Economic Evaluation of the Aso Grassland Landscape by Contingent Valuation Method

Comparative Analysis of Donation and Taxreallocation Payment Vehicles

Mitsuyasu Yabe, Kosaku Nitta, Motoyuki Goda, Eiichiro Nishizawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We have evaluated the Aso grassland landscape by contingent valuation method and analyzed the effect of paying methods, and attributes of respondents on the estimates. In doing so, it will make helpful policy-makers to develop conservation instruments for grassland landscape. The survey was conducted in December 1998, the survey areas are Kumamoto Prefecture that has the Aso grassland and Tokyo, and the rate of response against the number of inquiries delivered is about 30~40%. We have set two payment vehicles; making a fund by donation and a tax reallocation of budget. First, the prospect for trip to Aso area in the next five years has no effect on WTP by both payment vehicles. This means that the value of conservation of grassland landscape might be considered not as use value but as non-use value. Thus, in addition to user payment, the payment by government would be also a reasonable policy instrument. Secondly, we found that in the payment vehicles of donation, the mean of willingness to pay (WTP) has no difference between Tokyo and Kumamoto, but in tax reallocation the mean of WTP in Kumamoto is higher than that in Tokyo. This is due to that Kumamoto has more concern about the conservation of Aso grassland landscape and less income than Tokyo. Thus, it would be appropriate that local government shares a part of the conservation costs. Thirdly, the subjective probability of conservation by policy scenario has a positive effect on WTP in both payment vehicles. Therefore, the supply of easy-to-understand information for public is very important for policy makers. Lastly, as the mean of donation is 2,091 yen per household, the total value of conserving Aso grassland is estimated around 1.24 billion yen annually for citizen of Kumamoto Prefecture, and using the sample return rate 0.412, the median 1,000 yen, and total household numbers 594,197, the reasonable project budget of conservation for the Prefecture is valued at 245 million yen.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-195
Number of pages13
JournalStudies in Regional Science
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

contingent valuation
donation
conservation
grassland
willingness to pay
evaluation
economics
taxes
budget
local government
vehicle
method
analysis
income
supply
scenario
citizen
costs
cost
effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Economic Evaluation of the Aso Grassland Landscape by Contingent Valuation Method : Comparative Analysis of Donation and Taxreallocation Payment Vehicles. / Yabe, Mitsuyasu; Nitta, Kosaku; Goda, Motoyuki; Nishizawa, Eiichiro.

In: Studies in Regional Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.1999, p. 183-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd0d6d42ffac407481fbff12d50355c4,
title = "Economic Evaluation of the Aso Grassland Landscape by Contingent Valuation Method: Comparative Analysis of Donation and Taxreallocation Payment Vehicles",
abstract = "We have evaluated the Aso grassland landscape by contingent valuation method and analyzed the effect of paying methods, and attributes of respondents on the estimates. In doing so, it will make helpful policy-makers to develop conservation instruments for grassland landscape. The survey was conducted in December 1998, the survey areas are Kumamoto Prefecture that has the Aso grassland and Tokyo, and the rate of response against the number of inquiries delivered is about 30~40{\%}. We have set two payment vehicles; making a fund by donation and a tax reallocation of budget. First, the prospect for trip to Aso area in the next five years has no effect on WTP by both payment vehicles. This means that the value of conservation of grassland landscape might be considered not as use value but as non-use value. Thus, in addition to user payment, the payment by government would be also a reasonable policy instrument. Secondly, we found that in the payment vehicles of donation, the mean of willingness to pay (WTP) has no difference between Tokyo and Kumamoto, but in tax reallocation the mean of WTP in Kumamoto is higher than that in Tokyo. This is due to that Kumamoto has more concern about the conservation of Aso grassland landscape and less income than Tokyo. Thus, it would be appropriate that local government shares a part of the conservation costs. Thirdly, the subjective probability of conservation by policy scenario has a positive effect on WTP in both payment vehicles. Therefore, the supply of easy-to-understand information for public is very important for policy makers. Lastly, as the mean of donation is 2,091 yen per household, the total value of conserving Aso grassland is estimated around 1.24 billion yen annually for citizen of Kumamoto Prefecture, and using the sample return rate 0.412, the median 1,000 yen, and total household numbers 594,197, the reasonable project budget of conservation for the Prefecture is valued at 245 million yen.",
author = "Mitsuyasu Yabe and Kosaku Nitta and Motoyuki Goda and Eiichiro Nishizawa",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2457/srs.30.183",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "183--195",
journal = "Studies in Regional Science",
issn = "0287-6256",
publisher = "The Japan Section of the Regional Science Association International",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic Evaluation of the Aso Grassland Landscape by Contingent Valuation Method

