Etiology and revision surgical strategiesin failed lumbosacral fixation of adultspinal deformity constructs

Katsumi Harimaya, Takuya Mishiro, Lawrence G. Lenke, Keith H. Bridwell, Linda A. Koester, Brenda A. Sides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective case analysis. OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the etiology and salvage strategies of failed lumbosacral fixation in adult spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: When extending a long spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum, the lumbosacral junction is a common site for implant problems and pseudarthrosis. METHODS.: Clinical and radiographic results of 33 patients (26 women/seven men; average age, 53.5 years; range, 21-73) diagnosed and treated for lumbosacral fixation failure between 1995 and 2007 were reviewed. Twenty-one of the 33 patients underwent revision surgery at one institution for these failures and were followed postoperatively for more than 2 years (average, 50.7 months). RESULTS.: Twenty-nine of these 33 patients had two sacral screws, two patients one sacral screw, and two patients none. Bicortical sacral screws were placed in 18 patients, only 12 had distal fixation to the sacral screws (bilateral iliac screws, n = 9; others, n = 3). Seventeen of 19 patients without distal fixation to the sacral screws had screw loosening/pullout at L5 or S1. Anteriorly at L5-S1: 4/6 bone grafts collapsed, 5 of 15 intervertebral discs without anterior column support collapsed, and two of 12 titanium cages subsided into the endplates. Rod breakage between L5 and S1 (n = 9) was seen only in patients with distal fixation to the sacral screws. Nineteen of 21 revision patients received two bicortical sacral screws, whereas 20 received distal fixation to the sacral screws consisting of bilateral iliac screws in 16. Nineteen patients received anterior column support at L5-S1. Fifteen of 21 revision patients achieved solid fusion at ultimate follow-up; however, six had additional rod breakage or dislodgement at the lumbosacral junction. CONCLUSION.: With long fusions to the sacrum in the treatment of spinal deformity, the use of bilateral S1 screws alone may allow for screw loosening/pullout and/or L5-S1 cage/graft collapse/subsidence. Adding bilateral iliac screws and an anterior structural cage/graft at L5-S1 will protect the S1 screws, but may still allow L5-S1 rod breakage/dislodgement because of lumbosacral pseudarthrosis. Revision surgery in these patients remains a challenge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1701-1710
Number of pages10
JournalSpine
Volume36
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 15 2011

Fingerprint

Reoperation
Sacrum
Pseudarthrosis
Transplants
Spinal Fusion
Intervertebral Disc
Titanium
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Etiology and revision surgical strategiesin failed lumbosacral fixation of adultspinal deformity constructs. / Harimaya, Katsumi; Mishiro, Takuya; Lenke, Lawrence G.; Bridwell, Keith H.; Koester, Linda A.; Sides, Brenda A.

In: Spine, Vol. 36, No. 20, 15.09.2011, p. 1701-1710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harimaya, Katsumi ; Mishiro, Takuya ; Lenke, Lawrence G. ; Bridwell, Keith H. ; Koester, Linda A. ; Sides, Brenda A. / Etiology and revision surgical strategiesin failed lumbosacral fixation of adultspinal deformity constructs. In: Spine. 2011 ; Vol. 36, No. 20. pp. 1701-1710.
@article{164fc0f651a74318a873e084b57abbfe,
title = "Etiology and revision surgical strategiesin failed lumbosacral fixation of adultspinal deformity constructs",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective case analysis. OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the etiology and salvage strategies of failed lumbosacral fixation in adult spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: When extending a long spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum, the lumbosacral junction is a common site for implant problems and pseudarthrosis. METHODS.: Clinical and radiographic results of 33 patients (26 women/seven men; average age, 53.5 years; range, 21-73) diagnosed and treated for lumbosacral fixation failure between 1995 and 2007 were reviewed. Twenty-one of the 33 patients underwent revision surgery at one institution for these failures and were followed postoperatively for more than 2 years (average, 50.7 months). RESULTS.: Twenty-nine of these 33 patients had two sacral screws, two patients one sacral screw, and two patients none. Bicortical sacral screws were placed in 18 patients, only 12 had distal fixation to the sacral screws (bilateral iliac screws, n = 9; others, n = 3). Seventeen of 19 patients without distal fixation to the sacral screws had screw loosening/pullout at L5 or S1. Anteriorly at L5-S1: 4/6 bone grafts collapsed, 5 of 15 intervertebral discs without anterior column support collapsed, and two of 12 titanium cages subsided into the endplates. Rod breakage between L5 and S1 (n = 9) was seen only in patients with distal fixation to the sacral screws. Nineteen of 21 revision patients received two bicortical sacral screws, whereas 20 received distal fixation to the sacral screws consisting of bilateral iliac screws in 16. Nineteen patients received anterior column support at L5-S1. Fifteen of 21 revision patients achieved solid fusion at ultimate follow-up; however, six had additional rod breakage or dislodgement at the lumbosacral junction. CONCLUSION.: With long fusions to the sacrum in the treatment of spinal deformity, the use of bilateral S1 screws alone may allow for screw loosening/pullout and/or L5-S1 cage/graft collapse/subsidence. Adding bilateral iliac screws and an anterior structural cage/graft at L5-S1 will protect the S1 screws, but may still allow L5-S1 rod breakage/dislodgement because of lumbosacral pseudarthrosis. Revision surgery in these patients remains a challenge.",
author = "Katsumi Harimaya and Takuya Mishiro and Lenke, {Lawrence G.} and Bridwell, {Keith H.} and Koester, {Linda A.} and Sides, {Brenda A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257eaf",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1701--1710",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Etiology and revision surgical strategiesin failed lumbosacral fixation of adultspinal deformity constructs

AU - Harimaya, Katsumi

AU - Mishiro, Takuya

AU - Lenke, Lawrence G.

