Effect of clenching on T2 and diffusion parameters of the masseter muscle

Toru Chikui, Tomoko Shiraishi, Takahiro Ichihara, Toshiyuki Kawazu, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Yukiko Kami, Kenji Yuasa, Kazunori Yoshiura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Persistent muscle contractions during clenching are considered to be one reason for temporomandibular disorders. However, no report has evaluated the effect of clenching on the masticatory muscles, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: To investigate whether clenching has an effect on either T2 or the coefficients for diffusion of the masseter muscles (MM), and to evaluate the effect of the distribution of bite force on such indices. Material and Methods: Twenty-three subjects were examined. Bite force was measured by a pressure-sensitive sheet, and the force of the right and the left sides was calculated. MRI was used to evaluate T2, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the primary (λ1), secondary (λ2), and tertiary eigenvalues (λ3). These indices on the stronger side of the bite force were compared to those on the weaker side. Thereafter, the indices were compared between at rest and during clenching. Results: There was no significant difference in any of the indices (T2, ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3) between the side of stronger bite force and the side with weaker. T2 increased by clenching, and the difference was significant in the side with stronger bite force (P 0.006). ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3 increased significantly by clenching (P <0.01, P <0.01, P <0.01, and P <0.01, respectively) on both sides. The percentage of change of λ2 by clenching was 26.2±15.7% on the stronger side and 26.9±18.6% on the weaker side, which was significantly greater than either that of λ1 or λ3. Conclusion: The coefficients for diffusion of the MM were sensitive to change by clenching, and λ2 was the most sensitive. Moreover, the relative distribution of the bite forces had no effect on any of the indices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-63
Number of pages6
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 5 2010

Fingerprint

Bite Force
Masseter Muscle
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Masticatory Muscles
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Muscle Contraction
Pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Effect of clenching on T2 and diffusion parameters of the masseter muscle. / Chikui, Toru; Shiraishi, Tomoko; Ichihara, Takahiro; Kawazu, Toshiyuki; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu; Kami, Yukiko; Yuasa, Kenji; Yoshiura, Kazunori.

In: Acta Radiologica, Vol. 51, No. 1, 05.02.2010, p. 58-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chikui, Toru ; Shiraishi, Tomoko ; Ichihara, Takahiro ; Kawazu, Toshiyuki ; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu ; Kami, Yukiko ; Yuasa, Kenji ; Yoshiura, Kazunori. / Effect of clenching on T2 and diffusion parameters of the masseter muscle. In: Acta Radiologica. 2010 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 58-63.
@article{071263f27b36411abc62fc3f9e9bb7f6,
title = "Effect of clenching on T2 and diffusion parameters of the masseter muscle",
abstract = "Background: Persistent muscle contractions during clenching are considered to be one reason for temporomandibular disorders. However, no report has evaluated the effect of clenching on the masticatory muscles, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: To investigate whether clenching has an effect on either T2 or the coefficients for diffusion of the masseter muscles (MM), and to evaluate the effect of the distribution of bite force on such indices. Material and Methods: Twenty-three subjects were examined. Bite force was measured by a pressure-sensitive sheet, and the force of the right and the left sides was calculated. MRI was used to evaluate T2, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the primary (λ1), secondary (λ2), and tertiary eigenvalues (λ3). These indices on the stronger side of the bite force were compared to those on the weaker side. Thereafter, the indices were compared between at rest and during clenching. Results: There was no significant difference in any of the indices (T2, ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3) between the side of stronger bite force and the side with weaker. T2 increased by clenching, and the difference was significant in the side with stronger bite force (P 0.006). ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3 increased significantly by clenching (P <0.01, P <0.01, P <0.01, and P <0.01, respectively) on both sides. The percentage of change of λ2 by clenching was 26.2±15.7{\%} on the stronger side and 26.9±18.6{\%} on the weaker side, which was significantly greater than either that of λ1 or λ3. Conclusion: The coefficients for diffusion of the MM were sensitive to change by clenching, and λ2 was the most sensitive. Moreover, the relative distribution of the bite forces had no effect on any of the indices.",
author = "Toru Chikui and Tomoko Shiraishi and Takahiro Ichihara and Toshiyuki Kawazu and Masamitsu Hatakenaka and Yukiko Kami and Kenji Yuasa and Kazunori Yoshiura",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.3109/02841850903280508",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "58--63",
journal = "Acta Radiologica",
issn = "0284-1851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of clenching on T2 and diffusion parameters of the masseter muscle

