To investigate the effects of storm flow samplings on the evaluation of DIN and SO42- budgets, we conducted storm flow samplings and discrete interval (weekly) samplings of stream water, throughfall, and stemflow. This investigation lasted for three years and took place in a small forested watershed in western Japan. Annual exports were calculated by the sum of the load (∑Ltotal)sum of the discharge (∑Qtotal) relationships obtained by storm flow samplings. These were then compared to calculated ones that were based on LQ relationships obtained by discrete interval sampling. The results of discrete interval sampling showed that the relationships of DIN or SO42- concentration to the discharge amount found in stream water differed from those of storm flow sampling. This was especially notable in years with higher annual precipitation and subsequent higher annual discharges. Also, exports of DIN and SO4 2during storm flow periods accounted for 83% and 78% of annual exports on 3-year averages, respectively. These results confirmed that storm flow samplings are essential for estimating annual exports of DIN and SO42-. Annual exports that were calculated based on just discrete interval sampling (46% and 17%, respectively) overestimated DIN and SO42- from discrete interval and storm flow samplings on a 3-year average. These overestimates were pronounced in years of higher discharge, and critically affected the rates of net-retention or export of DIN and SO42-. The relationship of smaller input than output of DIN was reversed if storm flow sampling was included.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Water Science and Technology