Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study over Asia: Overview

I. Uno, Zifa Wang, M. Chiba, Y. S. Chun, Sun Ling Gong, Y. Hara, E. Jung, S. S. Lee, M. Liu, M. Mikami, S. Music, S. Nickovic, S. Satake, Y. Shao, Zhenxin Song, N. Sugimoto, T. Tanaka, D. L. Westphal

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intercomparison study involving eight dust emission/transport models over Asia (DMIP) has been completed. Participating dust models utilize a variety of dust emission schemes, horizontal and vertical resolutions, numerical methods, and different meteorological models. Two huge dust episodes occurred in spring 2002 and were used for the DMIP study. Meteorological parameters, dust emission flux and dust concentration (diameter < 20 μm) are compared within the same domain on the basis of PM and NIES lidar measurements. We found that modeled dust concentrations between the 25% and 75% percentiles generally agreed with the PM observations. The model results correctly captured the major dust onset and cessation timing at each observation site. However, the maximum concentration of each model was 2-4 times different. Dust emission fluxes from the Taklimakan Desert and Mongolia differ immensely among the models, indicating that the dust source allocation scheme over these regions differs greatly among the various modeling groups. This suggests the measurements of dust flux and accurate updated land use information are important to improve the models over these regions. The dust vertical concentration profile at Beijing, China, and Nagasaki, Japan, has a large scatter (more than two times different) among the models. For Beijing, the scaled dust profile has a quite similar vertical profile and shows relatively good agreement with the lidar extinction profile. However, for Nagasaki, the scaled dust profiles do not agree. These results indicate that modeling of dust transport and removal processes between China and Japan is another important issue in improving dust modeling.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberD12213
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Volume111
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 27 2006

Fingerprint

dust
Dust
dust emissions
lidar
China
Asia
profiles
Optical radar
Fluxes
optical radar
Japan
meteorological parameters
Mongolia
modeling
land use
deserts
extinction
Land use
vertical profile
numerical method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study over Asia : Overview. / Uno, I.; Wang, Zifa; Chiba, M.; Chun, Y. S.; Gong, Sun Ling; Hara, Y.; Jung, E.; Lee, S. S.; Liu, M.; Mikami, M.; Music, S.; Nickovic, S.; Satake, S.; Shao, Y.; Song, Zhenxin; Sugimoto, N.; Tanaka, T.; Westphal, D. L.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 111, No. 12, D12213, 27.06.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Uno, I, Wang, Z, Chiba, M, Chun, YS, Gong, SL, Hara, Y, Jung, E, Lee, SS, Liu, M, Mikami, M, Music, S, Nickovic, S, Satake, S, Shao, Y, Song, Z, Sugimoto, N, Tanaka, T & Westphal, DL 2006, 'Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study over Asia: Overview', Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 111, no. 12, D12213. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006575
Uno, I. ; Wang, Zifa ; Chiba, M. ; Chun, Y. S. ; Gong, Sun Ling ; Hara, Y. ; Jung, E. ; Lee, S. S. ; Liu, M. ; Mikami, M. ; Music, S. ; Nickovic, S. ; Satake, S. ; Shao, Y. ; Song, Zhenxin ; Sugimoto, N. ; Tanaka, T. ; Westphal, D. L. / Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study over Asia : Overview. In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2006 ; Vol. 111, No. 12.
@article{6d1fab33571247b9830040408a2007f0,
title = "Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study over Asia: Overview",
abstract = "An intercomparison study involving eight dust emission/transport models over Asia (DMIP) has been completed. Participating dust models utilize a variety of dust emission schemes, horizontal and vertical resolutions, numerical methods, and different meteorological models. Two huge dust episodes occurred in spring 2002 and were used for the DMIP study. Meteorological parameters, dust emission flux and dust concentration (diameter < 20 μm) are compared within the same domain on the basis of PM and NIES lidar measurements. We found that modeled dust concentrations between the 25{\%} and 75{\%} percentiles generally agreed with the PM observations. The model results correctly captured the major dust onset and cessation timing at each observation site. However, the maximum concentration of each model was 2-4 times different. Dust emission fluxes from the Taklimakan Desert and Mongolia differ immensely among the models, indicating that the dust source allocation scheme over these regions differs greatly among the various modeling groups. This suggests the measurements of dust flux and accurate updated land use information are important to improve the models over these regions. The dust vertical concentration profile at Beijing, China, and Nagasaki, Japan, has a large scatter (more than two times different) among the models. For Beijing, the scaled dust profile has a quite similar vertical profile and shows relatively good agreement with the lidar extinction profile. However, for Nagasaki, the scaled dust profiles do not agree. These results indicate that modeling of dust transport and removal processes between China and Japan is another important issue in improving dust modeling.",
author = "I. Uno and Zifa Wang and M. Chiba and Chun, {Y. S.} and Gong, {Sun Ling} and Y. Hara and E. Jung and Lee, {S. S.} and M. Liu and M. Mikami and S. Music and S. Nickovic and S. Satake and Y. Shao and Zhenxin Song and N. Sugimoto and T. Tanaka and Westphal, {D. L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1029/2005JD006575",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dust model intercomparison (DMIP) study over Asia

