Efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images

Tsukasa Kojima, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Hiroshi Narita, Seiji Kumazawa, Yuzo Yamasaki, Yuki Yano, Noriyuki Sakai, Yoichi Kurihara, Kiyoshi Hisada, Masafumi Masaki, Hiroshi Kimura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images. Methods: 15 healthy volunteers underwent imaging with 4 sequences [fast spin echo T2 weighted imaging (FSET2WI), RADAR T2 weighted imaging (RADAR-T2WI), single-shot echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI-DWI) and RADAR diffusion-weighted imaging (RADAR-DWI)]. Both standard images and images during periodic mouth motion were acquired. Two radiologists scored the overall image artefacts and detectability of several anatomical structures without knowledge of sequence type. For each sequence, image distortion was quantitatively compared by the anteroposterior to right-left ratio of several anatomical structures. The mean scores of artefacts and distortion of several anatomical structures were compared using the multiple comparison test. The detectabilities were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Regardless of mouth motion, RADAR-T2WI was significantly superior to FSE-T2WI in artefacts and oralarea detectability (p,0.01), and RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI in terms of artefacts (p,0.01). In terms of image distortion, RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI (p,0.01). Conclusion: RADAR-T2WI could replace FSE-T2WI as a conventional T2WI protocol for the head and neck. For the RADAR-DWI sequence, validation studies are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20160007
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume89
Issue number1067
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Echo-Planar Imaging
Artifacts
Neck
Head
Mouth
Validation Studies
Nonparametric Statistics
Healthy Volunteers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images. / Kojima, Tsukasa; Yabuuchi, Hidetake; Narita, Hiroshi; Kumazawa, Seiji; Yamasaki, Yuzo; Yano, Yuki; Sakai, Noriyuki; Kurihara, Yoichi; Hisada, Kiyoshi; Masaki, Masafumi; Kimura, Hiroshi.

In: British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 89, No. 1067, 20160007, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kojima, T, Yabuuchi, H, Narita, H, Kumazawa, S, Yamasaki, Y, Yano, Y, Sakai, N, Kurihara, Y, Hisada, K, Masaki, M & Kimura, H 2016, 'Efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images', British Journal of Radiology, vol. 89, no. 1067, 20160007. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160007
Kojima, Tsukasa ; Yabuuchi, Hidetake ; Narita, Hiroshi ; Kumazawa, Seiji ; Yamasaki, Yuzo ; Yano, Yuki ; Sakai, Noriyuki ; Kurihara, Yoichi ; Hisada, Kiyoshi ; Masaki, Masafumi ; Kimura, Hiroshi. / Efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images. In: British Journal of Radiology. 2016 ; Vol. 89, No. 1067.
@article{8787cca0bdff4838be3bc50878b07ea8,
title = "Efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images. Methods: 15 healthy volunteers underwent imaging with 4 sequences [fast spin echo T2 weighted imaging (FSET2WI), RADAR T2 weighted imaging (RADAR-T2WI), single-shot echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI-DWI) and RADAR diffusion-weighted imaging (RADAR-DWI)]. Both standard images and images during periodic mouth motion were acquired. Two radiologists scored the overall image artefacts and detectability of several anatomical structures without knowledge of sequence type. For each sequence, image distortion was quantitatively compared by the anteroposterior to right-left ratio of several anatomical structures. The mean scores of artefacts and distortion of several anatomical structures were compared using the multiple comparison test. The detectabilities were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Regardless of mouth motion, RADAR-T2WI was significantly superior to FSE-T2WI in artefacts and oralarea detectability (p,0.01), and RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI in terms of artefacts (p,0.01). In terms of image distortion, RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI (p,0.01). Conclusion: RADAR-T2WI could replace FSE-T2WI as a conventional T2WI protocol for the head and neck. For the RADAR-DWI sequence, validation studies are needed.",
author = "Tsukasa Kojima and Hidetake Yabuuchi and Hiroshi Narita and Seiji Kumazawa and Yuzo Yamasaki and Yuki Yano and Noriyuki Sakai and Yoichi Kurihara and Kiyoshi Hisada and Masafumi Masaki and Hiroshi Kimura",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1259/bjr.20160007",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
journal = "British Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0007-1285",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "1067",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images

AU - Kojima, Tsukasa

AU - Yabuuchi, Hidetake

AU - Narita, Hiroshi

AU - Kumazawa, Seiji

AU - Yamasaki, Yuzo

AU - Yano, Yuki

AU - Sakai, Noriyuki

AU - Kurihara, Yoichi

AU - Hisada, Kiyoshi

AU - Masaki, Masafumi

AU - Kimura, Hiroshi

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images. Methods: 15 healthy volunteers underwent imaging with 4 sequences [fast spin echo T2 weighted imaging (FSET2WI), RADAR T2 weighted imaging (RADAR-T2WI), single-shot echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI-DWI) and RADAR diffusion-weighted imaging (RADAR-DWI)]. Both standard images and images during periodic mouth motion were acquired. Two radiologists scored the overall image artefacts and detectability of several anatomical structures without knowledge of sequence type. For each sequence, image distortion was quantitatively compared by the anteroposterior to right-left ratio of several anatomical structures. The mean scores of artefacts and distortion of several anatomical structures were compared using the multiple comparison test. The detectabilities were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Regardless of mouth motion, RADAR-T2WI was significantly superior to FSE-T2WI in artefacts and oralarea detectability (p,0.01), and RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI in terms of artefacts (p,0.01). In terms of image distortion, RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI (p,0.01). Conclusion: RADAR-T2WI could replace FSE-T2WI as a conventional T2WI protocol for the head and neck. For the RADAR-DWI sequence, validation studies are needed.

AB - Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the radial acquisition regime (RADAR) for acquiring head and neck MR images. Methods: 15 healthy volunteers underwent imaging with 4 sequences [fast spin echo T2 weighted imaging (FSET2WI), RADAR T2 weighted imaging (RADAR-T2WI), single-shot echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI-DWI) and RADAR diffusion-weighted imaging (RADAR-DWI)]. Both standard images and images during periodic mouth motion were acquired. Two radiologists scored the overall image artefacts and detectability of several anatomical structures without knowledge of sequence type. For each sequence, image distortion was quantitatively compared by the anteroposterior to right-left ratio of several anatomical structures. The mean scores of artefacts and distortion of several anatomical structures were compared using the multiple comparison test. The detectabilities were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Regardless of mouth motion, RADAR-T2WI was significantly superior to FSE-T2WI in artefacts and oralarea detectability (p,0.01), and RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI in terms of artefacts (p,0.01). In terms of image distortion, RADAR-DWI was significantly superior to SS-EPI-DWI (p,0.01). Conclusion: RADAR-T2WI could replace FSE-T2WI as a conventional T2WI protocol for the head and neck. For the RADAR-DWI sequence, validation studies are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994156632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994156632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20160007

DO - 10.1259/bjr.20160007

M3 - Article

C2 - 27635791

AN - SCOPUS:84994156632

VL - 89

JO - British Journal of Radiology

JF - British Journal of Radiology

SN - 0007-1285

IS - 1067

M1 - 20160007

ER -