TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin for the management of overactive bladder symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia
T2 - A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial (DIrecT Study)
AU - Yamanishi, Tomonori
AU - Asakura, Hirotaka
AU - Seki, Narihito
AU - Tokunaga, Shoji
N1 - Funding Information:
H Kakizaki and N Sekido were responsible for the safety review committee. The supporting organization of the study, Clinical Research Support Center Kyushu, was responsible for support of individual study centers, study progress management and data management. WILL Medical Communications assisted the authors with writing the manuscript. This study was funded by Kyorin Pharmaceutical. The funding body had no role, such as the design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and writing of the report in the study. We thank all DIrecT study investigators: Katsuya Nakano, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital; Yoshimasa Kondo, Japanese Red Cross Haga Hospital; Hidetoshi Kinsui, Kamitsuga General Hospital; Kouichi Sakata, Imaichi Hospital; Hirofumi Sakamoto, Saitama Medical University Hospital; Setsuo Watanabe, Watanabe Urological Clinic; Taisuke Ezaki, Saitama City Hospital; Sosuke Sugimura, Kanda Ishin Clinic; Yasutada Onodera, Onodera Clinic; Makoto Endo, Endo Iin; Keiichi Miyakoda, Miyakoda Urological Medicine; Shuso Den, Den Urology; Takehiro Izumi, Izumi Urological Clinic; Yasuhisa Fukuda, Fukuda Clinic (Urology & Dermatology); Taiji Kitano, Kitano Hinyokika clinic; Toru Sumii, Sumii Clinic; Motonori Kano, Kano Hospital; Kazuo Takayama, Takayama Hospital; Kazuya Kawahara, Kawahara Nephro-Urology Clinic; Hideki Tamai, Tamai Clinic; Toshinori Hamashima, Hamashima Urological Clinic; Sadaaki Sakamoto, Nakamura Hospital; Masashi Haraoka, Higashikyushu Clinic of Urology; Yasuhiro Kasagi, Kasagi Urology Clinic; Yasufumi Nabekura, Kumamoto Urological Hospital; Atsushi Migita, Migita Clinic; Toshihiro Yamamoto, Yamamoto Urological Clinic; Masayuki Otani, Nishikumamoto Hospital; Shoji Fujisawa, Tamana Urology Clinic; and Tetsuaki Miyamoto, Mashiki Central Hospital.
Funding Information:
H Kakizaki and N Sekido were responsible for the safety review committee. The supporting organization of the study, Clinical Research Support Center Kyushu, was responsible for support of individual study centers, study progress management and data management. WILL Medical Communications assisted the authors with writing the manuscript. This study was funded by Kyorin Pharmaceutical. The funding body had no role, such as the design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and writing of the report in the study. We thank all DIrecT study investigators: Katsuya Nakano, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital; Yoshimasa Kondo, Japanese Red Cross Haga Hospital; Hidetoshi Kinsui, Kamit-suga General Hospital; Kouichi Sakata, Imaichi Hospital; Hirofumi Sakamoto, Saitama Medical University Hospital; Setsuo Watanabe, Watanabe Urological Clinic; Taisuke Eza-ki, Saitama City Hospital; Sosuke Sugimura, Kanda Ishin Clinic; Yasutada Onodera, Onodera Clinic; Makoto Endo, Endo Iin; Keiichi Miyakoda, Miyakoda Urological Medicine; Shuso Den, Den Urology; Takehiro Izumi, Izumi Urological Clinic; Yasuhisa Fukuda, Fukuda Clinic (Urology & Dermatology); Taiji Kitano, Kitano Hinyokika clinic; Toru Sumii, Sumii Clinic; Motonori Kano, Kano Hospital; Kazuo Takayama, Takayama Hospital; Kazuya Kawahara, Kawahara Nephro-Urology Clinic; Hideki Tamai, Tamai Clinic; Toshi-nori Hamashima, Hamashima Urological Clinic; Sadaaki Sakamoto, Nakamura Hospital; Masashi Haraoka, Higashi-kyushu Clinic of Urology; Yasuhiro Kasagi, Kasagi Urology Clinic; Yasufumi Nabekura, Kumamoto Urological Hospital; Atsushi Migita, Migita Clinic; Toshihiro Yamamoto, Yamamoto Urological Clinic; Masayuki Otani, Nishikumamoto Hospital; Shoji Fujisawa, Tamana Urology Clinic; and Tet-suaki Miyamoto, Mashiki Central Hospital.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Japanese Urological Association
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy with dutasteride and imidafenacin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and persistent overactive bladder symptoms. Methods: A total of 163 patients presenting an enlarged prostate (volume >30 mL) and persistent overactive bladder symptoms despite at least 8 weeks of tamsulosin were randomized to receive tamsulosin and dutasteride, or tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin at a 1:1 ratio. The primary end-point was the mean change from baseline to week 24 in total overactive bladder symptom score. Results: The mean change in total overactive bladder symptom score from baseline at week 24 was −1.99 (95% confidence interval −2.57 to −1.41) in the tamsulosin and dutasteride group, and −3.12 (95% confidence interval −3.72 to −2.52) in the tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin group. The tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin group significantly improved total overactive bladder symptom score at week 24 as compared with the tamsulosin and dutasteride group; the mean difference was −1.18 (−2.02 to −0.34). The between-group difference was statistically significant as early as week 4. The total International Prostate Symptom Score, storage subscore, quality of life index, and benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index also significantly improved in the tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin group. Conclusions: Tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin combination therapy improves overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life without causing serious adverse drug reactions in patients with enlarged prostate not responding to tamsulosin. This combination therapy seems to represent a promising therapeutic option in these patients.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy with dutasteride and imidafenacin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and persistent overactive bladder symptoms. Methods: A total of 163 patients presenting an enlarged prostate (volume >30 mL) and persistent overactive bladder symptoms despite at least 8 weeks of tamsulosin were randomized to receive tamsulosin and dutasteride, or tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin at a 1:1 ratio. The primary end-point was the mean change from baseline to week 24 in total overactive bladder symptom score. Results: The mean change in total overactive bladder symptom score from baseline at week 24 was −1.99 (95% confidence interval −2.57 to −1.41) in the tamsulosin and dutasteride group, and −3.12 (95% confidence interval −3.72 to −2.52) in the tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin group. The tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin group significantly improved total overactive bladder symptom score at week 24 as compared with the tamsulosin and dutasteride group; the mean difference was −1.18 (−2.02 to −0.34). The between-group difference was statistically significant as early as week 4. The total International Prostate Symptom Score, storage subscore, quality of life index, and benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index also significantly improved in the tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin group. Conclusions: Tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin combination therapy improves overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life without causing serious adverse drug reactions in patients with enlarged prostate not responding to tamsulosin. This combination therapy seems to represent a promising therapeutic option in these patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018974096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018974096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iju.13359
DO - 10.1111/iju.13359
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018974096
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 24
SP - 525
EP - 531
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 7
ER -