T2 - Comparative Analysis of Donation and Taxreallocation Payment Vehicles

AU - Yabe, Mitsuyasu

AU - Nitta, Kosaku

AU - Goda, Motoyuki

AU - Nishizawa, Eiichiro

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - We have evaluated the Aso grassland landscape by contingent valuation method and analyzed the effect of paying methods, and attributes of respondents on the estimates. In doing so, it will make helpful policy-makers to develop conservation instruments for grassland landscape. The survey was conducted in December 1998, the survey areas are Kumamoto Prefecture that has the Aso grassland and Tokyo, and the rate of response against the number of inquiries delivered is about 30~40%. We have set two payment vehicles; making a fund by donation and a tax reallocation of budget. First, the prospect for trip to Aso area in the next five years has no effect on WTP by both payment vehicles. This means that the value of conservation of grassland landscape might be considered not as use value but as non-use value. Thus, in addition to user payment, the payment by government would be also a reasonable policy instrument. Secondly, we found that in the payment vehicles of donation, the mean of willingness to pay (WTP) has no difference between Tokyo and Kumamoto, but in tax reallocation the mean of WTP in Kumamoto is higher than that in Tokyo. This is due to that Kumamoto has more concern about the conservation of Aso grassland landscape and less income than Tokyo. Thus, it would be appropriate that local government shares a part of the conservation costs. Thirdly, the subjective probability of conservation by policy scenario has a positive effect on WTP in both payment vehicles. Therefore, the supply of easy-to-understand information for public is very important for policy makers. Lastly, as the mean of donation is 2,091 yen per household, the total value of conserving Aso grassland is estimated around 1.24 billion yen annually for citizen of Kumamoto Prefecture, and using the sample return rate 0.412, the median 1,000 yen, and total household numbers 594,197, the reasonable project budget of conservation for the Prefecture is valued at 245 million yen.

AB - We have evaluated the Aso grassland landscape by contingent valuation method and analyzed the effect of paying methods, and attributes of respondents on the estimates. In doing so, it will make helpful policy-makers to develop conservation instruments for grassland landscape. The survey was conducted in December 1998, the survey areas are Kumamoto Prefecture that has the Aso grassland and Tokyo, and the rate of response against the number of inquiries delivered is about 30~40%. We have set two payment vehicles; making a fund by donation and a tax reallocation of budget. First, the prospect for trip to Aso area in the next five years has no effect on WTP by both payment vehicles. This means that the value of conservation of grassland landscape might be considered not as use value but as non-use value. Thus, in addition to user payment, the payment by government would be also a reasonable policy instrument. Secondly, we found that in the payment vehicles of donation, the mean of willingness to pay (WTP) has no difference between Tokyo and Kumamoto, but in tax reallocation the mean of WTP in Kumamoto is higher than that in Tokyo. This is due to that Kumamoto has more concern about the conservation of Aso grassland landscape and less income than Tokyo. Thus, it would be appropriate that local government shares a part of the conservation costs. Thirdly, the subjective probability of conservation by policy scenario has a positive effect on WTP in both payment vehicles. Therefore, the supply of easy-to-understand information for public is very important for policy makers. Lastly, as the mean of donation is 2,091 yen per household, the total value of conserving Aso grassland is estimated around 1.24 billion yen annually for citizen of Kumamoto Prefecture, and using the sample return rate 0.412, the median 1,000 yen, and total household numbers 594,197, the reasonable project budget of conservation for the Prefecture is valued at 245 million yen.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78549232860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78549232860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2457/srs.30.183

DO - 10.2457/srs.30.183

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 183

EP - 195

JO - Studies in Regional Science

JF - Studies in Regional Science

SN - 0287-6256

IS - 1

ER -