TY - JOUR
T1 - Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder
T2 - Evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection
AU - Yoshimitsu, Kengo
AU - Honda, Hiroshi
AU - Shinozaki, Kenji
AU - Aibe, Hitoshi
AU - Kuroiwa, Toshiro
AU - Irie, Hiroyuki
AU - Chijiiwa, Kazuo
AU - Asayama, Yoshiki
AU - Masuda, Kouji
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of helical CT as an aid in the preoperative diagnosis of the spread of carcinomas of the gallbladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed both hardcopy and soft-copy (on a monitor with multiplanar reconstruction capability) versions of helical CT scans (3-mm collimation and 3-mm reconstruction) of 21 patients who had undergone surgical resection for carcinomas of the gallbladder. The local spread of the disease was evaluated according to the TNM system, and the results were correlated to the pathologic findings. Inter- and intraobserver differences were checked with kappa statistics. Results of the consensus interpretations were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical CT. RESULTS. No significant inter- or intraobserver differences were found in any T category evaluation. The sensitivities of the hard-copy consensus interpretations in the diagnosis of T1, T2, T3, and T4 lesions were 33%, 64%, 80%, and 100%, respectively; specificities of hard-copy interpretations were 94%, 80%, 81%, and 95%, respectively. For soft-copy (monitor) consensus interpretations, the sensitivities for the diagnosis of T1, T2, T3, and T4 lesions were 33%, 73%, 80%, and 100%, respectively; the specificities of soft-copy interpretations were 94%, 80%, 88%, and 95%, respectively. Overall accuracy of the hard-copy interpretation was 83%; the overall accuracy of the soft-copy interpretation was not significantly different - 86%. CONCLUSION. Helical CT provided 83-86% accuracy in the diagnosis of the local extent of carcinomas of the gallbladder, showing acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the T2 and more advanced lesions but poor sensitivity for the T1 lesions. Use of a monitor with multiplanar reconstructions of the CT data did not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy.
AB - OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of helical CT as an aid in the preoperative diagnosis of the spread of carcinomas of the gallbladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed both hardcopy and soft-copy (on a monitor with multiplanar reconstruction capability) versions of helical CT scans (3-mm collimation and 3-mm reconstruction) of 21 patients who had undergone surgical resection for carcinomas of the gallbladder. The local spread of the disease was evaluated according to the TNM system, and the results were correlated to the pathologic findings. Inter- and intraobserver differences were checked with kappa statistics. Results of the consensus interpretations were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical CT. RESULTS. No significant inter- or intraobserver differences were found in any T category evaluation. The sensitivities of the hard-copy consensus interpretations in the diagnosis of T1, T2, T3, and T4 lesions were 33%, 64%, 80%, and 100%, respectively; specificities of hard-copy interpretations were 94%, 80%, 81%, and 95%, respectively. For soft-copy (monitor) consensus interpretations, the sensitivities for the diagnosis of T1, T2, T3, and T4 lesions were 33%, 73%, 80%, and 100%, respectively; the specificities of soft-copy interpretations were 94%, 80%, 88%, and 95%, respectively. Overall accuracy of the hard-copy interpretation was 83%; the overall accuracy of the soft-copy interpretation was not significantly different - 86%. CONCLUSION. Helical CT provided 83-86% accuracy in the diagnosis of the local extent of carcinomas of the gallbladder, showing acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the T2 and more advanced lesions but poor sensitivity for the T1 lesions. Use of a monitor with multiplanar reconstructions of the CT data did not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036062297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036062297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790423
DO - 10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790423
M3 - Article
C2 - 12130444
AN - SCOPUS:0036062297
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 179
SP - 423
EP - 428
JO - The American journal of roentgenology and radium therapy
JF - The American journal of roentgenology and radium therapy
IS - 2
ER -