TY - JOUR
T1 - Elasticity boundary conditions required for cell mechanotaxis on microelastically-patterned gels
AU - Kawano, Takahito
AU - Kidoaki, Satoru
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported the following grants: Grants-in-aid for the PRESTO program “Nanosystems and Emergent Functions” from the Japan Science Technology (JST) Agency to S. K, the Scientific Research on Priority Area “System Cell Engineering”, the Global COE program “Science for Future Molecular Systems”, and the Management Expenses Grants for National Universities Corporations “Nano-Macro Materials, Devices and System Research Alliancefrom” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. The authors sincerely thank Prof. Takehisa Matsuda of Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Japan, for his assistance with the synthesis of styrenated gelatins.
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - Directional cell migration induced by a mechanical gradient on a substrate surface toward a harder region, so-called mechanotaxis or durotaxis, has recently drawn attention not only in the field of mechanobiology but also for possible cell manipulation in biomedical engineering. Before we can use mechanotaxis to control cell migration on a biomaterial surface, quantitative design criteria for a microelasticity gradient should be established. To clarify the conditions required to induce mechanotaxis, the effects of a microelasticity boundary on cell culture hydrogels have been systematically assessed with regard to fibroblast migration based on a custom-built reduction projection-type photolithographic microelasticity patterning system with elasticity-tunable photocurable styrenated gelatins, which is a thoroughly-improved system of our previous simple photomasking method [41]. As a result, the conditions required to induce mechanotaxis were found to include a certain threshold jump in elasticity (30-40 kPa) and a sufficiently narrow width of the elasticity boundary (50 μm) comparable to a single cell's adhered area, i.e., a sufficiently high gradient strength (30-40 kPa/50 μm in our gelatinous gel system). A significant asymmetric distribution of the number and size of focal adhesions across the elasticity boundary was confirmed to be one of the driving factors of mechanotaxis by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and mechanistic considerations in the design criteria are discussed.
AB - Directional cell migration induced by a mechanical gradient on a substrate surface toward a harder region, so-called mechanotaxis or durotaxis, has recently drawn attention not only in the field of mechanobiology but also for possible cell manipulation in biomedical engineering. Before we can use mechanotaxis to control cell migration on a biomaterial surface, quantitative design criteria for a microelasticity gradient should be established. To clarify the conditions required to induce mechanotaxis, the effects of a microelasticity boundary on cell culture hydrogels have been systematically assessed with regard to fibroblast migration based on a custom-built reduction projection-type photolithographic microelasticity patterning system with elasticity-tunable photocurable styrenated gelatins, which is a thoroughly-improved system of our previous simple photomasking method [41]. As a result, the conditions required to induce mechanotaxis were found to include a certain threshold jump in elasticity (30-40 kPa) and a sufficiently narrow width of the elasticity boundary (50 μm) comparable to a single cell's adhered area, i.e., a sufficiently high gradient strength (30-40 kPa/50 μm in our gelatinous gel system). A significant asymmetric distribution of the number and size of focal adhesions across the elasticity boundary was confirmed to be one of the driving factors of mechanotaxis by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and mechanistic considerations in the design criteria are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951577944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951577944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 21276611
AN - SCOPUS:79951577944
SN - 0142-9612
VL - 32
SP - 2725
EP - 2733
JO - Biomaterials
JF - Biomaterials
IS - 11
ER -