TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of prosthetic restoration on masticatory function in patients with shortened dental arches
T2 - a multicentre study
AU - Fueki, K.
AU - Igarashi, Y.
AU - Maeda, Y.
AU - Baba, K.
AU - Koyano, K.
AU - Sasaki, K.
AU - Akagawa, Y.
AU - Kuboki, T.
AU - Kasugai, S.
AU - Garrett, N. R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank collaborative researchers of this study, Drs. E. Kono, T. Sugiura, K. Ikebe, H. Tukasaki, Y. Ogino, S. Koyama, K. Koretake and H. Arakawa for their kind assistance with data collection and analyses. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (No. 20249077) from the MEXT of Japan. There is no potential conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - The aim of this multicentre study was to investigate the effect of prosthetic restoration for missing posterior teeth on mastication in patients with shortened dental arches (SDAs). Partially dentate patients who had an intact teeth in anterior region and missed distal molar(s) (2-12 missing occlusal units) classified as Kennedy Class I or Class II were recruited from seven university-based dental hospitals in Japan. Of the 125 subjects who underwent baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up/post-treatment evaluation, 53 chose no replacement of missing teeth and 72 chose treatment with removable partial dentures (n = 53) or implant-supported fixed partial dentures (n = 19). Objective masticatory performance (MP) was evaluated using a gummy jelly test. Perception of chewing ability (CA) was rated using a food intake questionnaire. In the no-treatment group, mean MP and CA scores at baseline were similar to those at follow-up evaluation (P > 0·05). In the treatment group, mean MP after treatment was significantly greater than the pre-treatment mean MP (P < 0·05). However, the mean perceived CA in the treatment groups was similar at pre- and post-treatment (P > 0·05). In a subgroup analysis of subjects in the treatment group, subjects with lower pre-treatment CA showed a significant CA increase after treatment (P = 0·004), but those with higher pre-treatment CA showed a significant decrease in CA (P = 0·001). These results suggest that prosthetic restoration for SDAs may benefit objective masticatory performance in patients needing replacement of missing posterior teeth, but the benefit in subjective chewing ability seems to be limited in subjects with perceived impairment in chewing ability before treatment.
AB - The aim of this multicentre study was to investigate the effect of prosthetic restoration for missing posterior teeth on mastication in patients with shortened dental arches (SDAs). Partially dentate patients who had an intact teeth in anterior region and missed distal molar(s) (2-12 missing occlusal units) classified as Kennedy Class I or Class II were recruited from seven university-based dental hospitals in Japan. Of the 125 subjects who underwent baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up/post-treatment evaluation, 53 chose no replacement of missing teeth and 72 chose treatment with removable partial dentures (n = 53) or implant-supported fixed partial dentures (n = 19). Objective masticatory performance (MP) was evaluated using a gummy jelly test. Perception of chewing ability (CA) was rated using a food intake questionnaire. In the no-treatment group, mean MP and CA scores at baseline were similar to those at follow-up evaluation (P > 0·05). In the treatment group, mean MP after treatment was significantly greater than the pre-treatment mean MP (P < 0·05). However, the mean perceived CA in the treatment groups was similar at pre- and post-treatment (P > 0·05). In a subgroup analysis of subjects in the treatment group, subjects with lower pre-treatment CA showed a significant CA increase after treatment (P = 0·004), but those with higher pre-treatment CA showed a significant decrease in CA (P = 0·001). These results suggest that prosthetic restoration for SDAs may benefit objective masticatory performance in patients needing replacement of missing posterior teeth, but the benefit in subjective chewing ability seems to be limited in subjects with perceived impairment in chewing ability before treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027942715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027942715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/joor.12387
DO - 10.1111/joor.12387
M3 - Article
C2 - 26854877
AN - SCOPUS:85027942715
SN - 0305-182X
VL - 43
SP - 534
EP - 542
JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
IS - 7
ER -