Effects of reversibility on enhanced oil recovery using Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)

Ichhuy Ngo, Falan Srisuriyachai, K. Sasaki, Yuichi Sugai, Ronald Nguele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reduction of interfacial tension (IFT) between residual crude oil and formation fluids in oil reservoirs is the key to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by surfactant flooding. However, adsorption of injected surfactant on minerals in the oil-bearing rock matrix reduces the effectiveness of this method. The present study investigated the effects of surfactant adsorption and desorption in the rock matrix on the oil recovery ratio achieved by surfactant-EOR. Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), a common surfactant in EOR, was used with Berea sandstone samples (rock particles and cores) as adsorbent. Adsorption of SDBS in the samples increased with concentration, and the static saturated amount was 0.9 mg-SDBS/g-rock for 1.0 wt% SDBS-water solution. If brine (1.0 wt% salinity) was injected after saturated adsorption of SDBS in the core, 83 % of adsorbed SDBS was desorbed into the brine (the reversibility effect). To clarify the reversibility effect in oil reservoirs, field scale numerical simulations were conducted for a typical 5 spot model (area: 180 m × 180 m, thickness: 60 m) using core-flooding data reported previously. By introducing the reversibility model into the simulations on of surfactant flooding injection of slugs of 0.1 PV and 0.3 PV into the initial reservoir, oil recovery factor showed differences of 2.3 % and 2.9 % compared to without the model, respectively. Injection of the surfactant solution after water-flooding caused a difference of only 0.4 %.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-198
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Japan Petroleum Institute
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 7 2019

Fingerprint

enhanced oil recovery
sulfonate
surfactant
Surface-Active Agents
Oils
Sodium
sodium
Surface active agents
Recovery
flooding
oil
adsorption
Rocks
Adsorption
rock
brine
Bearings (structural)
matrix
slug
Petroleum reservoirs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Fuel Technology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Effects of reversibility on enhanced oil recovery using Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS). / Ngo, Ichhuy; Srisuriyachai, Falan; Sasaki, K.; Sugai, Yuichi; Nguele, Ronald.

In: Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, Vol. 62, No. 4, 07.07.2019, p. 188-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6266a9c86704d8e971ac078bd517143,
title = "Effects of reversibility on enhanced oil recovery using Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)",
abstract = "Reduction of interfacial tension (IFT) between residual crude oil and formation fluids in oil reservoirs is the key to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by surfactant flooding. However, adsorption of injected surfactant on minerals in the oil-bearing rock matrix reduces the effectiveness of this method. The present study investigated the effects of surfactant adsorption and desorption in the rock matrix on the oil recovery ratio achieved by surfactant-EOR. Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), a common surfactant in EOR, was used with Berea sandstone samples (rock particles and cores) as adsorbent. Adsorption of SDBS in the samples increased with concentration, and the static saturated amount was 0.9 mg-SDBS/g-rock for 1.0 wt{\%} SDBS-water solution. If brine (1.0 wt{\%} salinity) was injected after saturated adsorption of SDBS in the core, 83 {\%} of adsorbed SDBS was desorbed into the brine (the reversibility effect). To clarify the reversibility effect in oil reservoirs, field scale numerical simulations were conducted for a typical 5 spot model (area: 180 m × 180 m, thickness: 60 m) using core-flooding data reported previously. By introducing the reversibility model into the simulations on of surfactant flooding injection of slugs of 0.1 PV and 0.3 PV into the initial reservoir, oil recovery factor showed differences of 2.3 {\%} and 2.9 {\%} compared to without the model, respectively. Injection of the surfactant solution after water-flooding caused a difference of only 0.4 {\%}.",
author = "Ichhuy Ngo and Falan Srisuriyachai and K. Sasaki and Yuichi Sugai and Ronald Nguele",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1627/jpi.62.188",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "188--198",
journal = "Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute",
issn = "1346-8804",
publisher = "Japan Petroleum Institute",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of reversibility on enhanced oil recovery using Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)

AU - Ngo, Ichhuy

AU - Srisuriyachai, Falan

AU - Sasaki, K.

AU - Sugai, Yuichi

AU - Nguele, Ronald

PY - 2019/7/7

Y1 - 2019/7/7

N2 - Reduction of interfacial tension (IFT) between residual crude oil and formation fluids in oil reservoirs is the key to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by surfactant flooding. However, adsorption of injected surfactant on minerals in the oil-bearing rock matrix reduces the effectiveness of this method. The present study investigated the effects of surfactant adsorption and desorption in the rock matrix on the oil recovery ratio achieved by surfactant-EOR. Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), a common surfactant in EOR, was used with Berea sandstone samples (rock particles and cores) as adsorbent. Adsorption of SDBS in the samples increased with concentration, and the static saturated amount was 0.9 mg-SDBS/g-rock for 1.0 wt% SDBS-water solution. If brine (1.0 wt% salinity) was injected after saturated adsorption of SDBS in the core, 83 % of adsorbed SDBS was desorbed into the brine (the reversibility effect). To clarify the reversibility effect in oil reservoirs, field scale numerical simulations were conducted for a typical 5 spot model (area: 180 m × 180 m, thickness: 60 m) using core-flooding data reported previously. By introducing the reversibility model into the simulations on of surfactant flooding injection of slugs of 0.1 PV and 0.3 PV into the initial reservoir, oil recovery factor showed differences of 2.3 % and 2.9 % compared to without the model, respectively. Injection of the surfactant solution after water-flooding caused a difference of only 0.4 %.

AB - Reduction of interfacial tension (IFT) between residual crude oil and formation fluids in oil reservoirs is the key to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by surfactant flooding. However, adsorption of injected surfactant on minerals in the oil-bearing rock matrix reduces the effectiveness of this method. The present study investigated the effects of surfactant adsorption and desorption in the rock matrix on the oil recovery ratio achieved by surfactant-EOR. Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), a common surfactant in EOR, was used with Berea sandstone samples (rock particles and cores) as adsorbent. Adsorption of SDBS in the samples increased with concentration, and the static saturated amount was 0.9 mg-SDBS/g-rock for 1.0 wt% SDBS-water solution. If brine (1.0 wt% salinity) was injected after saturated adsorption of SDBS in the core, 83 % of adsorbed SDBS was desorbed into the brine (the reversibility effect). To clarify the reversibility effect in oil reservoirs, field scale numerical simulations were conducted for a typical 5 spot model (area: 180 m × 180 m, thickness: 60 m) using core-flooding data reported previously. By introducing the reversibility model into the simulations on of surfactant flooding injection of slugs of 0.1 PV and 0.3 PV into the initial reservoir, oil recovery factor showed differences of 2.3 % and 2.9 % compared to without the model, respectively. Injection of the surfactant solution after water-flooding caused a difference of only 0.4 %.

UR - https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpi/62/4/62_188/_article/-char/en

U2 - 10.1627/jpi.62.188

DO - 10.1627/jpi.62.188

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 188

EP - 198

JO - Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute

JF - Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute

SN - 1346-8804

IS - 4

ER -