TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility study of a PET-only amyloid quantification method
T2 - a comparison with visual interpretation
AU - Shimokawa, Natsumi
AU - Akamatsu, Go
AU - Kadosaki, Miyako
AU - Sasaki, Masayuki
N1 - Funding Information:
J-ADNI was supported by the following grants: Translational Research Promotion Project from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization of Japan; Research on Dementia, Health Labor Sciences Research Grant; Life Science Database Integration Project of Japan Science and Technology Agency; Research Association of Biotechnology (contributed by Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck-Banyu, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Pfizer Inc., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company), Japan, and a grant from an anonymous foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Objective: Visual evaluation is the standard for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) examination, though the result depends upon the physician’s subjective review of the images. Therefore, it is expected that objective quantitative evaluation is useful for image interpretation. In this study, we examined the usefulness of the quantitative evaluation of amyloid PET using a PET-only quantification method in comparison with visual evaluation. Methods: In this study we retrospectively investigated a total of 166 individuals, including 58 cognitively normal controls, 62 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and 46 individuals with early Alzheimer’s disease. They underwent 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B (PiB) PET examination through the Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI). Amyloid accumulation in cerebral cortices was assessed using visual and quantitative methods. The quantitative evaluation was performed using the adaptive template method and empirically PiB-prone region of interest, and the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in each area was obtained. Results: Visual evaluation and SUVR were significantly correlated in the cerebral cortices (ρ = 0.85–0.87; p < 0.05). In visual evaluation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 78%, 76%, and 77%, respectively. Meanwhile, for quantitative evaluation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77%, 79%, and 78% in mean cortical SUVR (mcSUVR) and 79%, 79%, and 79% in maximum SUVR (maxSUVR), respectively. Conclusion: The PET-only quantification method provided a concordant result with visual evaluation and was considered useful for amyloid PET.
AB - Objective: Visual evaluation is the standard for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) examination, though the result depends upon the physician’s subjective review of the images. Therefore, it is expected that objective quantitative evaluation is useful for image interpretation. In this study, we examined the usefulness of the quantitative evaluation of amyloid PET using a PET-only quantification method in comparison with visual evaluation. Methods: In this study we retrospectively investigated a total of 166 individuals, including 58 cognitively normal controls, 62 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and 46 individuals with early Alzheimer’s disease. They underwent 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B (PiB) PET examination through the Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI). Amyloid accumulation in cerebral cortices was assessed using visual and quantitative methods. The quantitative evaluation was performed using the adaptive template method and empirically PiB-prone region of interest, and the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in each area was obtained. Results: Visual evaluation and SUVR were significantly correlated in the cerebral cortices (ρ = 0.85–0.87; p < 0.05). In visual evaluation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 78%, 76%, and 77%, respectively. Meanwhile, for quantitative evaluation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77%, 79%, and 78% in mean cortical SUVR (mcSUVR) and 79%, 79%, and 79% in maximum SUVR (maxSUVR), respectively. Conclusion: The PET-only quantification method provided a concordant result with visual evaluation and was considered useful for amyloid PET.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086451445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086451445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12149-020-01486-3
DO - 10.1007/s12149-020-01486-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 32535743
AN - SCOPUS:85086451445
SN - 0914-7187
VL - 34
SP - 629
EP - 635
JO - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 9
ER -