Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation

Mihoko Wakamatsu, Kong Joo Shin, Clevo Wilson, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-407
Number of pages11
JournalEcological Economics
Volume146
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

whale
valuation
whaling
economics
Economic valuation
Japan
Conservation
Whaling
nature conservation
endangered species
environmental policy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation. / Wakamatsu, Mihoko; Shin, Kong Joo; Wilson, Clevo; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 146, 01.04.2018, p. 397-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c155ed529f2640a3a6ce1f43f86df769,
title = "Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation",
abstract = "Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.",
author = "Mihoko Wakamatsu and Shin, {Kong Joo} and Clevo Wilson and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
pages = "397--407",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation

AU - Wakamatsu, Mihoko

AU - Shin, Kong Joo

AU - Wilson, Clevo

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.

AB - Wildlife conservation is an important part of environmental policy; in the case of whales, we must consider the balance between two uses: whaling and whale watching. This study provides an economic valuation of whale conservation using stated-preference choice experiment data collected from anti-whaling populations in Australia and Japan. Using a mixed logit model, we find higher economic valuation for a ban on whaling than for conventional protection actions in Australia. Despite the popularity of whale watching, limiting protections for species that are observed during whale-watching tours do not necessarily increase valuation. In contrast, we do not find a policy favored among the anti-whaling Japanese, who are in the minority and are significantly different from the general population in socio-demographic terms. Nonetheless, protection focusing on endangered whales is utility increasing for both countries. Overall, the results show a significant difference even among the anti-whaling populations of the two countries, suggesting a high bar for reaching international consensus over whaling. Lastly, the results from a latent class model also suggest that the level of demand for whale conservation in Japan could match the Australian level by proclaiming the importance of conserving endangered species and providing information on whales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037051605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037051605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037051605

VL - 146

SP - 397

EP - 407

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -