Fast Track THR: One Hospital's Experience with a 2-Day Length of Stay Protocol for Total Hip Replacement

Lawrence V. Gulotta, Douglas E. Padgett, Thomas P. Sculco, Michael Urban, Stephen Lyman, Bryan J. Nestor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Current trends in total joint replacement have focused on shorter hospital stays. Purpose: This study aimed to determine if a pathway for total hip replacement (THR) with the goal of a 2-day discharge (fast track) is safe and effective compared to our traditional pathway (control). Methods: One hundred forty-nine patients undergoing unilateral, uncomplicated, THR were enrolled in an accelerated postoperative pathway and 134 were enrolled in the traditional pathway. Patients were followed prospectively and outcomes included hospital length of stay, intra- and postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations. A statistical model was created to determine factors predictive of a 2-day discharge. Results: At 1 year, there were no differences in complications, readmissions, or reoperations. The average length of stay decreased from 4.1 to 2.6 days (p & 0.0001). In the fast track group, 58% of patients were discharged home within 2 days. Barriers to a 2-day discharge were postoperative pain, nausea, and dizziness. The only preoperative factor that was predictive of a 2-day discharge was hypertension. Conclusions: In a select group of patients, a protocol that allows for a 2-day discharge following THR is safe and effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-228
Number of pages6
JournalHSS Journal
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fast Track THR: One Hospital's Experience with a 2-Day Length of Stay Protocol for Total Hip Replacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this