AU - Chikui, Toru

AU - Shiraishi, Tomoko

AU - Ichihara, Takahiro

AU - Kawazu, Toshiyuki

AU - Hatakenaka, Masamitsu

AU - Kami, Yukiko

AU - Yuasa, Kenji

AU - Yoshiura, Kazunori

PY - 2010/2/5

Y1 - 2010/2/5

N2 - Background: Persistent muscle contractions during clenching are considered to be one reason for temporomandibular disorders. However, no report has evaluated the effect of clenching on the masticatory muscles, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: To investigate whether clenching has an effect on either T2 or the coefficients for diffusion of the masseter muscles (MM), and to evaluate the effect of the distribution of bite force on such indices. Material and Methods: Twenty-three subjects were examined. Bite force was measured by a pressure-sensitive sheet, and the force of the right and the left sides was calculated. MRI was used to evaluate T2, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the primary (λ1), secondary (λ2), and tertiary eigenvalues (λ3). These indices on the stronger side of the bite force were compared to those on the weaker side. Thereafter, the indices were compared between at rest and during clenching. Results: There was no significant difference in any of the indices (T2, ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3) between the side of stronger bite force and the side with weaker. T2 increased by clenching, and the difference was significant in the side with stronger bite force (P 0.006). ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3 increased significantly by clenching (P <0.01, P <0.01, P <0.01, and P <0.01, respectively) on both sides. The percentage of change of λ2 by clenching was 26.2±15.7% on the stronger side and 26.9±18.6% on the weaker side, which was significantly greater than either that of λ1 or λ3. Conclusion: The coefficients for diffusion of the MM were sensitive to change by clenching, and λ2 was the most sensitive. Moreover, the relative distribution of the bite forces had no effect on any of the indices.

AB - Background: Persistent muscle contractions during clenching are considered to be one reason for temporomandibular disorders. However, no report has evaluated the effect of clenching on the masticatory muscles, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: To investigate whether clenching has an effect on either T2 or the coefficients for diffusion of the masseter muscles (MM), and to evaluate the effect of the distribution of bite force on such indices. Material and Methods: Twenty-three subjects were examined. Bite force was measured by a pressure-sensitive sheet, and the force of the right and the left sides was calculated. MRI was used to evaluate T2, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the primary (λ1), secondary (λ2), and tertiary eigenvalues (λ3). These indices on the stronger side of the bite force were compared to those on the weaker side. Thereafter, the indices were compared between at rest and during clenching. Results: There was no significant difference in any of the indices (T2, ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3) between the side of stronger bite force and the side with weaker. T2 increased by clenching, and the difference was significant in the side with stronger bite force (P 0.006). ADC, λ1, λ2, and λ3 increased significantly by clenching (P <0.01, P <0.01, P <0.01, and P <0.01, respectively) on both sides. The percentage of change of λ2 by clenching was 26.2±15.7% on the stronger side and 26.9±18.6% on the weaker side, which was significantly greater than either that of λ1 or λ3. Conclusion: The coefficients for diffusion of the MM were sensitive to change by clenching, and λ2 was the most sensitive. Moreover, the relative distribution of the bite forces had no effect on any of the indices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75649097449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75649097449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02841850903280508

DO - 10.3109/02841850903280508

M3 - Article

C2 - 20001471

AN - SCOPUS:75649097449

VL - 51

SP - 58

EP - 63

JO - Acta Radiologica

JF - Acta Radiologica

SN - 0284-1851

IS - 1

ER -