Evaluation of T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient of the masseter muscle by clenching

T. Shiraishi, Toru Chikui, Kazunori Yoshiura, K. Yuasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in T 2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the masseter muscle by clenching in healthy volunteers. Methods: 37 volunteers were enrolled in the study. We measured bite force using pressuresensitive paper and a T 2 map. The ADC map was obtained at rest, during clenching, immediately after and 5 min after clenching. The spin-echo sequence was used to calculate T2, and single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging was used to calculate the ADC. The motion-probing gradients (MPGs) were applied separately along the posterior-to-anterior (PA), right-to-left (RL) and superior-to-inferior (SI) directions, with b values of 0, 300 and 600 smm -2 in each direction. ADC-PA, ADC-RL, and ADC-SI values were obtained, and we calculated the ADC-iso for the mean diffusivity. Results: There were no significant differences between the stronger and weaker sides of bite force before, during or 5 min after clenching for T2 and ADC. The bite force had little effect on these parameters; thus, we used the average of the two sides for the following analyses. Time course analysis of ADC-iso, ADC-PA, ADC-RL and ADC-SI demonstrated a marked increase after clenching and a rapid decrease immediately after clenching, although they did not completely return to the initial values; however, the change in ADC-RL was significantly greater than those in ADC-PA or ADC-SI (P < 0.001 each). The changes in T2 were similar to those of ADC, although not as marked. Conclusions: ADC (especially ADC-RL) was altered by contraction of the masseter muscle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-41
Number of pages7
JournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Masseter Muscle
Bite Force
Echo-Planar Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient of the masseter muscle by clenching. / Shiraishi, T.; Chikui, Toru; Yoshiura, Kazunori; Yuasa, K.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 35-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2383eedb9d942d39ffa34016704a72f,
title = "Evaluation of T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient of the masseter muscle by clenching",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in T 2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the masseter muscle by clenching in healthy volunteers. Methods: 37 volunteers were enrolled in the study. We measured bite force using pressuresensitive paper and a T 2 map. The ADC map was obtained at rest, during clenching, immediately after and 5 min after clenching. The spin-echo sequence was used to calculate T2, and single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging was used to calculate the ADC. The motion-probing gradients (MPGs) were applied separately along the posterior-to-anterior (PA), right-to-left (RL) and superior-to-inferior (SI) directions, with b values of 0, 300 and 600 smm -2 in each direction. ADC-PA, ADC-RL, and ADC-SI values were obtained, and we calculated the ADC-iso for the mean diffusivity. Results: There were no significant differences between the stronger and weaker sides of bite force before, during or 5 min after clenching for T2 and ADC. The bite force had little effect on these parameters; thus, we used the average of the two sides for the following analyses. Time course analysis of ADC-iso, ADC-PA, ADC-RL and ADC-SI demonstrated a marked increase after clenching and a rapid decrease immediately after clenching, although they did not completely return to the initial values; however, the change in ADC-RL was significantly greater than those in ADC-PA or ADC-SI (P < 0.001 each). The changes in T2 were similar to those of ADC, although not as marked. Conclusions: ADC (especially ADC-RL) was altered by contraction of the masseter muscle.",
author = "T. Shiraishi and Toru Chikui and Kazunori Yoshiura and K. Yuasa",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1259/dmfr/15607259",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "35--41",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of T2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient of the masseter muscle by clenching

AU - Shiraishi, T.

AU - Chikui, Toru

AU - Yoshiura, Kazunori

AU - Yuasa, K.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in T 2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the masseter muscle by clenching in healthy volunteers. Methods: 37 volunteers were enrolled in the study. We measured bite force using pressuresensitive paper and a T 2 map. The ADC map was obtained at rest, during clenching, immediately after and 5 min after clenching. The spin-echo sequence was used to calculate T2, and single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging was used to calculate the ADC. The motion-probing gradients (MPGs) were applied separately along the posterior-to-anterior (PA), right-to-left (RL) and superior-to-inferior (SI) directions, with b values of 0, 300 and 600 smm -2 in each direction. ADC-PA, ADC-RL, and ADC-SI values were obtained, and we calculated the ADC-iso for the mean diffusivity. Results: There were no significant differences between the stronger and weaker sides of bite force before, during or 5 min after clenching for T2 and ADC. The bite force had little effect on these parameters; thus, we used the average of the two sides for the following analyses. Time course analysis of ADC-iso, ADC-PA, ADC-RL and ADC-SI demonstrated a marked increase after clenching and a rapid decrease immediately after clenching, although they did not completely return to the initial values; however, the change in ADC-RL was significantly greater than those in ADC-PA or ADC-SI (P < 0.001 each). The changes in T2 were similar to those of ADC, although not as marked. Conclusions: ADC (especially ADC-RL) was altered by contraction of the masseter muscle.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in T 2 values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the masseter muscle by clenching in healthy volunteers. Methods: 37 volunteers were enrolled in the study. We measured bite force using pressuresensitive paper and a T 2 map. The ADC map was obtained at rest, during clenching, immediately after and 5 min after clenching. The spin-echo sequence was used to calculate T2, and single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging was used to calculate the ADC. The motion-probing gradients (MPGs) were applied separately along the posterior-to-anterior (PA), right-to-left (RL) and superior-to-inferior (SI) directions, with b values of 0, 300 and 600 smm -2 in each direction. ADC-PA, ADC-RL, and ADC-SI values were obtained, and we calculated the ADC-iso for the mean diffusivity. Results: There were no significant differences between the stronger and weaker sides of bite force before, during or 5 min after clenching for T2 and ADC. The bite force had little effect on these parameters; thus, we used the average of the two sides for the following analyses. Time course analysis of ADC-iso, ADC-PA, ADC-RL and ADC-SI demonstrated a marked increase after clenching and a rapid decrease immediately after clenching, although they did not completely return to the initial values; however, the change in ADC-RL was significantly greater than those in ADC-PA or ADC-SI (P < 0.001 each). The changes in T2 were similar to those of ADC, although not as marked. Conclusions: ADC (especially ADC-RL) was altered by contraction of the masseter muscle.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651081185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651081185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/dmfr/15607259

DO - 10.1259/dmfr/15607259

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 35

EP - 41

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

IS - 1

ER -