Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited

Maxime Fournier, Aurélien Ull, Elodie Nicoleau, Yaohiro Inagaki, Michaël Odorico, Pierre Frugier, Stéphane Gin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aqueous dissolution rate measurements of nuclear glasses are a key step in the long-term behavior study of such waste forms. These rates are routinely normalized to the glass surface area in contact with solution, and experiments are very often carried out using crushed materials. Various methods have been implemented to determine the surface area of such glass powders, leading to differing values, with the notion of the reactive surface area of crushed glass remaining vague. In this study, around forty initial dissolution rate measurements were conducted following static and flow rate (SPFT, MCFT) measurement protocols at 90 °C, pH 10. The international reference glass (ISG), in the forms of powders with different particle sizes and polished monoliths, and soda-lime glass beads were examined. Although crushed glass grains clearly cannot be assimilated with spheres, it is when using the samples geometric surface (Sgeo) that the rates measured on powders are closest to those found for monoliths. Overestimation of the reactive surface when using the BET model (SBET) may be due to small physical features at the atomic scale - contributing to BET surface area but not to AFM surface area. Such features are very small compared with the thickness of water ingress in glass (a few hundred nanometers) and should not be considered in rate calculations. With a SBET/Sgeo ratio of 2.5 ± 0.2 for ISG powders, it is shown here that rates measured on powders and normalized to Sgeo should be divided by 1.3 and rates normalized to SBET should be multiplied by 1.9 in order to be compared with rates measured on a monolith. The use of glass beads indicates that the geometric surface gives a good estimation of glass reactive surface if sample geometry can be precisely described. Although data clearly shows the repeatability of measurements, results must be given with a high uncertainty of approximately ±25%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-154
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Nuclear Materials
Volume476
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

dissolving
Dissolution
Glass
glass
Powders
beads
calcium oxides
Lime
Contacts (fluid mechanics)
flow velocity
Particle size
Flow rate
atomic force microscopy
Geometry
Water
geometry
water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Cite this

Fournier, M., Ull, A., Nicoleau, E., Inagaki, Y., Odorico, M., Frugier, P., & Gin, S. (2016). Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 476, 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.028

Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited. / Fournier, Maxime; Ull, Aurélien; Nicoleau, Elodie; Inagaki, Yaohiro; Odorico, Michaël; Frugier, Pierre; Gin, Stéphane.

In: Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 476, 01.08.2016, p. 140-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fournier, M, Ull, A, Nicoleau, E, Inagaki, Y, Odorico, M, Frugier, P & Gin, S 2016, 'Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited', Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 476, pp. 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.028
Fournier, Maxime ; Ull, Aurélien ; Nicoleau, Elodie ; Inagaki, Yaohiro ; Odorico, Michaël ; Frugier, Pierre ; Gin, Stéphane. / Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited. In: Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2016 ; Vol. 476. pp. 140-154.
@article{ff82a0f67d824209a03ffbad888aa9d1,
title = "Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited",
abstract = "Aqueous dissolution rate measurements of nuclear glasses are a key step in the long-term behavior study of such waste forms. These rates are routinely normalized to the glass surface area in contact with solution, and experiments are very often carried out using crushed materials. Various methods have been implemented to determine the surface area of such glass powders, leading to differing values, with the notion of the reactive surface area of crushed glass remaining vague. In this study, around forty initial dissolution rate measurements were conducted following static and flow rate (SPFT, MCFT) measurement protocols at 90 °C, pH 10. The international reference glass (ISG), in the forms of powders with different particle sizes and polished monoliths, and soda-lime glass beads were examined. Although crushed glass grains clearly cannot be assimilated with spheres, it is when using the samples geometric surface (Sgeo) that the rates measured on powders are closest to those found for monoliths. Overestimation of the reactive surface when using the BET model (SBET) may be due to small physical features at the atomic scale - contributing to BET surface area but not to AFM surface area. Such features are very small compared with the thickness of water ingress in glass (a few hundred nanometers) and should not be considered in rate calculations. With a SBET/Sgeo ratio of 2.5 ± 0.2 for ISG powders, it is shown here that rates measured on powders and normalized to Sgeo should be divided by 1.3 and rates normalized to SBET should be multiplied by 1.9 in order to be compared with rates measured on a monolith. The use of glass beads indicates that the geometric surface gives a good estimation of glass reactive surface if sample geometry can be precisely described. Although data clearly shows the repeatability of measurements, results must be given with a high uncertainty of approximately ±25{\%}.",
author = "Maxime Fournier and Aur{\'e}lien Ull and Elodie Nicoleau and Yaohiro Inagaki and Micha{\"e}l Odorico and Pierre Frugier and St{\'e}phane Gin",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.028",
language = "English",
volume = "476",
pages = "140--154",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Materials",
issn = "0022-3115",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glass dissolution rate measurement and calculation revisited

