Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes: Case study

Mark C.M. Van Loosdrecht, Takahiro Kuba, Henry M. Van Veldhuizen, Frank A. Brandse, Joseph J. Heijnen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of primary clarification of sewage on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a modified University of Cape Town (UCT) type wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP) has been studied on a full scale. Before or after the introduction of raw sewage, the sludge was characterized on (denitrifying) phosphorusremoving activities by batch tests. For both situations, mass and energy balances in the WWTP were made in order to evaluate the effect of presettling on the environmental impact of the treatment process. Extra chemical oxygen demand (COD) input due to the introduction of raw sewage improved the overall nitrogen removal, whereas P-removal remained good. However, the improvement of nitrogen removal resulted mainly from increased assimilation into extra sludge production, not from increased denitrification. In fact, results of the batch tests indicated that the denitrification activity after the introduction of raw sewage was almost similar to the sludge with presettled sewage. The introduction of raw sewage resulted in an increase of energy consumption, mainly due to lower methane production in the digester. This research shows that evaluating treatment processes solely on effluent quality can easily lead to overall adverse effects for the environment. The full environmental impact should also be considered for treatment processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-40
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering
Volume123
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Sewage
Nutrients
Environmental impact
environmental impact
sewage
Nitrogen removal
Denitrification
sludge
Sewage sludge
Wastewater treatment
denitrification
nitrogen
Chemical oxygen demand
Methane
Energy balance
chemical oxygen demand
Phosphorus
energy balance
nutrient removal
Effluents

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Kuba, T., Van Veldhuizen, H. M., Brandse, F. A., & Heijnen, J. J. (1997). Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes: Case study. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123(1), 33-40.

Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes : Case study. / Van Loosdrecht, Mark C.M.; Kuba, Takahiro; Van Veldhuizen, Henry M.; Brandse, Frank A.; Heijnen, Joseph J.

In: Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 33-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Loosdrecht, MCM, Kuba, T, Van Veldhuizen, HM, Brandse, FA & Heijnen, JJ 1997, 'Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes: Case study', Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 33-40.
Van Loosdrecht MCM, Kuba T, Van Veldhuizen HM, Brandse FA, Heijnen JJ. Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes: Case study. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 1997 Jan 1;123(1):33-40.
Van Loosdrecht, Mark C.M. ; Kuba, Takahiro ; Van Veldhuizen, Henry M. ; Brandse, Frank A. ; Heijnen, Joseph J. / Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes : Case study. In: Journal of Environmental Engineering. 1997 ; Vol. 123, No. 1. pp. 33-40.
@article{21bc3f5beb8f409691dd8249482ab41b,
title = "Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes: Case study",
abstract = "The influence of primary clarification of sewage on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a modified University of Cape Town (UCT) type wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP) has been studied on a full scale. Before or after the introduction of raw sewage, the sludge was characterized on (denitrifying) phosphorusremoving activities by batch tests. For both situations, mass and energy balances in the WWTP were made in order to evaluate the effect of presettling on the environmental impact of the treatment process. Extra chemical oxygen demand (COD) input due to the introduction of raw sewage improved the overall nitrogen removal, whereas P-removal remained good. However, the improvement of nitrogen removal resulted mainly from increased assimilation into extra sludge production, not from increased denitrification. In fact, results of the batch tests indicated that the denitrification activity after the introduction of raw sewage was almost similar to the sludge with presettled sewage. The introduction of raw sewage resulted in an increase of energy consumption, mainly due to lower methane production in the digester. This research shows that evaluating treatment processes solely on effluent quality can easily lead to overall adverse effects for the environment. The full environmental impact should also be considered for treatment processes.",
author = "{Van Loosdrecht}, {Mark C.M.} and Takahiro Kuba and {Van Veldhuizen}, {Henry M.} and Brandse, {Frank A.} and Heijnen, {Joseph J.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "123",
pages = "33--40",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)",
issn = "1348-0685",
publisher = "Architectural Institute of Japan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental impacts of nutrient removal processes

T2 - Case study

AU - Van Loosdrecht, Mark C.M.

AU - Kuba, Takahiro

AU - Van Veldhuizen, Henry M.

AU - Brandse, Frank A.

AU - Heijnen, Joseph J.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - The influence of primary clarification of sewage on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a modified University of Cape Town (UCT) type wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP) has been studied on a full scale. Before or after the introduction of raw sewage, the sludge was characterized on (denitrifying) phosphorusremoving activities by batch tests. For both situations, mass and energy balances in the WWTP were made in order to evaluate the effect of presettling on the environmental impact of the treatment process. Extra chemical oxygen demand (COD) input due to the introduction of raw sewage improved the overall nitrogen removal, whereas P-removal remained good. However, the improvement of nitrogen removal resulted mainly from increased assimilation into extra sludge production, not from increased denitrification. In fact, results of the batch tests indicated that the denitrification activity after the introduction of raw sewage was almost similar to the sludge with presettled sewage. The introduction of raw sewage resulted in an increase of energy consumption, mainly due to lower methane production in the digester. This research shows that evaluating treatment processes solely on effluent quality can easily lead to overall adverse effects for the environment. The full environmental impact should also be considered for treatment processes.

AB - The influence of primary clarification of sewage on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a modified University of Cape Town (UCT) type wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP) has been studied on a full scale. Before or after the introduction of raw sewage, the sludge was characterized on (denitrifying) phosphorusremoving activities by batch tests. For both situations, mass and energy balances in the WWTP were made in order to evaluate the effect of presettling on the environmental impact of the treatment process. Extra chemical oxygen demand (COD) input due to the introduction of raw sewage improved the overall nitrogen removal, whereas P-removal remained good. However, the improvement of nitrogen removal resulted mainly from increased assimilation into extra sludge production, not from increased denitrification. In fact, results of the batch tests indicated that the denitrification activity after the introduction of raw sewage was almost similar to the sludge with presettled sewage. The introduction of raw sewage resulted in an increase of energy consumption, mainly due to lower methane production in the digester. This research shows that evaluating treatment processes solely on effluent quality can easily lead to overall adverse effects for the environment. The full environmental impact should also be considered for treatment processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001867257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001867257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001867257

VL - 123

SP - 33

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)

JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)

SN - 1348-0685

IS - 1

ER -