Generic finite element models of orthodontic mini-implants

Are they reliable?

Mhd Hassan Al Bogha, Ichiro Takahashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many finite element (FE) studies used different settings for modeling orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs). This study aims to compare different approaches for modeling OMI with FE method, to exhibit the role of key factors in modeling process. A computerized tomography (CT) dataset of a living human is used to develop subject-specific FE model of bone specimen, and a microCT was used to generate the geometry of OMI. Another five models were developed to assess the effect of changing different settings of FE modeling process. These five models differed from the subject-specific model in either: (i) bone properties' assignment method, (ii) geometries and constrains' conditions, or (iii) simulation method of bone-implant contact (BIC). The models presented significant differences in maximum principal strain distribution. These differences were most apparent when the models differed either in the nature of BIC or the method of assigning bone properties. The models different only in bone geometries showed differences in the intensity of strain rather than its distribution pattern. There is a need for assessment and validation of all FE modeling approaches currently used for simulation of mechanical environment in the bone surrounding OMIs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3751-3756
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume48
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 5 2015

Fingerprint

Orthodontics
Bone
Bone and Bones
Geometry
X-Ray Microtomography
Computerized tomography
Needs Assessment
Tomography
Finite element method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Generic finite element models of orthodontic mini-implants : Are they reliable? / Al Bogha, Mhd Hassan; Takahashi, Ichiro.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 48, No. 14, 05.11.2015, p. 3751-3756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{387a9882147846d29d40220e81de91e0,
title = "Generic finite element models of orthodontic mini-implants: Are they reliable?",
abstract = "Many finite element (FE) studies used different settings for modeling orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs). This study aims to compare different approaches for modeling OMI with FE method, to exhibit the role of key factors in modeling process. A computerized tomography (CT) dataset of a living human is used to develop subject-specific FE model of bone specimen, and a microCT was used to generate the geometry of OMI. Another five models were developed to assess the effect of changing different settings of FE modeling process. These five models differed from the subject-specific model in either: (i) bone properties' assignment method, (ii) geometries and constrains' conditions, or (iii) simulation method of bone-implant contact (BIC). The models presented significant differences in maximum principal strain distribution. These differences were most apparent when the models differed either in the nature of BIC or the method of assigning bone properties. The models different only in bone geometries showed differences in the intensity of strain rather than its distribution pattern. There is a need for assessment and validation of all FE modeling approaches currently used for simulation of mechanical environment in the bone surrounding OMIs.",
author = "{Al Bogha}, {Mhd Hassan} and Ichiro Takahashi",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.015",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "3751--3756",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generic finite element models of orthodontic mini-implants

T2 - Are they reliable?

AU - Al Bogha, Mhd Hassan

AU - Takahashi, Ichiro

PY - 2015/11/5

Y1 - 2015/11/5

N2 - Many finite element (FE) studies used different settings for modeling orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs). This study aims to compare different approaches for modeling OMI with FE method, to exhibit the role of key factors in modeling process. A computerized tomography (CT) dataset of a living human is used to develop subject-specific FE model of bone specimen, and a microCT was used to generate the geometry of OMI. Another five models were developed to assess the effect of changing different settings of FE modeling process. These five models differed from the subject-specific model in either: (i) bone properties' assignment method, (ii) geometries and constrains' conditions, or (iii) simulation method of bone-implant contact (BIC). The models presented significant differences in maximum principal strain distribution. These differences were most apparent when the models differed either in the nature of BIC or the method of assigning bone properties. The models different only in bone geometries showed differences in the intensity of strain rather than its distribution pattern. There is a need for assessment and validation of all FE modeling approaches currently used for simulation of mechanical environment in the bone surrounding OMIs.

AB - Many finite element (FE) studies used different settings for modeling orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs). This study aims to compare different approaches for modeling OMI with FE method, to exhibit the role of key factors in modeling process. A computerized tomography (CT) dataset of a living human is used to develop subject-specific FE model of bone specimen, and a microCT was used to generate the geometry of OMI. Another five models were developed to assess the effect of changing different settings of FE modeling process. These five models differed from the subject-specific model in either: (i) bone properties' assignment method, (ii) geometries and constrains' conditions, or (iii) simulation method of bone-implant contact (BIC). The models presented significant differences in maximum principal strain distribution. These differences were most apparent when the models differed either in the nature of BIC or the method of assigning bone properties. The models different only in bone geometries showed differences in the intensity of strain rather than its distribution pattern. There is a need for assessment and validation of all FE modeling approaches currently used for simulation of mechanical environment in the bone surrounding OMIs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947128628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947128628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.015

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 3751

EP - 3756

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 14

ER -