TY - JOUR
T1 - Fine-tuning approach for segmentation of gliomas in brain magnetic resonance images with a machine learning method to normalize image differences among facilities
AU - Takahashi, Satoshi
AU - Takahashi, Masamichi
AU - Kinoshita, Manabu
AU - Miyake, Mototaka
AU - Kawaguchi, Risa
AU - Shinojima, Naoki
AU - Mukasa, Akitake
AU - Saito, Kuniaki
AU - Nagane, Motoo
AU - Otani, Ryohei
AU - Higuchi, Fumi
AU - Tanaka, Shota
AU - Hata, Nobuhiro
AU - Tamura, Kaoru
AU - Tateishi, Kensuke
AU - Nishikawa, Ryo
AU - Arita, Hideyuki
AU - Nonaka, Masahiro
AU - Uda, Takehiro
AU - Fukai, Junya
AU - Okita, Yoshiko
AU - Tsuyuguchi, Naohiro
AU - Kanemura, Yonehiro
AU - Kobayashi, Kazuma
AU - Sese, Jun
AU - Ichimura, Koichi
AU - Narita, Yoshitaka
AU - Hamamoto, Ryuji
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by JST CREST [Grant Number JPMJCR1689] and JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas [Grant Number JP18H04908].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/3/2
Y1 - 2021/3/2
N2 - Machine learning models for automated magnetic resonance image segmentation may be useful in aiding glioma detection. However, the image differences among facilities cause performance degradation and impede detection. This study proposes a method to solve this issue. We used the data from the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BraTS) and the Japanese cohort (JC) datasets. Three models for tumor segmentation are developed. In our methodology, the BraTS and JC models are trained on the BraTS and JC datasets, respectively, whereas the fine-tuning models are developed from the BraTS model and fine-tuned using the JC dataset. Our results show that the Dice coefficient score of the JC model for the test portion of the JC dataset was 0.779 ± 0.137, whereas that of the BraTS model was lower (0.717 ± 0.207). The mean Dice coefficient score of the fine-tuning model was 0.769 ± 0.138. There was a significant difference between the BraTS and JC models (p < 0.0001) and the BraTS and fine-tuning models (p = 0.002); however, no significant difference between the JC and fine-tuning models (p = 0.673). As our fine-tuning method requires fewer than 20 cases, this method is useful even in a facility where the number of glioma cases is small.
AB - Machine learning models for automated magnetic resonance image segmentation may be useful in aiding glioma detection. However, the image differences among facilities cause performance degradation and impede detection. This study proposes a method to solve this issue. We used the data from the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BraTS) and the Japanese cohort (JC) datasets. Three models for tumor segmentation are developed. In our methodology, the BraTS and JC models are trained on the BraTS and JC datasets, respectively, whereas the fine-tuning models are developed from the BraTS model and fine-tuned using the JC dataset. Our results show that the Dice coefficient score of the JC model for the test portion of the JC dataset was 0.779 ± 0.137, whereas that of the BraTS model was lower (0.717 ± 0.207). The mean Dice coefficient score of the fine-tuning model was 0.769 ± 0.138. There was a significant difference between the BraTS and JC models (p < 0.0001) and the BraTS and fine-tuning models (p = 0.002); however, no significant difference between the JC and fine-tuning models (p = 0.673). As our fine-tuning method requires fewer than 20 cases, this method is useful even in a facility where the number of glioma cases is small.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102700284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102700284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13061415
DO - 10.3390/cancers13061415
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102700284
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 6
M1 - 1415
ER -