Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography

Junji Morishita, Heber MacMohan, Kunio Doi, Michael Carlin, Yoshiharu Sukenobir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the potential utility of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography, its image quality and detail visibility compared with a conventional screen-film system are investigated. The basic imaging properties were evaluated by measuring Hurter and Driffield curves, resolution properties, and noise Wiener spectra. The visibility of simulated anatomical and pathological details in radiographs of a chest phantom and normal anatomy in chest radiographs of patients were evaluated subjectively. The dynamic range of each system is comparable, though the asymmetric screen-film system can provide an advantage over the conventional system due to a relative dose reduction of approximately 35% and higher resolution properties at high optical densities. The noise level of the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly greater at low optical densities and much greater at high optical densities. However, the visibility of lung details with the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly superior to the conventional screen-film system despite the increase in noise. Mediastinal and retrodiaphragmatic details are similar, though marginally superior with the asymmetric screen-film system. It is concluded that the asymmetric screen-film system provided slightly superior image quality to the conventional screen-film system for chest radiography, provided the average lung density is maintained at a higher level than is customary with conventional systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1769-1775
Number of pages7
JournalMedical physics
Volume21
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiography
Thorax
Noise
Lung
Anatomy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography. / Morishita, Junji; MacMohan, Heber; Doi, Kunio; Carlin, Michael; Sukenobir, Yoshiharu.

In: Medical physics, Vol. 21, No. 11, 01.01.1994, p. 1769-1775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morishita, J, MacMohan, H, Doi, K, Carlin, M & Sukenobir, Y 1994, 'Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography', Medical physics, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1769-1775. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597277
Morishita, Junji ; MacMohan, Heber ; Doi, Kunio ; Carlin, Michael ; Sukenobir, Yoshiharu. / Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography. In: Medical physics. 1994 ; Vol. 21, No. 11. pp. 1769-1775.
@article{52dd3a29e82542958b358e74c96295e6,
title = "Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography",
abstract = "To evaluate the potential utility of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography, its image quality and detail visibility compared with a conventional screen-film system are investigated. The basic imaging properties were evaluated by measuring Hurter and Driffield curves, resolution properties, and noise Wiener spectra. The visibility of simulated anatomical and pathological details in radiographs of a chest phantom and normal anatomy in chest radiographs of patients were evaluated subjectively. The dynamic range of each system is comparable, though the asymmetric screen-film system can provide an advantage over the conventional system due to a relative dose reduction of approximately 35{\%} and higher resolution properties at high optical densities. The noise level of the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly greater at low optical densities and much greater at high optical densities. However, the visibility of lung details with the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly superior to the conventional screen-film system despite the increase in noise. Mediastinal and retrodiaphragmatic details are similar, though marginally superior with the asymmetric screen-film system. It is concluded that the asymmetric screen-film system provided slightly superior image quality to the conventional screen-film system for chest radiography, provided the average lung density is maintained at a higher level than is customary with conventional systems.",
author = "Junji Morishita and Heber MacMohan and Kunio Doi and Michael Carlin and Yoshiharu Sukenobir",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.597277",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1769--1775",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography

AU - Morishita, Junji

AU - MacMohan, Heber

AU - Doi, Kunio

AU - Carlin, Michael

AU - Sukenobir, Yoshiharu

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - To evaluate the potential utility of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography, its image quality and detail visibility compared with a conventional screen-film system are investigated. The basic imaging properties were evaluated by measuring Hurter and Driffield curves, resolution properties, and noise Wiener spectra. The visibility of simulated anatomical and pathological details in radiographs of a chest phantom and normal anatomy in chest radiographs of patients were evaluated subjectively. The dynamic range of each system is comparable, though the asymmetric screen-film system can provide an advantage over the conventional system due to a relative dose reduction of approximately 35% and higher resolution properties at high optical densities. The noise level of the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly greater at low optical densities and much greater at high optical densities. However, the visibility of lung details with the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly superior to the conventional screen-film system despite the increase in noise. Mediastinal and retrodiaphragmatic details are similar, though marginally superior with the asymmetric screen-film system. It is concluded that the asymmetric screen-film system provided slightly superior image quality to the conventional screen-film system for chest radiography, provided the average lung density is maintained at a higher level than is customary with conventional systems.

AB - To evaluate the potential utility of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography, its image quality and detail visibility compared with a conventional screen-film system are investigated. The basic imaging properties were evaluated by measuring Hurter and Driffield curves, resolution properties, and noise Wiener spectra. The visibility of simulated anatomical and pathological details in radiographs of a chest phantom and normal anatomy in chest radiographs of patients were evaluated subjectively. The dynamic range of each system is comparable, though the asymmetric screen-film system can provide an advantage over the conventional system due to a relative dose reduction of approximately 35% and higher resolution properties at high optical densities. The noise level of the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly greater at low optical densities and much greater at high optical densities. However, the visibility of lung details with the asymmetric screen-film system is slightly superior to the conventional screen-film system despite the increase in noise. Mediastinal and retrodiaphragmatic details are similar, though marginally superior with the asymmetric screen-film system. It is concluded that the asymmetric screen-film system provided slightly superior image quality to the conventional screen-film system for chest radiography, provided the average lung density is maintained at a higher level than is customary with conventional systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028080772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028080772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.597277

DO - 10.1118/1.597277

M3 - Article

C2 - 7891639

AN - SCOPUS:0028080772

VL - 21

SP - 1769

EP - 1775

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 11

ER -