Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO

Tempei Hashino, Masaki Satoh, Yuichiro Hagihara, Takuji Kubota, Toshihisa Matsui, Tomoe Nasuno, Hajime Okamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe a method to evaluate cloud microphysics simulated with a global cloud-resolving model against CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite data. Output from the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) is run through a satellite-sensor simulator (Joint Simulator for Satellite Sensors), then directly compared to the radar and lidar signals from CloudSat and CALIPSO. The forward approach allows for consistency in cloud microphysical assumption involved in the evaluation. To investigate the dependence of the signals on the temperature, we use temperature extensively as the vertical coordinate. The global statistical analysis of the radar reflectivity shows that the simulation overestimates all the percentiles above -50°C and that snow category contributes significantly to low reflectivity values between -80 and -40°C. The simulated lidar signals have two modes associated with cloud ice and snow categories, though the observations have only one mode. The synergetic use of radar reflectivity and lidar backscatter enables us to determine the relative magnitudes of ice/liquid water contents and effective radii without use of retrievals. The radar-and-lidar diagnosis for cloud tops shows that, due to snow category, NICAM overestimates the mass-equivalent effective radius and underestimates ice water content. Also, the diagnosis was shown to be useful to investigate sensitivities of the parameters of bulk microphysical schemes on the water contents and sizes. The nonspherical scattering of ice particles was shown to affect the above radar-and-lidar diagnosis for large reflectivity ranges but not to alter most of the other diagnoses for this simulation. Key Points The cloud radar and lidar enable us to evaluate simulated clouds effectively

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7273-7292
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Volume118
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 16 2013

Fingerprint

CloudSat
CALIPSO
cloud microphysics
lidar
atmospheric models
satellite observation
Optical radar
aerosols
Aerosols
optical radar
radar
Satellites
Infrared radiation
reflectivity
Radar
Ice
ice
snow
Snow
satellite sensor

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO. / Hashino, Tempei; Satoh, Masaki; Hagihara, Yuichiro; Kubota, Takuji; Matsui, Toshihisa; Nasuno, Tomoe; Okamoto, Hajime.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 118, No. 13, 16.07.2013, p. 7273-7292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hashino, T, Satoh, M, Hagihara, Y, Kubota, T, Matsui, T, Nasuno, T & Okamoto, H 2013, 'Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO', Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 118, no. 13, pp. 7273-7292. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50564
Hashino T, Satoh M, Hagihara Y, Kubota T, Matsui T, Nasuno T et al. Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2013 Jul 16;118(13):7273-7292. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50564
Hashino, Tempei ; Satoh, Masaki ; Hagihara, Yuichiro ; Kubota, Takuji ; Matsui, Toshihisa ; Nasuno, Tomoe ; Okamoto, Hajime. / Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO. In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2013 ; Vol. 118, No. 13. pp. 7273-7292.
@article{1e0413004cc643fa9a5951da94d3f537,
title = "Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO",
abstract = "We describe a method to evaluate cloud microphysics simulated with a global cloud-resolving model against CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite data. Output from the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) is run through a satellite-sensor simulator (Joint Simulator for Satellite Sensors), then directly compared to the radar and lidar signals from CloudSat and CALIPSO. The forward approach allows for consistency in cloud microphysical assumption involved in the evaluation. To investigate the dependence of the signals on the temperature, we use temperature extensively as the vertical coordinate. The global statistical analysis of the radar reflectivity shows that the simulation overestimates all the percentiles above -50°C and that snow category contributes significantly to low reflectivity values between -80 and -40°C. The simulated lidar signals have two modes associated with cloud ice and snow categories, though the observations have only one mode. The synergetic use of radar reflectivity and lidar backscatter enables us to determine the relative magnitudes of ice/liquid water contents and effective radii without use of retrievals. The radar-and-lidar diagnosis for cloud tops shows that, due to snow category, NICAM overestimates the mass-equivalent effective radius and underestimates ice water content. Also, the diagnosis was shown to be useful to investigate sensitivities of the parameters of bulk microphysical schemes on the water contents and sizes. The nonspherical scattering of ice particles was shown to affect the above radar-and-lidar diagnosis for large reflectivity ranges but not to alter most of the other diagnoses for this simulation. Key Points The cloud radar and lidar enable us to evaluate simulated clouds effectively",
author = "Tempei Hashino and Masaki Satoh and Yuichiro Hagihara and Takuji Kubota and Toshihisa Matsui and Tomoe Nasuno and Hajime Okamoto",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/jgrd.50564",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "7273--7292",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating cloud microphysics from NICAM against CloudSat and CALIPSO

