Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees: Key role of regeneration dynamics

Yoh Iwasa, Akiko Satake, Yuuya Tachiki

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The variable and synchronous production of seeds by plant populations is called masting or mast seeding and is observed in diverse forests (Kelly 1994). Many flowers and fruits are produced one year (called a mast year) but little reproductive activity occurs during the several subsequent years until the next mast year (Herrera et al. 1998, Koening and Knops 1998, 2000, Koening et al. 1999). The variance in the reproductive activity of trees between years is large. It cannot be simply a result of environmental fluctuation in annual productivity (Tamura and Hiura 1998). Many studies on masting have focused on adaptive significance (Kelly and Sork 2002). A popular hypothesis is the predator satiation theory - that is, seed predators starve during non-mast years, while they are unable to consume all the seeds during mast years (Janzen 1971, Silvertown 1980, Nilsson and Wästljung 1987, van Schaik et al. 1993). An alternative but not mutually exclusive hypothesis is pollination efficiency: in mast years, trees receive a lot of outcross pollen, which may improve fruiting success compared with reproduction in non-mast years (Nilsson and Wästljung 1987, Smith et al. 1990, van Schaik et al. 1993, Shibata et al. 1998, Kelly et al. 2001, Rees et al. 2002, Satake and Bjørnstad 2004).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTemporal Dynamics and Ecological Process
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages191-223
Number of pages33
ISBN (Electronic)9781139048170
ISBN (Print)9780521198639
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Reproduction
Regeneration
Seeds
predators
satiety
seeds
Satiation
fruiting
Pollination
pollination
sowing
pollen
Pollen
flowers
fruits
Fruit
Population
Forests

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Iwasa, Y., Satake, A., & Tachiki, Y. (2012). Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees: Key role of regeneration dynamics. In Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process (pp. 191-223). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048170.011

Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees : Key role of regeneration dynamics. / Iwasa, Yoh; Satake, Akiko; Tachiki, Yuuya.

Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 191-223.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Iwasa, Y, Satake, A & Tachiki, Y 2012, Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees: Key role of regeneration dynamics. in Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process. Cambridge University Press, pp. 191-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048170.011
Iwasa Y, Satake A, Tachiki Y. Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees: Key role of regeneration dynamics. In Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process. Cambridge University Press. 2012. p. 191-223 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048170.011
Iwasa, Yoh ; Satake, Akiko ; Tachiki, Yuuya. / Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees : Key role of regeneration dynamics. Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process. Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 191-223
@inbook{e635d1f826ea41a69f968cd53d2cc0a7,
title = "Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees: Key role of regeneration dynamics",
abstract = "The variable and synchronous production of seeds by plant populations is called masting or mast seeding and is observed in diverse forests (Kelly 1994). Many flowers and fruits are produced one year (called a mast year) but little reproductive activity occurs during the several subsequent years until the next mast year (Herrera et al. 1998, Koening and Knops 1998, 2000, Koening et al. 1999). The variance in the reproductive activity of trees between years is large. It cannot be simply a result of environmental fluctuation in annual productivity (Tamura and Hiura 1998). Many studies on masting have focused on adaptive significance (Kelly and Sork 2002). A popular hypothesis is the predator satiation theory - that is, seed predators starve during non-mast years, while they are unable to consume all the seeds during mast years (Janzen 1971, Silvertown 1980, Nilsson and W{\"a}stljung 1987, van Schaik et al. 1993). An alternative but not mutually exclusive hypothesis is pollination efficiency: in mast years, trees receive a lot of outcross pollen, which may improve fruiting success compared with reproduction in non-mast years (Nilsson and W{\"a}stljung 1987, Smith et al. 1990, van Schaik et al. 1993, Shibata et al. 1998, Kelly et al. 2001, Rees et al. 2002, Satake and Bj{\o}rnstad 2004).",
author = "Yoh Iwasa and Akiko Satake and Yuuya Tachiki",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139048170.011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780521198639",
pages = "191--223",
booktitle = "Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Evolution of synchronised and intermittent reproduction (masting) of trees

T2 - Key role of regeneration dynamics

AU - Iwasa, Yoh

AU - Satake, Akiko

AU - Tachiki, Yuuya

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The variable and synchronous production of seeds by plant populations is called masting or mast seeding and is observed in diverse forests (Kelly 1994). Many flowers and fruits are produced one year (called a mast year) but little reproductive activity occurs during the several subsequent years until the next mast year (Herrera et al. 1998, Koening and Knops 1998, 2000, Koening et al. 1999). The variance in the reproductive activity of trees between years is large. It cannot be simply a result of environmental fluctuation in annual productivity (Tamura and Hiura 1998). Many studies on masting have focused on adaptive significance (Kelly and Sork 2002). A popular hypothesis is the predator satiation theory - that is, seed predators starve during non-mast years, while they are unable to consume all the seeds during mast years (Janzen 1971, Silvertown 1980, Nilsson and Wästljung 1987, van Schaik et al. 1993). An alternative but not mutually exclusive hypothesis is pollination efficiency: in mast years, trees receive a lot of outcross pollen, which may improve fruiting success compared with reproduction in non-mast years (Nilsson and Wästljung 1987, Smith et al. 1990, van Schaik et al. 1993, Shibata et al. 1998, Kelly et al. 2001, Rees et al. 2002, Satake and Bjørnstad 2004).

AB - The variable and synchronous production of seeds by plant populations is called masting or mast seeding and is observed in diverse forests (Kelly 1994). Many flowers and fruits are produced one year (called a mast year) but little reproductive activity occurs during the several subsequent years until the next mast year (Herrera et al. 1998, Koening and Knops 1998, 2000, Koening et al. 1999). The variance in the reproductive activity of trees between years is large. It cannot be simply a result of environmental fluctuation in annual productivity (Tamura and Hiura 1998). Many studies on masting have focused on adaptive significance (Kelly and Sork 2002). A popular hypothesis is the predator satiation theory - that is, seed predators starve during non-mast years, while they are unable to consume all the seeds during mast years (Janzen 1971, Silvertown 1980, Nilsson and Wästljung 1987, van Schaik et al. 1993). An alternative but not mutually exclusive hypothesis is pollination efficiency: in mast years, trees receive a lot of outcross pollen, which may improve fruiting success compared with reproduction in non-mast years (Nilsson and Wästljung 1987, Smith et al. 1990, van Schaik et al. 1993, Shibata et al. 1998, Kelly et al. 2001, Rees et al. 2002, Satake and Bjørnstad 2004).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011333320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011333320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139048170.011

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139048170.011

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85011333320

SN - 9780521198639

SP - 191

EP - 223

BT - Temporal Dynamics and Ecological Process

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -