Abstract
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the surgical parameters and treatment outcomes of tumor hemodynamics-based pure laparoscopic (PURE) and laparoscopy-assisted (HYBRID) hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with those of open hepatectomy. Methods: Using a prospectively collected database from 1997 to 2011, we analyzed the data of 56 consecutive cases of laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC (PURE, n = 24; HYBRID, n = 29; HALS, n = 3) from among 102 cases undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy. We employed 27 cases treated by open hepatectomy during the same period as controls. Results: PURE was associated with lesser blood loss, lower weight of the resected liver, and a shorter skin incision than HYBRID and open hepatectomy [median blood loss (mL): PURE 7, HYBRID 380, Open 450; P < 0.05]. On the other hand, HYBRID hepatectomy was associated with a longer operation time [operation time (min): HYBRID 232, Open 185; P = 0.0226]. The length of hospitalization in the cases treated by PURE and HYBRID hepatectomy was shorter than that in the cases treated by open hepatectomy [length of hospitalization (days): PURE 11, HYBRID 12, Open 17; P < 0.05]. One case each of transfusion and morbidity was recorded in this series. There was no significant difference of the overall (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the patients treated by laparoscopic and open hepatectomy (3-year OS: 100 vs. 100 %; DFS 50 vs. 62 %, respectively). Conclusions: Neither the surgical parameters nor the treatment outcomes of hemodynamics-based laparoscopic hepatectomy were inferior to those of open hepatectomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 610-617 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Surgical endoscopy |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1 2013 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
Cite this
Hepatectomy based on the tumor hemodynamics for hepatocellular carcinoma : A comparison among the hybrid and pure laparoscopic procedures and open surgery. / Kobayashi, Shogo; Nagano, Hiroaki; Marubashi, Shigeru; Kawamoto, Koichi; Wada, Hiroshi; Eguchi, Hidetoshi; Tanemura, Masahiro; Umeshita, Koji; Doki, Yuichiro; Mori, Masaki.
In: Surgical endoscopy, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.01.2013, p. 610-617.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hepatectomy based on the tumor hemodynamics for hepatocellular carcinoma
T2 - A comparison among the hybrid and pure laparoscopic procedures and open surgery
AU - Kobayashi, Shogo
AU - Nagano, Hiroaki
AU - Marubashi, Shigeru
AU - Kawamoto, Koichi
AU - Wada, Hiroshi
AU - Eguchi, Hidetoshi
AU - Tanemura, Masahiro
AU - Umeshita, Koji
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Mori, Masaki
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the surgical parameters and treatment outcomes of tumor hemodynamics-based pure laparoscopic (PURE) and laparoscopy-assisted (HYBRID) hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with those of open hepatectomy. Methods: Using a prospectively collected database from 1997 to 2011, we analyzed the data of 56 consecutive cases of laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC (PURE, n = 24; HYBRID, n = 29; HALS, n = 3) from among 102 cases undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy. We employed 27 cases treated by open hepatectomy during the same period as controls. Results: PURE was associated with lesser blood loss, lower weight of the resected liver, and a shorter skin incision than HYBRID and open hepatectomy [median blood loss (mL): PURE 7, HYBRID 380, Open 450; P < 0.05]. On the other hand, HYBRID hepatectomy was associated with a longer operation time [operation time (min): HYBRID 232, Open 185; P = 0.0226]. The length of hospitalization in the cases treated by PURE and HYBRID hepatectomy was shorter than that in the cases treated by open hepatectomy [length of hospitalization (days): PURE 11, HYBRID 12, Open 17; P < 0.05]. One case each of transfusion and morbidity was recorded in this series. There was no significant difference of the overall (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the patients treated by laparoscopic and open hepatectomy (3-year OS: 100 vs. 100 %; DFS 50 vs. 62 %, respectively). Conclusions: Neither the surgical parameters nor the treatment outcomes of hemodynamics-based laparoscopic hepatectomy were inferior to those of open hepatectomy.
AB - Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the surgical parameters and treatment outcomes of tumor hemodynamics-based pure laparoscopic (PURE) and laparoscopy-assisted (HYBRID) hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with those of open hepatectomy. Methods: Using a prospectively collected database from 1997 to 2011, we analyzed the data of 56 consecutive cases of laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC (PURE, n = 24; HYBRID, n = 29; HALS, n = 3) from among 102 cases undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy. We employed 27 cases treated by open hepatectomy during the same period as controls. Results: PURE was associated with lesser blood loss, lower weight of the resected liver, and a shorter skin incision than HYBRID and open hepatectomy [median blood loss (mL): PURE 7, HYBRID 380, Open 450; P < 0.05]. On the other hand, HYBRID hepatectomy was associated with a longer operation time [operation time (min): HYBRID 232, Open 185; P = 0.0226]. The length of hospitalization in the cases treated by PURE and HYBRID hepatectomy was shorter than that in the cases treated by open hepatectomy [length of hospitalization (days): PURE 11, HYBRID 12, Open 17; P < 0.05]. One case each of transfusion and morbidity was recorded in this series. There was no significant difference of the overall (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the patients treated by laparoscopic and open hepatectomy (3-year OS: 100 vs. 100 %; DFS 50 vs. 62 %, respectively). Conclusions: Neither the surgical parameters nor the treatment outcomes of hemodynamics-based laparoscopic hepatectomy were inferior to those of open hepatectomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875862075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875862075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-012-2499-6
DO - 10.1007/s00464-012-2499-6
M3 - Article
VL - 27
SP - 610
EP - 617
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
SN - 0930-2794
IS - 2
ER -