AU - Bridwell, Keith H.

AU - Koester, Linda A.

AU - Sides, Brenda A.

PY - 2011/9/15

Y1 - 2011/9/15

N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective case analysis. OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the etiology and salvage strategies of failed lumbosacral fixation in adult spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: When extending a long spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum, the lumbosacral junction is a common site for implant problems and pseudarthrosis. METHODS.: Clinical and radiographic results of 33 patients (26 women/seven men; average age, 53.5 years; range, 21-73) diagnosed and treated for lumbosacral fixation failure between 1995 and 2007 were reviewed. Twenty-one of the 33 patients underwent revision surgery at one institution for these failures and were followed postoperatively for more than 2 years (average, 50.7 months). RESULTS.: Twenty-nine of these 33 patients had two sacral screws, two patients one sacral screw, and two patients none. Bicortical sacral screws were placed in 18 patients, only 12 had distal fixation to the sacral screws (bilateral iliac screws, n = 9; others, n = 3). Seventeen of 19 patients without distal fixation to the sacral screws had screw loosening/pullout at L5 or S1. Anteriorly at L5-S1: 4/6 bone grafts collapsed, 5 of 15 intervertebral discs without anterior column support collapsed, and two of 12 titanium cages subsided into the endplates. Rod breakage between L5 and S1 (n = 9) was seen only in patients with distal fixation to the sacral screws. Nineteen of 21 revision patients received two bicortical sacral screws, whereas 20 received distal fixation to the sacral screws consisting of bilateral iliac screws in 16. Nineteen patients received anterior column support at L5-S1. Fifteen of 21 revision patients achieved solid fusion at ultimate follow-up; however, six had additional rod breakage or dislodgement at the lumbosacral junction. CONCLUSION.: With long fusions to the sacrum in the treatment of spinal deformity, the use of bilateral S1 screws alone may allow for screw loosening/pullout and/or L5-S1 cage/graft collapse/subsidence. Adding bilateral iliac screws and an anterior structural cage/graft at L5-S1 will protect the S1 screws, but may still allow L5-S1 rod breakage/dislodgement because of lumbosacral pseudarthrosis. Revision surgery in these patients remains a challenge.

AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective case analysis. OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the etiology and salvage strategies of failed lumbosacral fixation in adult spinal deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: When extending a long spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum, the lumbosacral junction is a common site for implant problems and pseudarthrosis. METHODS.: Clinical and radiographic results of 33 patients (26 women/seven men; average age, 53.5 years; range, 21-73) diagnosed and treated for lumbosacral fixation failure between 1995 and 2007 were reviewed. Twenty-one of the 33 patients underwent revision surgery at one institution for these failures and were followed postoperatively for more than 2 years (average, 50.7 months). RESULTS.: Twenty-nine of these 33 patients had two sacral screws, two patients one sacral screw, and two patients none. Bicortical sacral screws were placed in 18 patients, only 12 had distal fixation to the sacral screws (bilateral iliac screws, n = 9; others, n = 3). Seventeen of 19 patients without distal fixation to the sacral screws had screw loosening/pullout at L5 or S1. Anteriorly at L5-S1: 4/6 bone grafts collapsed, 5 of 15 intervertebral discs without anterior column support collapsed, and two of 12 titanium cages subsided into the endplates. Rod breakage between L5 and S1 (n = 9) was seen only in patients with distal fixation to the sacral screws. Nineteen of 21 revision patients received two bicortical sacral screws, whereas 20 received distal fixation to the sacral screws consisting of bilateral iliac screws in 16. Nineteen patients received anterior column support at L5-S1. Fifteen of 21 revision patients achieved solid fusion at ultimate follow-up; however, six had additional rod breakage or dislodgement at the lumbosacral junction. CONCLUSION.: With long fusions to the sacrum in the treatment of spinal deformity, the use of bilateral S1 screws alone may allow for screw loosening/pullout and/or L5-S1 cage/graft collapse/subsidence. Adding bilateral iliac screws and an anterior structural cage/graft at L5-S1 will protect the S1 screws, but may still allow L5-S1 rod breakage/dislodgement because of lumbosacral pseudarthrosis. Revision surgery in these patients remains a challenge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052655268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052655268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257eaf

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257eaf

M3 - Article

C2 - 21673615

AN - SCOPUS:80052655268

VL - 36

SP - 1701

EP - 1710

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 20

ER -