AU - Fournier, Maxime

AU - Ull, Aurélien

AU - Nicoleau, Elodie

AU - Inagaki, Yaohiro

AU - Odorico, Michaël

AU - Frugier, Pierre

AU - Gin, Stéphane

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Aqueous dissolution rate measurements of nuclear glasses are a key step in the long-term behavior study of such waste forms. These rates are routinely normalized to the glass surface area in contact with solution, and experiments are very often carried out using crushed materials. Various methods have been implemented to determine the surface area of such glass powders, leading to differing values, with the notion of the reactive surface area of crushed glass remaining vague. In this study, around forty initial dissolution rate measurements were conducted following static and flow rate (SPFT, MCFT) measurement protocols at 90 °C, pH 10. The international reference glass (ISG), in the forms of powders with different particle sizes and polished monoliths, and soda-lime glass beads were examined. Although crushed glass grains clearly cannot be assimilated with spheres, it is when using the samples geometric surface (Sgeo) that the rates measured on powders are closest to those found for monoliths. Overestimation of the reactive surface when using the BET model (SBET) may be due to small physical features at the atomic scale - contributing to BET surface area but not to AFM surface area. Such features are very small compared with the thickness of water ingress in glass (a few hundred nanometers) and should not be considered in rate calculations. With a SBET/Sgeo ratio of 2.5 ± 0.2 for ISG powders, it is shown here that rates measured on powders and normalized to Sgeo should be divided by 1.3 and rates normalized to SBET should be multiplied by 1.9 in order to be compared with rates measured on a monolith. The use of glass beads indicates that the geometric surface gives a good estimation of glass reactive surface if sample geometry can be precisely described. Although data clearly shows the repeatability of measurements, results must be given with a high uncertainty of approximately ±25%.

AB - Aqueous dissolution rate measurements of nuclear glasses are a key step in the long-term behavior study of such waste forms. These rates are routinely normalized to the glass surface area in contact with solution, and experiments are very often carried out using crushed materials. Various methods have been implemented to determine the surface area of such glass powders, leading to differing values, with the notion of the reactive surface area of crushed glass remaining vague. In this study, around forty initial dissolution rate measurements were conducted following static and flow rate (SPFT, MCFT) measurement protocols at 90 °C, pH 10. The international reference glass (ISG), in the forms of powders with different particle sizes and polished monoliths, and soda-lime glass beads were examined. Although crushed glass grains clearly cannot be assimilated with spheres, it is when using the samples geometric surface (Sgeo) that the rates measured on powders are closest to those found for monoliths. Overestimation of the reactive surface when using the BET model (SBET) may be due to small physical features at the atomic scale - contributing to BET surface area but not to AFM surface area. Such features are very small compared with the thickness of water ingress in glass (a few hundred nanometers) and should not be considered in rate calculations. With a SBET/Sgeo ratio of 2.5 ± 0.2 for ISG powders, it is shown here that rates measured on powders and normalized to Sgeo should be divided by 1.3 and rates normalized to SBET should be multiplied by 1.9 in order to be compared with rates measured on a monolith. The use of glass beads indicates that the geometric surface gives a good estimation of glass reactive surface if sample geometry can be precisely described. Although data clearly shows the repeatability of measurements, results must be given with a high uncertainty of approximately ±25%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964645066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964645066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.028

M3 - Article

VL - 476

SP - 140

EP - 154

JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials

JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials

SN - 0022-3115

ER -