TY - JOUR
T1 - Evosystem services
T2 - An evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being
AU - Faith, Daniel P.
AU - Magallón, Susana
AU - Hendry, Andrew P.
AU - Conti, Elena
AU - Yahara, Tetsukazu
AU - Donoghue, Michael J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of the organizers of the second Open Science Conference of DIVERSITAS, held in Cape Town in 2009, and the funding provided by the Australian Research Council. We thank three anonymous reviewers, two guest editors, and our colleagues on the scientific committee for bioGENESIS for helpful discussions.
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - A framework for exploring regional-scale trade-offs among ecosystem services and biodiversity protection has been established for some time, and it is clear that optimizing these trade-offs provides a strategy to address targets for a reduced rate of biodiversity loss. Recent trade-off studies have highlighted the need for better biodiversity measures, to complement measures of ecosystem services. Biodiversity typically has been linked in this context to existence and other non-use values. We argue that biodiversity will have a stronger role in such trade-off analyses if measures of biodiversity better reflect additional current and future services. These 'evosystem services' have been, and, if we are careful, can continue to be provided by the evolutionary process. Some services have been provided through evolution operating in the past, and a phylogenetic diversity measure can help us to quantify these current and potential future benefits derived from the tree of life. Furthermore, a variety of evosystem services are delivered through ongoing contemporary evolution, and value should therefore be placed on the maintenance of healthy evosystems. We argue that the concept of evosystem services could be useful as a complement to the traditional concept of ecosystem services. Together, these reflect a fuller range of the services supported by biodiversity, and thereby provide a sounder basis for conservation planning and decision-making.
AB - A framework for exploring regional-scale trade-offs among ecosystem services and biodiversity protection has been established for some time, and it is clear that optimizing these trade-offs provides a strategy to address targets for a reduced rate of biodiversity loss. Recent trade-off studies have highlighted the need for better biodiversity measures, to complement measures of ecosystem services. Biodiversity typically has been linked in this context to existence and other non-use values. We argue that biodiversity will have a stronger role in such trade-off analyses if measures of biodiversity better reflect additional current and future services. These 'evosystem services' have been, and, if we are careful, can continue to be provided by the evolutionary process. Some services have been provided through evolution operating in the past, and a phylogenetic diversity measure can help us to quantify these current and potential future benefits derived from the tree of life. Furthermore, a variety of evosystem services are delivered through ongoing contemporary evolution, and value should therefore be placed on the maintenance of healthy evosystems. We argue that the concept of evosystem services could be useful as a complement to the traditional concept of ecosystem services. Together, these reflect a fuller range of the services supported by biodiversity, and thereby provide a sounder basis for conservation planning and decision-making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954865387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954865387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:77954865387
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 2
SP - 66
EP - 74
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
IS - 1-2
ER -