Has the reform of the Japanese healthcare provision system improved the value in healthcare? A cost-Consequence analysis of organized care for hip fracture patients

Haruhisa Fukuda, Sayuri Shimizu, Tatsuro Ishizaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To assess the value of organized care by comparing the clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditure between the conventional Japanese "integrated care across specialties within one hospital" mode of providing healthcare and the prospective approach of "organized care across separate facilities within a community". Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Two groups of hospitals were categorized according to healthcare delivery approach: The first group included 3 hospitals autonomously providing integrated care across specialties, and the second group included 4 acute care hospitals and 7 rehabilitative care hospitals providing organized care across separate facilities. Participants Patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone hip fracture surgery. Measurements Regression models adjusting for patient characteristics and clinical variables were used to investigate the impact of organized care on the improvements to the mobility capability of patients before and after hospitalization and the differences in healthcare resource utilization. Results The sample for analysis included 837 hip fracture surgery cases. The proportion of patients with either unchanged or improved mobility capability was not statistically associated with the healthcare delivery approaches. Total adjusted mean healthcare expenditure for integrated care and organized care were US$28,360 (95% confidence interval: 27,787-28,972) and US$21,951 (21,511-22,420), respectively, indicating an average increase of US$6,409 in organized care. Conclusion Our cost-consequence analysis underscores the need to further investigate the actual contribution of organized care to the provision of efficient and high-quality healthcare.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0133694
JournalPloS one
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 24 2015

Fingerprint

hip fractures
Hip Fractures
health services
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs
Surgery
Health Expenditures
surgery
Quality of Health Care
cohort studies
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
confidence interval
Confidence Intervals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Cite this

Has the reform of the Japanese healthcare provision system improved the value in healthcare? A cost-Consequence analysis of organized care for hip fracture patients. / Fukuda, Haruhisa; Shimizu, Sayuri; Ishizaki, Tatsuro.

In: PloS one, Vol. 10, No. 7, e0133694, 24.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{796cec9b7c964f7e8868ad1bcc13aa29,
title = "Has the reform of the Japanese healthcare provision system improved the value in healthcare? A cost-Consequence analysis of organized care for hip fracture patients",
abstract = "Objectives To assess the value of organized care by comparing the clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditure between the conventional Japanese {"}integrated care across specialties within one hospital{"} mode of providing healthcare and the prospective approach of {"}organized care across separate facilities within a community{"}. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Two groups of hospitals were categorized according to healthcare delivery approach: The first group included 3 hospitals autonomously providing integrated care across specialties, and the second group included 4 acute care hospitals and 7 rehabilitative care hospitals providing organized care across separate facilities. Participants Patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone hip fracture surgery. Measurements Regression models adjusting for patient characteristics and clinical variables were used to investigate the impact of organized care on the improvements to the mobility capability of patients before and after hospitalization and the differences in healthcare resource utilization. Results The sample for analysis included 837 hip fracture surgery cases. The proportion of patients with either unchanged or improved mobility capability was not statistically associated with the healthcare delivery approaches. Total adjusted mean healthcare expenditure for integrated care and organized care were US$28,360 (95{\%} confidence interval: 27,787-28,972) and US$21,951 (21,511-22,420), respectively, indicating an average increase of US$6,409 in organized care. Conclusion Our cost-consequence analysis underscores the need to further investigate the actual contribution of organized care to the provision of efficient and high-quality healthcare.",
author = "Haruhisa Fukuda and Sayuri Shimizu and Tatsuro Ishizaki",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0133694",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Has the reform of the Japanese healthcare provision system improved the value in healthcare? A cost-Consequence analysis of organized care for hip fracture patients

AU - Fukuda, Haruhisa

AU - Shimizu, Sayuri

AU - Ishizaki, Tatsuro

PY - 2015/7/24

Y1 - 2015/7/24

N2 - Objectives To assess the value of organized care by comparing the clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditure between the conventional Japanese "integrated care across specialties within one hospital" mode of providing healthcare and the prospective approach of "organized care across separate facilities within a community". Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Two groups of hospitals were categorized according to healthcare delivery approach: The first group included 3 hospitals autonomously providing integrated care across specialties, and the second group included 4 acute care hospitals and 7 rehabilitative care hospitals providing organized care across separate facilities. Participants Patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone hip fracture surgery. Measurements Regression models adjusting for patient characteristics and clinical variables were used to investigate the impact of organized care on the improvements to the mobility capability of patients before and after hospitalization and the differences in healthcare resource utilization. Results The sample for analysis included 837 hip fracture surgery cases. The proportion of patients with either unchanged or improved mobility capability was not statistically associated with the healthcare delivery approaches. Total adjusted mean healthcare expenditure for integrated care and organized care were US$28,360 (95% confidence interval: 27,787-28,972) and US$21,951 (21,511-22,420), respectively, indicating an average increase of US$6,409 in organized care. Conclusion Our cost-consequence analysis underscores the need to further investigate the actual contribution of organized care to the provision of efficient and high-quality healthcare.

AB - Objectives To assess the value of organized care by comparing the clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditure between the conventional Japanese "integrated care across specialties within one hospital" mode of providing healthcare and the prospective approach of "organized care across separate facilities within a community". Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Two groups of hospitals were categorized according to healthcare delivery approach: The first group included 3 hospitals autonomously providing integrated care across specialties, and the second group included 4 acute care hospitals and 7 rehabilitative care hospitals providing organized care across separate facilities. Participants Patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone hip fracture surgery. Measurements Regression models adjusting for patient characteristics and clinical variables were used to investigate the impact of organized care on the improvements to the mobility capability of patients before and after hospitalization and the differences in healthcare resource utilization. Results The sample for analysis included 837 hip fracture surgery cases. The proportion of patients with either unchanged or improved mobility capability was not statistically associated with the healthcare delivery approaches. Total adjusted mean healthcare expenditure for integrated care and organized care were US$28,360 (95% confidence interval: 27,787-28,972) and US$21,951 (21,511-22,420), respectively, indicating an average increase of US$6,409 in organized care. Conclusion Our cost-consequence analysis underscores the need to further investigate the actual contribution of organized care to the provision of efficient and high-quality healthcare.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942032306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942032306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0133694

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0133694

M3 - Article

C2 - 26208322

AN - SCOPUS:84942032306

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0133694

ER -