TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamics of water–energy–food nexus methodology, methods, and tools
AU - Endo, Aiko
AU - Yamada, Makoto
AU - Miyashita, Yuji
AU - Sugimoto, Ryo
AU - Ishii, Akira
AU - Nishijima, Jun
AU - Fujii, Masahiko
AU - Kato, Takaaki
AU - Hamamoto, Hideki
AU - Kimura, Michinori
AU - Kumazawa, Terukazu
AU - Qi, Jiaguo
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Land Cover and Land Use Program grant ( NNX15AD51G ) and Interdisciplinary Research in Earth Science grant ( 80NSSC17K0259 ). This work was also supported by Program 2, ‘Fair Use and Management of Diverse Resources,’ funded by the RIHN .
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Land Cover and Land Use Program grant (NNX15AD51G) and Interdisciplinary Research in Earth Science grant (80NSSC17K0259). This work was also supported by Program 2, ‘Fair Use and Management of Diverse Resources,’ funded by the RIHN. Table 2 was created based on the results of the RIHN project [grant number 14200097]. The authors also would like to particularly thank User Local, Inc. for their support for the keyword analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - A review was conducted to understand the current status of the water–energy–food nexus, focusing on its methodology, and the process through which the nexus approach has academically and geographically expanded across and synthesized more than one discourse, discipline, and domain via its methodology as interdisciplinary and integrated approaches. The review article types were categorized into five groups and comprehensively analyzed. Various indicators to assess the nexus methods and tools, reported in previous studies, that can be used to select appropriate methods and tools for methodology and research designs. The studies in the reviewed articles were characterized by various stages of interdisciplinary research. In addition, the water–energy–food nexus initiatives, which generalize methods and tools, applying mixed methods to the replicability of specific case studies, were discussed based on the findings.
AB - A review was conducted to understand the current status of the water–energy–food nexus, focusing on its methodology, and the process through which the nexus approach has academically and geographically expanded across and synthesized more than one discourse, discipline, and domain via its methodology as interdisciplinary and integrated approaches. The review article types were categorized into five groups and comprehensively analyzed. Various indicators to assess the nexus methods and tools, reported in previous studies, that can be used to select appropriate methods and tools for methodology and research designs. The studies in the reviewed articles were characterized by various stages of interdisciplinary research. In addition, the water–energy–food nexus initiatives, which generalize methods and tools, applying mixed methods to the replicability of specific case studies, were discussed based on the findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075988739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075988739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.coesh.2019.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.coesh.2019.10.004
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85075988739
SN - 2468-5844
VL - 13
SP - 46
EP - 60
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
ER -
