Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: A comparison with conventional open gastrectomy

Osamu Ikeda, Yoshihisa Sakaguchi, Yasushi Toh, Kippei Oogaki, Eiji Oki, Kazuhito Minami, Takeshi Okamura, Hideo Baba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with lymphadenectomy has been revealed to be a useful treatment for early gastric cancer but oncological adequacy is controversial. Methodology: To assess the quality of lymphadenectomy, we evaluated the number of dissected lymph nodes and the non-compliance rate (defined as an absence of nodal tissue at a node station that should have been resected) and compared the data obtained from 102 patients treated by LDG with those from 90 patients treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG). Results: The numbers of nodes of Categories 1 and 2, which correspond respectively to perigastric and retroperitoneal nodes, did not differ significantly between the LDG group and the ODG group. In the LDG group compared to the ODG group, there were significantly more right paracardial nodes (No. 1) but there were significantly fewer infrapyloric nodes (No. 6). However, the difference in infrapyloric nodes (No. 6) became insignificant when we re-analyzed and compared the ODG group and the patients (n=42) whose LDGs were performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Conclusions: The curability of gastric cancer on LDG was almost equivalent to that of ODG from the viewpoint of lymph node dissection, if the LDG is performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. These data suggested that LDG with lymphadenectomy could possibly be adopted for advanced gastric cancer treatment under proper quality control, such as that provided by an experienced laparoscopic team.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)627-632
Number of pages6
JournalHepato-gastroenterology
Volume59
Issue number114
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Gastrectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Stomach Neoplasms
Quality Control
Lymph Nodes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection : A comparison with conventional open gastrectomy. / Ikeda, Osamu; Sakaguchi, Yoshihisa; Toh, Yasushi; Oogaki, Kippei; Oki, Eiji; Minami, Kazuhito; Okamura, Takeshi; Baba, Hideo.

In: Hepato-gastroenterology, Vol. 59, No. 114, 01.03.2012, p. 627-632.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ikeda, Osamu ; Sakaguchi, Yoshihisa ; Toh, Yasushi ; Oogaki, Kippei ; Oki, Eiji ; Minami, Kazuhito ; Okamura, Takeshi ; Baba, Hideo. / Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection : A comparison with conventional open gastrectomy. In: Hepato-gastroenterology. 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 114. pp. 627-632.
@article{32e218215baa42c3892c2553cde9f233,
title = "Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: A comparison with conventional open gastrectomy",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with lymphadenectomy has been revealed to be a useful treatment for early gastric cancer but oncological adequacy is controversial. Methodology: To assess the quality of lymphadenectomy, we evaluated the number of dissected lymph nodes and the non-compliance rate (defined as an absence of nodal tissue at a node station that should have been resected) and compared the data obtained from 102 patients treated by LDG with those from 90 patients treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG). Results: The numbers of nodes of Categories 1 and 2, which correspond respectively to perigastric and retroperitoneal nodes, did not differ significantly between the LDG group and the ODG group. In the LDG group compared to the ODG group, there were significantly more right paracardial nodes (No. 1) but there were significantly fewer infrapyloric nodes (No. 6). However, the difference in infrapyloric nodes (No. 6) became insignificant when we re-analyzed and compared the ODG group and the patients (n=42) whose LDGs were performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Conclusions: The curability of gastric cancer on LDG was almost equivalent to that of ODG from the viewpoint of lymph node dissection, if the LDG is performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. These data suggested that LDG with lymphadenectomy could possibly be adopted for advanced gastric cancer treatment under proper quality control, such as that provided by an experienced laparoscopic team.",
author = "Osamu Ikeda and Yoshihisa Sakaguchi and Yasushi Toh and Kippei Oogaki and Eiji Oki and Kazuhito Minami and Takeshi Okamura and Hideo Baba",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5754/hge10089",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "627--632",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "114",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection

T2 - A comparison with conventional open gastrectomy

AU - Ikeda, Osamu

AU - Sakaguchi, Yoshihisa

AU - Toh, Yasushi

AU - Oogaki, Kippei

AU - Oki, Eiji

AU - Minami, Kazuhito

AU - Okamura, Takeshi

AU - Baba, Hideo

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Background/Aims: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with lymphadenectomy has been revealed to be a useful treatment for early gastric cancer but oncological adequacy is controversial. Methodology: To assess the quality of lymphadenectomy, we evaluated the number of dissected lymph nodes and the non-compliance rate (defined as an absence of nodal tissue at a node station that should have been resected) and compared the data obtained from 102 patients treated by LDG with those from 90 patients treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG). Results: The numbers of nodes of Categories 1 and 2, which correspond respectively to perigastric and retroperitoneal nodes, did not differ significantly between the LDG group and the ODG group. In the LDG group compared to the ODG group, there were significantly more right paracardial nodes (No. 1) but there were significantly fewer infrapyloric nodes (No. 6). However, the difference in infrapyloric nodes (No. 6) became insignificant when we re-analyzed and compared the ODG group and the patients (n=42) whose LDGs were performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Conclusions: The curability of gastric cancer on LDG was almost equivalent to that of ODG from the viewpoint of lymph node dissection, if the LDG is performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. These data suggested that LDG with lymphadenectomy could possibly be adopted for advanced gastric cancer treatment under proper quality control, such as that provided by an experienced laparoscopic team.

AB - Background/Aims: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with lymphadenectomy has been revealed to be a useful treatment for early gastric cancer but oncological adequacy is controversial. Methodology: To assess the quality of lymphadenectomy, we evaluated the number of dissected lymph nodes and the non-compliance rate (defined as an absence of nodal tissue at a node station that should have been resected) and compared the data obtained from 102 patients treated by LDG with those from 90 patients treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG). Results: The numbers of nodes of Categories 1 and 2, which correspond respectively to perigastric and retroperitoneal nodes, did not differ significantly between the LDG group and the ODG group. In the LDG group compared to the ODG group, there were significantly more right paracardial nodes (No. 1) but there were significantly fewer infrapyloric nodes (No. 6). However, the difference in infrapyloric nodes (No. 6) became insignificant when we re-analyzed and compared the ODG group and the patients (n=42) whose LDGs were performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Conclusions: The curability of gastric cancer on LDG was almost equivalent to that of ODG from the viewpoint of lymph node dissection, if the LDG is performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. These data suggested that LDG with lymphadenectomy could possibly be adopted for advanced gastric cancer treatment under proper quality control, such as that provided by an experienced laparoscopic team.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860583954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860583954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5754/hge10089

DO - 10.5754/hge10089

M3 - Article

C2 - 22353532

AN - SCOPUS:84860583954

VL - 59

SP - 627

EP - 632

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 114

ER -