Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Masaru Morita, hajime otsu, Hiroyuki Kawano, Yuta Kasagi, Yasue Kimura, Hiroshi Saeki, Kouji Andou, Satoshi Ida, Eiji Oki, Eriko Tokunaga, Tetsuo Ikeda, Tetsuya Kusumoto, Yoshihiko Maehara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the gender differences in the prognosis, as well as mortality and morbidity, of patients who have undergone esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods: The clinical results of esophagectomy were compared between 975 male and 156 female patients with esophageal cancer. Results: The male to female ratios of cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer were 1.87 and 7.38, respectively (P < 0.01). The incidence of preoperative comorbidities was 32.4 and 17.4 %, respectively, and the rates of both tobacco and alcohol abuse were significantly lower in the females than in the males. The mortality rate was lower in the females (3.8 %) than in the males (5.7 %), although the differences were not significant. The overall survival was significantly better in the female than in the male patients (P = 0.039). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 32.6 and 20.5 % in the males and 39.5 and 32.5 % in the females, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed gender to be an independent prognostic factor. However, no significant differences were recognized in disease-specific survival. Conclusions: These results suggest that the prognosis of females with esophageal cancer is better than that of males after esophagectomy, most likely due to multiple clinical factors, such as a more favorable lifestyle and general status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-512
Number of pages8
JournalSurgery today
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Esophageal Neoplasms
Survival
Mortality
Alcoholism
Tobacco
Life Style
Comorbidity
Thorax
Multivariate Analysis
Survival Rate
Morbidity
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. / Morita, Masaru; otsu, hajime; Kawano, Hiroyuki; Kasagi, Yuta; Kimura, Yasue; Saeki, Hiroshi; Andou, Kouji; Ida, Satoshi; Oki, Eiji; Tokunaga, Eriko; Ikeda, Tetsuo; Kusumoto, Tetsuya; Maehara, Yoshihiko.

In: Surgery today, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 505-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morita, M, otsu, H, Kawano, H, Kasagi, Y, Kimura, Y, Saeki, H, Andou, K, Ida, S, Oki, E, Tokunaga, E, Ikeda, T, Kusumoto, T & Maehara, Y 2014, 'Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer', Surgery today, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 505-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0573-x
Morita, Masaru ; otsu, hajime ; Kawano, Hiroyuki ; Kasagi, Yuta ; Kimura, Yasue ; Saeki, Hiroshi ; Andou, Kouji ; Ida, Satoshi ; Oki, Eiji ; Tokunaga, Eriko ; Ikeda, Tetsuo ; Kusumoto, Tetsuya ; Maehara, Yoshihiko. / Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. In: Surgery today. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 505-512.
@article{70d400f172cb487293bf18933961fb43,
title = "Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the gender differences in the prognosis, as well as mortality and morbidity, of patients who have undergone esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods: The clinical results of esophagectomy were compared between 975 male and 156 female patients with esophageal cancer. Results: The male to female ratios of cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer were 1.87 and 7.38, respectively (P < 0.01). The incidence of preoperative comorbidities was 32.4 and 17.4 {\%}, respectively, and the rates of both tobacco and alcohol abuse were significantly lower in the females than in the males. The mortality rate was lower in the females (3.8 {\%}) than in the males (5.7 {\%}), although the differences were not significant. The overall survival was significantly better in the female than in the male patients (P = 0.039). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 32.6 and 20.5 {\%} in the males and 39.5 and 32.5 {\%} in the females, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed gender to be an independent prognostic factor. However, no significant differences were recognized in disease-specific survival. Conclusions: These results suggest that the prognosis of females with esophageal cancer is better than that of males after esophagectomy, most likely due to multiple clinical factors, such as a more favorable lifestyle and general status.",
author = "Masaru Morita and hajime otsu and Hiroyuki Kawano and Yuta Kasagi and Yasue Kimura and Hiroshi Saeki and Kouji Andou and Satoshi Ida and Eiji Oki and Eriko Tokunaga and Tetsuo Ikeda and Tetsuya Kusumoto and Yoshihiko Maehara",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00595-013-0573-x",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "505--512",
journal = "Surgery Today",
issn = "0941-1291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

AU - Morita, Masaru

AU - otsu, hajime

AU - Kawano, Hiroyuki

AU - Kasagi, Yuta

AU - Kimura, Yasue

AU - Saeki, Hiroshi

AU - Andou, Kouji

AU - Ida, Satoshi

AU - Oki, Eiji

AU - Tokunaga, Eriko

AU - Ikeda, Tetsuo

AU - Kusumoto, Tetsuya

AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the gender differences in the prognosis, as well as mortality and morbidity, of patients who have undergone esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods: The clinical results of esophagectomy were compared between 975 male and 156 female patients with esophageal cancer. Results: The male to female ratios of cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer were 1.87 and 7.38, respectively (P < 0.01). The incidence of preoperative comorbidities was 32.4 and 17.4 %, respectively, and the rates of both tobacco and alcohol abuse were significantly lower in the females than in the males. The mortality rate was lower in the females (3.8 %) than in the males (5.7 %), although the differences were not significant. The overall survival was significantly better in the female than in the male patients (P = 0.039). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 32.6 and 20.5 % in the males and 39.5 and 32.5 % in the females, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed gender to be an independent prognostic factor. However, no significant differences were recognized in disease-specific survival. Conclusions: These results suggest that the prognosis of females with esophageal cancer is better than that of males after esophagectomy, most likely due to multiple clinical factors, such as a more favorable lifestyle and general status.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the gender differences in the prognosis, as well as mortality and morbidity, of patients who have undergone esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods: The clinical results of esophagectomy were compared between 975 male and 156 female patients with esophageal cancer. Results: The male to female ratios of cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer were 1.87 and 7.38, respectively (P < 0.01). The incidence of preoperative comorbidities was 32.4 and 17.4 %, respectively, and the rates of both tobacco and alcohol abuse were significantly lower in the females than in the males. The mortality rate was lower in the females (3.8 %) than in the males (5.7 %), although the differences were not significant. The overall survival was significantly better in the female than in the male patients (P = 0.039). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 32.6 and 20.5 % in the males and 39.5 and 32.5 % in the females, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed gender to be an independent prognostic factor. However, no significant differences were recognized in disease-specific survival. Conclusions: These results suggest that the prognosis of females with esophageal cancer is better than that of males after esophagectomy, most likely due to multiple clinical factors, such as a more favorable lifestyle and general status.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896715557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896715557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00595-013-0573-x

DO - 10.1007/s00595-013-0573-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23563736

AN - SCOPUS:84896715557

VL - 44

SP - 505

EP - 512

JO - Surgery Today

JF - Surgery Today

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 3

ER -