AU - Hashino, Tempei

AU - Satoh, Masaki

AU - Hagihara, Yuichiro

AU - Kubota, Takuji

AU - Matsui, Toshihisa

AU - Nasuno, Tomoe

AU - Okamoto, Hajime

PY - 2013/7/16

Y1 - 2013/7/16

N2 - We describe a method to evaluate cloud microphysics simulated with a global cloud-resolving model against CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite data. Output from the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) is run through a satellite-sensor simulator (Joint Simulator for Satellite Sensors), then directly compared to the radar and lidar signals from CloudSat and CALIPSO. The forward approach allows for consistency in cloud microphysical assumption involved in the evaluation. To investigate the dependence of the signals on the temperature, we use temperature extensively as the vertical coordinate. The global statistical analysis of the radar reflectivity shows that the simulation overestimates all the percentiles above -50°C and that snow category contributes significantly to low reflectivity values between -80 and -40°C. The simulated lidar signals have two modes associated with cloud ice and snow categories, though the observations have only one mode. The synergetic use of radar reflectivity and lidar backscatter enables us to determine the relative magnitudes of ice/liquid water contents and effective radii without use of retrievals. The radar-and-lidar diagnosis for cloud tops shows that, due to snow category, NICAM overestimates the mass-equivalent effective radius and underestimates ice water content. Also, the diagnosis was shown to be useful to investigate sensitivities of the parameters of bulk microphysical schemes on the water contents and sizes. The nonspherical scattering of ice particles was shown to affect the above radar-and-lidar diagnosis for large reflectivity ranges but not to alter most of the other diagnoses for this simulation. Key Points The cloud radar and lidar enable us to evaluate simulated clouds effectively

AB - We describe a method to evaluate cloud microphysics simulated with a global cloud-resolving model against CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite data. Output from the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) is run through a satellite-sensor simulator (Joint Simulator for Satellite Sensors), then directly compared to the radar and lidar signals from CloudSat and CALIPSO. The forward approach allows for consistency in cloud microphysical assumption involved in the evaluation. To investigate the dependence of the signals on the temperature, we use temperature extensively as the vertical coordinate. The global statistical analysis of the radar reflectivity shows that the simulation overestimates all the percentiles above -50°C and that snow category contributes significantly to low reflectivity values between -80 and -40°C. The simulated lidar signals have two modes associated with cloud ice and snow categories, though the observations have only one mode. The synergetic use of radar reflectivity and lidar backscatter enables us to determine the relative magnitudes of ice/liquid water contents and effective radii without use of retrievals. The radar-and-lidar diagnosis for cloud tops shows that, due to snow category, NICAM overestimates the mass-equivalent effective radius and underestimates ice water content. Also, the diagnosis was shown to be useful to investigate sensitivities of the parameters of bulk microphysical schemes on the water contents and sizes. The nonspherical scattering of ice particles was shown to affect the above radar-and-lidar diagnosis for large reflectivity ranges but not to alter most of the other diagnoses for this simulation. Key Points The cloud radar and lidar enable us to evaluate simulated clouds effectively

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880909634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880909634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jgrd.50564

DO - 10.1002/jgrd.50564

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880909634

VL - 118

SP - 7273

EP - 7292

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 13

ER -