Dosimetry of pulsed clinical proton beams by a small ionization chamber

Akihiro Nohtomi, T. Sakae, Y. Tsunashima, R. Kohno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Response of a micro volume (0.01 ml) ionization chamber has been studied with pulsed proton beams which are used for clinical purposes and has been compared with those of some JARP ionization chambers (0.6 ml). All chambers used had been calibrated by standard 60Co beams at the Electrotechnical Laboratory (ETL) and exposure calibration factors, Nx, were obtained on advance. Two methods are used to compensate the general recombination which occurs during pulsed beam irradiations: theoretical correction by a Boag's formulation and a modified two-voltage technique. An evaluation of absolute absorbed dose-to-water is performed on the basis of the protocol provided by ICRU report 59. The results imply that, to a first approximation, both chambers indicate the almost same result within 2% when unknown chamber-dependent parameters of the micro chamber are tentatively assumed to be identical to those of the JARP chamber for the calibration with 60Co beams. The about 1.5% discrepancy observed in the response of both chambers is not discussible due to presumably 1-2% uncertainty of the protocol of ICRU report 59 which does not include any chamber-dependent corrections for the perturbation effects in proton beams.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1431-1435
Number of pages5
JournalMedical physics
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Calibration
Protons
Genetic Recombination
Uncertainty
Water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Dosimetry of pulsed clinical proton beams by a small ionization chamber. / Nohtomi, Akihiro; Sakae, T.; Tsunashima, Y.; Kohno, R.

In: Medical physics, Vol. 28, No. 7, 01.01.2001, p. 1431-1435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nohtomi, Akihiro ; Sakae, T. ; Tsunashima, Y. ; Kohno, R. / Dosimetry of pulsed clinical proton beams by a small ionization chamber. In: Medical physics. 2001 ; Vol. 28, No. 7. pp. 1431-1435.
@article{648b01e2f9e241e6b070a35d2ee64077,
title = "Dosimetry of pulsed clinical proton beams by a small ionization chamber",
abstract = "Response of a micro volume (0.01 ml) ionization chamber has been studied with pulsed proton beams which are used for clinical purposes and has been compared with those of some JARP ionization chambers (0.6 ml). All chambers used had been calibrated by standard 60Co beams at the Electrotechnical Laboratory (ETL) and exposure calibration factors, Nx, were obtained on advance. Two methods are used to compensate the general recombination which occurs during pulsed beam irradiations: theoretical correction by a Boag's formulation and a modified two-voltage technique. An evaluation of absolute absorbed dose-to-water is performed on the basis of the protocol provided by ICRU report 59. The results imply that, to a first approximation, both chambers indicate the almost same result within 2{\%} when unknown chamber-dependent parameters of the micro chamber are tentatively assumed to be identical to those of the JARP chamber for the calibration with 60Co beams. The about 1.5{\%} discrepancy observed in the response of both chambers is not discussible due to presumably 1-2{\%} uncertainty of the protocol of ICRU report 59 which does not include any chamber-dependent corrections for the perturbation effects in proton beams.",
author = "Akihiro Nohtomi and T. Sakae and Y. Tsunashima and R. Kohno",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.1380435",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1431--1435",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetry of pulsed clinical proton beams by a small ionization chamber

AU - Nohtomi, Akihiro

AU - Sakae, T.

AU - Tsunashima, Y.

AU - Kohno, R.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Response of a micro volume (0.01 ml) ionization chamber has been studied with pulsed proton beams which are used for clinical purposes and has been compared with those of some JARP ionization chambers (0.6 ml). All chambers used had been calibrated by standard 60Co beams at the Electrotechnical Laboratory (ETL) and exposure calibration factors, Nx, were obtained on advance. Two methods are used to compensate the general recombination which occurs during pulsed beam irradiations: theoretical correction by a Boag's formulation and a modified two-voltage technique. An evaluation of absolute absorbed dose-to-water is performed on the basis of the protocol provided by ICRU report 59. The results imply that, to a first approximation, both chambers indicate the almost same result within 2% when unknown chamber-dependent parameters of the micro chamber are tentatively assumed to be identical to those of the JARP chamber for the calibration with 60Co beams. The about 1.5% discrepancy observed in the response of both chambers is not discussible due to presumably 1-2% uncertainty of the protocol of ICRU report 59 which does not include any chamber-dependent corrections for the perturbation effects in proton beams.

AB - Response of a micro volume (0.01 ml) ionization chamber has been studied with pulsed proton beams which are used for clinical purposes and has been compared with those of some JARP ionization chambers (0.6 ml). All chambers used had been calibrated by standard 60Co beams at the Electrotechnical Laboratory (ETL) and exposure calibration factors, Nx, were obtained on advance. Two methods are used to compensate the general recombination which occurs during pulsed beam irradiations: theoretical correction by a Boag's formulation and a modified two-voltage technique. An evaluation of absolute absorbed dose-to-water is performed on the basis of the protocol provided by ICRU report 59. The results imply that, to a first approximation, both chambers indicate the almost same result within 2% when unknown chamber-dependent parameters of the micro chamber are tentatively assumed to be identical to those of the JARP chamber for the calibration with 60Co beams. The about 1.5% discrepancy observed in the response of both chambers is not discussible due to presumably 1-2% uncertainty of the protocol of ICRU report 59 which does not include any chamber-dependent corrections for the perturbation effects in proton beams.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034920083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034920083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1380435

DO - 10.1118/1.1380435

M3 - Article

C2 - 11488575

AN - SCOPUS:0034920083

VL - 28

SP - 1431

EP - 1435

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 7

ER -