T2 - Overview

AU - Uno, I.

AU - Wang, Zifa

AU - Chiba, M.

AU - Chun, Y. S.

AU - Gong, Sun Ling

AU - Hara, Y.

AU - Jung, E.

AU - Lee, S. S.

AU - Liu, M.

AU - Mikami, M.

AU - Music, S.

AU - Nickovic, S.

AU - Satake, S.

AU - Shao, Y.

AU - Song, Zhenxin

AU - Sugimoto, N.

AU - Tanaka, T.

AU - Westphal, D. L.

PY - 2006/6/27

Y1 - 2006/6/27

N2 - An intercomparison study involving eight dust emission/transport models over Asia (DMIP) has been completed. Participating dust models utilize a variety of dust emission schemes, horizontal and vertical resolutions, numerical methods, and different meteorological models. Two huge dust episodes occurred in spring 2002 and were used for the DMIP study. Meteorological parameters, dust emission flux and dust concentration (diameter < 20 μm) are compared within the same domain on the basis of PM and NIES lidar measurements. We found that modeled dust concentrations between the 25% and 75% percentiles generally agreed with the PM observations. The model results correctly captured the major dust onset and cessation timing at each observation site. However, the maximum concentration of each model was 2-4 times different. Dust emission fluxes from the Taklimakan Desert and Mongolia differ immensely among the models, indicating that the dust source allocation scheme over these regions differs greatly among the various modeling groups. This suggests the measurements of dust flux and accurate updated land use information are important to improve the models over these regions. The dust vertical concentration profile at Beijing, China, and Nagasaki, Japan, has a large scatter (more than two times different) among the models. For Beijing, the scaled dust profile has a quite similar vertical profile and shows relatively good agreement with the lidar extinction profile. However, for Nagasaki, the scaled dust profiles do not agree. These results indicate that modeling of dust transport and removal processes between China and Japan is another important issue in improving dust modeling.

AB - An intercomparison study involving eight dust emission/transport models over Asia (DMIP) has been completed. Participating dust models utilize a variety of dust emission schemes, horizontal and vertical resolutions, numerical methods, and different meteorological models. Two huge dust episodes occurred in spring 2002 and were used for the DMIP study. Meteorological parameters, dust emission flux and dust concentration (diameter < 20 μm) are compared within the same domain on the basis of PM and NIES lidar measurements. We found that modeled dust concentrations between the 25% and 75% percentiles generally agreed with the PM observations. The model results correctly captured the major dust onset and cessation timing at each observation site. However, the maximum concentration of each model was 2-4 times different. Dust emission fluxes from the Taklimakan Desert and Mongolia differ immensely among the models, indicating that the dust source allocation scheme over these regions differs greatly among the various modeling groups. This suggests the measurements of dust flux and accurate updated land use information are important to improve the models over these regions. The dust vertical concentration profile at Beijing, China, and Nagasaki, Japan, has a large scatter (more than two times different) among the models. For Beijing, the scaled dust profile has a quite similar vertical profile and shows relatively good agreement with the lidar extinction profile. However, for Nagasaki, the scaled dust profiles do not agree. These results indicate that modeling of dust transport and removal processes between China and Japan is another important issue in improving dust modeling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750606243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750606243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2005JD006575

DO - 10.1029/2005JD006575

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33750606243

VL - 111

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 12

M1 - D12213

ER -