TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of condensation and compressive strain on implant primary stability a longitudinal, in vivo, multiscale study in mice
AU - Li, Z.
AU - Arioka, M.
AU - Liu, Y.
AU - Aghvami, M.
AU - Tulu, S.
AU - Brunski, J. B.
AU - Helms, J. A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Aims: Surgeons and most engineers believe that bone compaction improves implant primary stability without causing undue damage to the bone itself. In this study, we developed a murine distal femoral implant model and tested this dogma. Methods: Each mouse received two femoral implants, one placed into a site prepared by drilling and the other into the contralateral site prepared by drilling followed by stepwise condensation. Results: Condensation significantly increased peri-implant bone density but it also produced higher strains at the interface between the bone and implant, which led to significantly more bone microdamage. Despite increased peri-implant bone density, condensation did not improve implant primary stability as measured by an in vivo lateral stability test. Ultimately, the condensed bone underwent resorption, which delayed the onset of new bone formation around the implant. Conclusion: Collectively, these multiscale analyses demonstrate that condensation does not positively contribute to implant stability or to new peri-implant bone formation.
AB - Aims: Surgeons and most engineers believe that bone compaction improves implant primary stability without causing undue damage to the bone itself. In this study, we developed a murine distal femoral implant model and tested this dogma. Methods: Each mouse received two femoral implants, one placed into a site prepared by drilling and the other into the contralateral site prepared by drilling followed by stepwise condensation. Results: Condensation significantly increased peri-implant bone density but it also produced higher strains at the interface between the bone and implant, which led to significantly more bone microdamage. Despite increased peri-implant bone density, condensation did not improve implant primary stability as measured by an in vivo lateral stability test. Ultimately, the condensed bone underwent resorption, which delayed the onset of new bone formation around the implant. Conclusion: Collectively, these multiscale analyses demonstrate that condensation does not positively contribute to implant stability or to new peri-implant bone formation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083188634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083188634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1302/2046-3758.92.BJR-2019-0161
DO - 10.1302/2046-3758.92.BJR-2019-0161
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083188634
SN - 2046-3758
VL - 9
SP - 60
EP - 70
JO - Bone and Joint Research
JF - Bone and Joint Research
IS - 2
ER -