ono, Teruaki ; Tono, Osamu ; Tanaka, Hiroki ; Ikuta, Ko ; Harimaya, Katsumi ; Doi, Toshio. / Does Modic Change Progresss with Age?. In: Spine. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 23. pp. 1805-1809.
@article{1d55d5883f604c75a71b43224fbe3182,
title = "Does Modic Change Progresss with Age?",
abstract = "Study Design. Cross-sectional imaging study. Objective. The aim of this study was to clarify the trend in the generation distinctions about the prevalence of Modic change (MC) including elderly patients. Summary of Background Data. MC has been discussed regarding its clinical significance, relationship with low back pain, suitable treatments, prevalence, and natural history. However, previous reports have focused on younger subjects, with few studies conducted in elderly patients. If MC is actually a progressive condition of a patient, then it should become more common as the patient ages. We herein report the distribution of MC across several age groups. Methods. Patients who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution from April 2013 to March 2015 were recruited. MC was assessed using T1-and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and divided into Modic types (MT) 1, 2, and 3, and mixed type. Trends in the prevalence of MC were analyzed based on age. Results. We ultimately included 585 patients of an initial 937 who underwent lumbar MRI. The mean age was 65 years. MC was identified in 36.0{\%} of the patients. The prevalence of MC by age was 0{\%} for those in their 10 s, 10{\%} for those in their 20 s, 33{\%} for those in their 30 s, 27{\%} for those in their 40 s, 32{\%} for those in their 50 s, 44{\%} for those in their 60 s, 42{\%} for those in their 70 s, and 26{\%} for those in their 80 s. By type, 3.3{\%} were MT1, 81.3{\%} were MT2, 0.5{\%} were MT3, and 14.8{\%} were mixed type. Conclusion. The prevalence of MC increased with age to some degree, with the highest frequency observed in individuals in their 60 s before declining in those in their 70 s and 80 s. These findings suggest that MC might not simply progress with age, particularly after the seventh decade of life.",
author = "Kiyoshi Tarukado and Teruaki Ono and Osamu Tono and Hiroki Tanaka and Ko Ikuta and Katsumi Harimaya and Toshio Doi",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000002254",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1805--1809",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Modic Change Progresss with Age?

AU - Tarukado, Kiyoshi

AU - Ono, Teruaki

AU - Tono, Osamu

AU - Tanaka, Hiroki

AU - Ikuta, Ko

AU - Harimaya, Katsumi

AU - Doi, Toshio

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Study Design. Cross-sectional imaging study. Objective. The aim of this study was to clarify the trend in the generation distinctions about the prevalence of Modic change (MC) including elderly patients. Summary of Background Data. MC has been discussed regarding its clinical significance, relationship with low back pain, suitable treatments, prevalence, and natural history. However, previous reports have focused on younger subjects, with few studies conducted in elderly patients. If MC is actually a progressive condition of a patient, then it should become more common as the patient ages. We herein report the distribution of MC across several age groups. Methods. Patients who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution from April 2013 to March 2015 were recruited. MC was assessed using T1-and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and divided into Modic types (MT) 1, 2, and 3, and mixed type. Trends in the prevalence of MC were analyzed based on age. Results. We ultimately included 585 patients of an initial 937 who underwent lumbar MRI. The mean age was 65 years. MC was identified in 36.0% of the patients. The prevalence of MC by age was 0% for those in their 10 s, 10% for those in their 20 s, 33% for those in their 30 s, 27% for those in their 40 s, 32% for those in their 50 s, 44% for those in their 60 s, 42% for those in their 70 s, and 26% for those in their 80 s. By type, 3.3% were MT1, 81.3% were MT2, 0.5% were MT3, and 14.8% were mixed type. Conclusion. The prevalence of MC increased with age to some degree, with the highest frequency observed in individuals in their 60 s before declining in those in their 70 s and 80 s. These findings suggest that MC might not simply progress with age, particularly after the seventh decade of life.

AB - Study Design. Cross-sectional imaging study. Objective. The aim of this study was to clarify the trend in the generation distinctions about the prevalence of Modic change (MC) including elderly patients. Summary of Background Data. MC has been discussed regarding its clinical significance, relationship with low back pain, suitable treatments, prevalence, and natural history. However, previous reports have focused on younger subjects, with few studies conducted in elderly patients. If MC is actually a progressive condition of a patient, then it should become more common as the patient ages. We herein report the distribution of MC across several age groups. Methods. Patients who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution from April 2013 to March 2015 were recruited. MC was assessed using T1-and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and divided into Modic types (MT) 1, 2, and 3, and mixed type. Trends in the prevalence of MC were analyzed based on age. Results. We ultimately included 585 patients of an initial 937 who underwent lumbar MRI. The mean age was 65 years. MC was identified in 36.0% of the patients. The prevalence of MC by age was 0% for those in their 10 s, 10% for those in their 20 s, 33% for those in their 30 s, 27% for those in their 40 s, 32% for those in their 50 s, 44% for those in their 60 s, 42% for those in their 70 s, and 26% for those in their 80 s. By type, 3.3% were MT1, 81.3% were MT2, 0.5% were MT3, and 14.8% were mixed type. Conclusion. The prevalence of MC increased with age to some degree, with the highest frequency observed in individuals in their 60 s before declining in those in their 70 s and 80 s. These findings suggest that MC might not simply progress with age, particularly after the seventh decade of life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019667237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019667237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002254

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002254

M3 - Article

C2 - 28548999

AN - SCOPUS:85019667237

VL - 42

SP - 1805

EP - 1809

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 23

ER -