TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional characterization of mismatch negativity to a visual stimulus
AU - Maekawa, Toshihiko
AU - Goto, Yoshinobu
AU - Kinukawa, Naoko
AU - Taniwaki, Takayuki
AU - Kanba, Shigenobu
AU - Tobimatsu, Shozo
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Drs. I. Czigler, H. Yabe and R. Näätänen for their helpful comments on this manuscript. We also thank Dr. Hamasaki for his editing of this manuscript. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE program and Grant-in Aid for Scientists, No 16390253 and No 16200005 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan.
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - Objective: To record mismatch negativity (MMN) to a visual stimulus fulfilling similar criteria to those of auditory MMN (A-MMN). Methods: Twelve normal adults were instructed to simultaneously listen to a story and to pay attention to a visual target. Three windmill patterns that differed in the number of vanes (standard, deviant, or target) were used as visual stimuli, and were randomly presented. To ensure endogeneity, standard and deviant stimuli were alternated. To vary differences between frequent (standard) and infrequent (deviant) stimuli, deviants were changed by modulating the number of vanes. To examine effects of physical features of the target stimulus on changes in detection, two target conditions were used. The deviant-related component (DRC) was obtained by subtracting event-related potentials (ERPs) to the deviant stimulus from those to the standard stimulus. Results: Seven subjects completed all phases of the experiment. Behavioral performances indicated that subjects' attention was directed by auditory context and identification of the target stimulus. Visual DRC appeared 150-300 ms after stimulus onset, and consisted of an early (DRN1) and a late (DRN2) component. Magnitude of deviancy from standard stimulus significantly influenced latency of DRN2 but not its magnitude, while changes in target stimulus affected latencies of both DRN1 and DRN2. Conclusions: Our DRCs satisfied criteria for A-MMN. In contrast to A-MMN, only latency of the DRC was associated with visual sensory discrimination and attentional reorienting. Significance: It is possible to record valid MMN to a visual stimulus, which allows the study of preattentive visual information processing.
AB - Objective: To record mismatch negativity (MMN) to a visual stimulus fulfilling similar criteria to those of auditory MMN (A-MMN). Methods: Twelve normal adults were instructed to simultaneously listen to a story and to pay attention to a visual target. Three windmill patterns that differed in the number of vanes (standard, deviant, or target) were used as visual stimuli, and were randomly presented. To ensure endogeneity, standard and deviant stimuli were alternated. To vary differences between frequent (standard) and infrequent (deviant) stimuli, deviants were changed by modulating the number of vanes. To examine effects of physical features of the target stimulus on changes in detection, two target conditions were used. The deviant-related component (DRC) was obtained by subtracting event-related potentials (ERPs) to the deviant stimulus from those to the standard stimulus. Results: Seven subjects completed all phases of the experiment. Behavioral performances indicated that subjects' attention was directed by auditory context and identification of the target stimulus. Visual DRC appeared 150-300 ms after stimulus onset, and consisted of an early (DRN1) and a late (DRN2) component. Magnitude of deviancy from standard stimulus significantly influenced latency of DRN2 but not its magnitude, while changes in target stimulus affected latencies of both DRN1 and DRN2. Conclusions: Our DRCs satisfied criteria for A-MMN. In contrast to A-MMN, only latency of the DRC was associated with visual sensory discrimination and attentional reorienting. Significance: It is possible to record valid MMN to a visual stimulus, which allows the study of preattentive visual information processing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24644487769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24644487769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 16122977
AN - SCOPUS:24644487769
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 116
SP - 2392
EP - 2402
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
IS - 10
ER -