Evolutionary optimization of transonic airfoils for static and dynamic trim performance

Michael Candon, Robert Carrese, Nishit Joseph, Hideaki Ogawa, Pier Marzocca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development and accelerated use of optimization frameworks in aircraft design is a testament to their ability to identify optimal and often non-intuitive shapes as a result of multi-disciplinary design objectives. Airfoil design is a continuously revised multi-disciplinary problem, and is pivotal to illustrate the performance of optimization frameworks involving numerical simulation, flexible shape parametrization, and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. An often overlooked component of this classic problem is to consider the dynamic aeroelastic behavior under trim conditions, which can generate explicit boundaries to the flight envelope. Trim introduces a significantly strong coupling with objectives governing static performance, e.g. aerodynamic and/or structural, thereby resulting in a highly nonlinear and discontinuous design space. In this paper, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework for multi-disciplinary performance improvement is presented, pertaining to aerodynamic, structural and aeroelastic design criteria at trim conditions. The framework is assisted by the construction of adaptive Kriging surrogates, which is cooperatively used with the numerical solver to identify optimal solutions within a computational constraint. Designer preferences are introduced to reflect the optimal compromise between the objectives. Results of the optimization process indicate a large spread in design variable influence and interaction, and a subtle yet clear distinction between all objectives is illustrated through the catalog of final airfoil candidates obtained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1088
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Airfoils
Aerodynamics
Flight envelopes
Evolutionary algorithms
Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
Aircraft
Computer simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Evolutionary optimization of transonic airfoils for static and dynamic trim performance. / Candon, Michael; Carrese, Robert; Joseph, Nishit; Ogawa, Hideaki; Marzocca, Pier.

In: Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 28, No. 8, 01.05.2017, p. 1071-1088.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Candon, Michael ; Carrese, Robert ; Joseph, Nishit ; Ogawa, Hideaki ; Marzocca, Pier. / Evolutionary optimization of transonic airfoils for static and dynamic trim performance. In: Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 8. pp. 1071-1088.
@article{fac67b8bbebf4f758a0abbd94bb565ee,
title = "Evolutionary optimization of transonic airfoils for static and dynamic trim performance",
abstract = "The development and accelerated use of optimization frameworks in aircraft design is a testament to their ability to identify optimal and often non-intuitive shapes as a result of multi-disciplinary design objectives. Airfoil design is a continuously revised multi-disciplinary problem, and is pivotal to illustrate the performance of optimization frameworks involving numerical simulation, flexible shape parametrization, and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. An often overlooked component of this classic problem is to consider the dynamic aeroelastic behavior under trim conditions, which can generate explicit boundaries to the flight envelope. Trim introduces a significantly strong coupling with objectives governing static performance, e.g. aerodynamic and/or structural, thereby resulting in a highly nonlinear and discontinuous design space. In this paper, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework for multi-disciplinary performance improvement is presented, pertaining to aerodynamic, structural and aeroelastic design criteria at trim conditions. The framework is assisted by the construction of adaptive Kriging surrogates, which is cooperatively used with the numerical solver to identify optimal solutions within a computational constraint. Designer preferences are introduced to reflect the optimal compromise between the objectives. Results of the optimization process indicate a large spread in design variable influence and interaction, and a subtle yet clear distinction between all objectives is illustrated through the catalog of final airfoil candidates obtained.",
author = "Michael Candon and Robert Carrese and Nishit Joseph and Hideaki Ogawa and Pier Marzocca",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1045389X16679019",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1071--1088",
journal = "Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures",
issn = "1045-389X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolutionary optimization of transonic airfoils for static and dynamic trim performance

AU - Candon, Michael

AU - Carrese, Robert

AU - Joseph, Nishit

AU - Ogawa, Hideaki

AU - Marzocca, Pier

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - The development and accelerated use of optimization frameworks in aircraft design is a testament to their ability to identify optimal and often non-intuitive shapes as a result of multi-disciplinary design objectives. Airfoil design is a continuously revised multi-disciplinary problem, and is pivotal to illustrate the performance of optimization frameworks involving numerical simulation, flexible shape parametrization, and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. An often overlooked component of this classic problem is to consider the dynamic aeroelastic behavior under trim conditions, which can generate explicit boundaries to the flight envelope. Trim introduces a significantly strong coupling with objectives governing static performance, e.g. aerodynamic and/or structural, thereby resulting in a highly nonlinear and discontinuous design space. In this paper, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework for multi-disciplinary performance improvement is presented, pertaining to aerodynamic, structural and aeroelastic design criteria at trim conditions. The framework is assisted by the construction of adaptive Kriging surrogates, which is cooperatively used with the numerical solver to identify optimal solutions within a computational constraint. Designer preferences are introduced to reflect the optimal compromise between the objectives. Results of the optimization process indicate a large spread in design variable influence and interaction, and a subtle yet clear distinction between all objectives is illustrated through the catalog of final airfoil candidates obtained.

AB - The development and accelerated use of optimization frameworks in aircraft design is a testament to their ability to identify optimal and often non-intuitive shapes as a result of multi-disciplinary design objectives. Airfoil design is a continuously revised multi-disciplinary problem, and is pivotal to illustrate the performance of optimization frameworks involving numerical simulation, flexible shape parametrization, and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. An often overlooked component of this classic problem is to consider the dynamic aeroelastic behavior under trim conditions, which can generate explicit boundaries to the flight envelope. Trim introduces a significantly strong coupling with objectives governing static performance, e.g. aerodynamic and/or structural, thereby resulting in a highly nonlinear and discontinuous design space. In this paper, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework for multi-disciplinary performance improvement is presented, pertaining to aerodynamic, structural and aeroelastic design criteria at trim conditions. The framework is assisted by the construction of adaptive Kriging surrogates, which is cooperatively used with the numerical solver to identify optimal solutions within a computational constraint. Designer preferences are introduced to reflect the optimal compromise between the objectives. Results of the optimization process indicate a large spread in design variable influence and interaction, and a subtle yet clear distinction between all objectives is illustrated through the catalog of final airfoil candidates obtained.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019156908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019156908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1045389X16679019

DO - 10.1177/1045389X16679019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019156908

VL - 28

SP - 1071

EP - 1088

JO - Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures

JF - Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures

SN - 1045-389X

IS - 8

ER -