Abstract
Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 397-407 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Ecological Economics |
| Volume | 146 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Science(all)
- Economics and Econometrics
Cite this
Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation. / Wakamatsu, Mihoko; Shin, Kong Joo; Wilson, Clevo; Managi, Shunsuke.
In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 146, 01.04.2018, p. 397-407.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation
AU - Wakamatsu, Mihoko
AU - Shin, Kong Joo
AU - Wilson, Clevo
AU - Managi, Shunsuke
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.
AB - Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037051605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037051605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037051605
VL - 146
SP - 397
EP - 407
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
SN - 0921-8009
ER -