TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating aboveground carbon using airborne LiDAR in Cambodian tropical seasonal forests for REDD+ implementation
AU - Ota, Tetsuji
AU - Kajisa, Tsuyoshi
AU - Mizoue, Nobuya
AU - Yoshida, Shigejiro
AU - Takao, Gen
AU - Hirata, Yasumasa
AU - Furuya, Naoyuki
AU - Sano, Takio
AU - Ponce-Hernandez, Raul
AU - Ahmed, Oumer S.
AU - Sokh, Heng
AU - Ma, Vuthy
AU - Ito, Eriko
AU - Toriyama, Jumpei
AU - Monda, Yukako
AU - Saito, Hideki
AU - Kiyono, Yoshiyuki
AU - Chann, Sophal
AU - Ket, Nang
PY - 2015/8/19
Y1 - 2015/8/19
N2 - We developed an empirical model to estimate aboveground carbon density with variables derived from airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) in tropical seasonal forests in Cambodia, and assessed the effects of LiDAR pulse density on the accurate estimation of aboveground carbon density. First, we tested the applicability of variables used for estimating aboveground carbon density with the original LiDAR pulse density data (26 pulse m−2). Aboveground carbon density was regressed against variables derived from airborne LiDAR. Three individual height variable models were developed along with a canopy density model, and three other models combined canopy height and canopy density variables. The influence of forest type on model accuracy was also assessed. Next, the relationship between pulse density and estimation accuracy was investigated using the best regression model. The accuracy of the models were compared based on seven LiDAR point densities consisting of 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 pulse m−2. The best model was obtained using the single mean canopy height (MCH) model (R2 = 0.92) with the original pulse density data. The relationship between MCH and aboveground carbon density was found to be consistent under different forest types. The differences between predicted and measured residual mean of squares of deviations were less than 1.5 Mg C ha−1 between each pulse density. We concluded that aboveground carbon density can be estimated using MCH derived from airborne LiDAR in tropical seasonal forests in Cambodia even with a low pulse density of 0.25 pulse m−2 without stratifying the study area based on forest type.
AB - We developed an empirical model to estimate aboveground carbon density with variables derived from airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) in tropical seasonal forests in Cambodia, and assessed the effects of LiDAR pulse density on the accurate estimation of aboveground carbon density. First, we tested the applicability of variables used for estimating aboveground carbon density with the original LiDAR pulse density data (26 pulse m−2). Aboveground carbon density was regressed against variables derived from airborne LiDAR. Three individual height variable models were developed along with a canopy density model, and three other models combined canopy height and canopy density variables. The influence of forest type on model accuracy was also assessed. Next, the relationship between pulse density and estimation accuracy was investigated using the best regression model. The accuracy of the models were compared based on seven LiDAR point densities consisting of 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 pulse m−2. The best model was obtained using the single mean canopy height (MCH) model (R2 = 0.92) with the original pulse density data. The relationship between MCH and aboveground carbon density was found to be consistent under different forest types. The differences between predicted and measured residual mean of squares of deviations were less than 1.5 Mg C ha−1 between each pulse density. We concluded that aboveground carbon density can be estimated using MCH derived from airborne LiDAR in tropical seasonal forests in Cambodia even with a low pulse density of 0.25 pulse m−2 without stratifying the study area based on forest type.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947037497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947037497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10310-015-0504-3
DO - 10.1007/s10310-015-0504-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84947037497
SN - 1341-6979
VL - 20
SP - 484
EP - 492
JO - Journal of Forest Research
JF - Journal of Forest Research
IS - 6
ER -