Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper brings a fresh, epistemic perspective to bear on prominent Confucian philosophers’ arguments for (1) a hybrid Deweyan-Confucian democracy, or (2) for an illiberal democracy with “Confucian characteristics.” Reconstructing principles for epistemic elitism and paternalism from the pre-Qin 秦 Confucian thought that inspires these advocates for Confucian democracy, it finds two major problems with their proposals. For those who abandon or modify this epistemic elitism and paternalism in accordance with (1), the result is a philosophical syncretism that is either unconvincingly Confucian or unconvincingly Deweyan. For those who retain it in accordance with (2), the result is a democratic proposal that will lack legitimacy in increasingly pluralistic East Asian societies. In the end, there is a need for thinking that appropriately synthesizes Eastern and Western philosophies in a politically changing East Asia, but it would benefit from being less “Confucian.”

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-54
Number of pages22
JournalDao
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Elitism
Democracy
Paternalism
Confucian
Thought
Philosopher
East Asia
Legitimacy
Eastern philosophy
Asia
Syncretism
Western philosophy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy. / Odwyer, Shaun Richard.

In: Dao, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 33-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bf405248f5f40dd9a4bb561495239d6,
title = "Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy",
abstract = "This paper brings a fresh, epistemic perspective to bear on prominent Confucian philosophers’ arguments for (1) a hybrid Deweyan-Confucian democracy, or (2) for an illiberal democracy with “Confucian characteristics.” Reconstructing principles for epistemic elitism and paternalism from the pre-Qin 秦 Confucian thought that inspires these advocates for Confucian democracy, it finds two major problems with their proposals. For those who abandon or modify this epistemic elitism and paternalism in accordance with (1), the result is a philosophical syncretism that is either unconvincingly Confucian or unconvincingly Deweyan. For those who retain it in accordance with (2), the result is a democratic proposal that will lack legitimacy in increasingly pluralistic East Asian societies. In the end, there is a need for thinking that appropriately synthesizes Eastern and Western philosophies in a politically changing East Asia, but it would benefit from being less “Confucian.”",
author = "Odwyer, {Shaun Richard}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11712-014-9415-9",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "33--54",
journal = "Dao",
issn = "1540-3009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy

AU - Odwyer, Shaun Richard

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper brings a fresh, epistemic perspective to bear on prominent Confucian philosophers’ arguments for (1) a hybrid Deweyan-Confucian democracy, or (2) for an illiberal democracy with “Confucian characteristics.” Reconstructing principles for epistemic elitism and paternalism from the pre-Qin 秦 Confucian thought that inspires these advocates for Confucian democracy, it finds two major problems with their proposals. For those who abandon or modify this epistemic elitism and paternalism in accordance with (1), the result is a philosophical syncretism that is either unconvincingly Confucian or unconvincingly Deweyan. For those who retain it in accordance with (2), the result is a democratic proposal that will lack legitimacy in increasingly pluralistic East Asian societies. In the end, there is a need for thinking that appropriately synthesizes Eastern and Western philosophies in a politically changing East Asia, but it would benefit from being less “Confucian.”

AB - This paper brings a fresh, epistemic perspective to bear on prominent Confucian philosophers’ arguments for (1) a hybrid Deweyan-Confucian democracy, or (2) for an illiberal democracy with “Confucian characteristics.” Reconstructing principles for epistemic elitism and paternalism from the pre-Qin 秦 Confucian thought that inspires these advocates for Confucian democracy, it finds two major problems with their proposals. For those who abandon or modify this epistemic elitism and paternalism in accordance with (1), the result is a philosophical syncretism that is either unconvincingly Confucian or unconvincingly Deweyan. For those who retain it in accordance with (2), the result is a democratic proposal that will lack legitimacy in increasingly pluralistic East Asian societies. In the end, there is a need for thinking that appropriately synthesizes Eastern and Western philosophies in a politically changing East Asia, but it would benefit from being less “Confucian.”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925482577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925482577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11712-014-9415-9

DO - 10.1007/s11712-014-9415-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925482577

VL - 14

SP - 33

EP - 54

JO - Dao

JF - Dao

SN - 1540-3009

IS - 1

ER -