High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal

Shingo Fukagawa, Shuichi Matsuda, Hiromasa Miura, Ken Okazaki, Yasutaka Tashiro, Yukihide Iwamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Retention of a prosthesis represents an attractive surgical modality for the infected but well-fixed knee prosthesis because patients need to stay in bed after removal of all components. Some additional postoperative treatment would be needed, however, when treated only with débridement because of its low success rate. Methods. In this study, intraarticular antibiotic infusion into the infected joints after débridement, while retaining the implants, was performed for six well-fixed total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), one revision TKA, and five tumor megaprostheses with an average follow-up period of 47.5 months (range 20-82 months). TKA patients with a polyethylene insert or those with all exchangeable components and all polyethylene parts in tumor megaprostheses underwent device removal and thorough débridement of the soft tissues. Subsequently, new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the TKA patients. The removed metallic prostheses were resterilized and reimplanted, and new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the tumor megaprostheses patients. The wound was closed in layers after insertion of a catheter percutaneously. The patients received organism-specific intraarticular antibiotics through the catheter twice a day until the infection disappeared clinically. Results. There was no recurrence of infection in the TKA and revision TKA patients. Four of five knees treated with tumor megaprostheses exhibited recurrence of the infection. Infection was finally healed, however, in all cases by the same treatment procedure. Conclusions. Although some patients experienced recurrence of infection, successful implant salvage was achieved in all cases with the same treatment procedure. Patients do not need to stay in bed during this treatment. Therefore, this method should be considered as one of the treatment options for infected knee prostheses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-476
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Knee Prosthesis
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Prostheses and Implants
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Polyethylene
Infection
Recurrence
Neoplasms
Catheters
Prosthesis Retention
Device Removal
Therapeutics
Knee
Joints
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Fukagawa, S., Matsuda, S., Miura, H., Okazaki, K., Tashiro, Y., & Iwamoto, Y. (2010). High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 15(4), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1487-8

High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal. / Fukagawa, Shingo; Matsuda, Shuichi; Miura, Hiromasa; Okazaki, Ken; Tashiro, Yasutaka; Iwamoto, Yukihide.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 470-476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fukagawa, S, Matsuda, S, Miura, H, Okazaki, K, Tashiro, Y & Iwamoto, Y 2010, 'High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal', Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1487-8
Fukagawa, Shingo ; Matsuda, Shuichi ; Miura, Hiromasa ; Okazaki, Ken ; Tashiro, Yasutaka ; Iwamoto, Yukihide. / High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2010 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 470-476.
@article{104a6c68cdee41e29326dff1d79503cf,
title = "High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal",
abstract = "Background. Retention of a prosthesis represents an attractive surgical modality for the infected but well-fixed knee prosthesis because patients need to stay in bed after removal of all components. Some additional postoperative treatment would be needed, however, when treated only with d{\'e}bridement because of its low success rate. Methods. In this study, intraarticular antibiotic infusion into the infected joints after d{\'e}bridement, while retaining the implants, was performed for six well-fixed total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), one revision TKA, and five tumor megaprostheses with an average follow-up period of 47.5 months (range 20-82 months). TKA patients with a polyethylene insert or those with all exchangeable components and all polyethylene parts in tumor megaprostheses underwent device removal and thorough d{\'e}bridement of the soft tissues. Subsequently, new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the TKA patients. The removed metallic prostheses were resterilized and reimplanted, and new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the tumor megaprostheses patients. The wound was closed in layers after insertion of a catheter percutaneously. The patients received organism-specific intraarticular antibiotics through the catheter twice a day until the infection disappeared clinically. Results. There was no recurrence of infection in the TKA and revision TKA patients. Four of five knees treated with tumor megaprostheses exhibited recurrence of the infection. Infection was finally healed, however, in all cases by the same treatment procedure. Conclusions. Although some patients experienced recurrence of infection, successful implant salvage was achieved in all cases with the same treatment procedure. Patients do not need to stay in bed during this treatment. Therefore, this method should be considered as one of the treatment options for infected knee prostheses.",
author = "Shingo Fukagawa and Shuichi Matsuda and Hiromasa Miura and Ken Okazaki and Yasutaka Tashiro and Yukihide Iwamoto",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00776-010-1487-8",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "470--476",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Science",
issn = "0949-2658",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-dose antibiotic infusion for infected knee prosthesis without implant removal

AU - Fukagawa, Shingo

AU - Matsuda, Shuichi

AU - Miura, Hiromasa

AU - Okazaki, Ken

AU - Tashiro, Yasutaka

AU - Iwamoto, Yukihide

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Background. Retention of a prosthesis represents an attractive surgical modality for the infected but well-fixed knee prosthesis because patients need to stay in bed after removal of all components. Some additional postoperative treatment would be needed, however, when treated only with débridement because of its low success rate. Methods. In this study, intraarticular antibiotic infusion into the infected joints after débridement, while retaining the implants, was performed for six well-fixed total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), one revision TKA, and five tumor megaprostheses with an average follow-up period of 47.5 months (range 20-82 months). TKA patients with a polyethylene insert or those with all exchangeable components and all polyethylene parts in tumor megaprostheses underwent device removal and thorough débridement of the soft tissues. Subsequently, new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the TKA patients. The removed metallic prostheses were resterilized and reimplanted, and new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the tumor megaprostheses patients. The wound was closed in layers after insertion of a catheter percutaneously. The patients received organism-specific intraarticular antibiotics through the catheter twice a day until the infection disappeared clinically. Results. There was no recurrence of infection in the TKA and revision TKA patients. Four of five knees treated with tumor megaprostheses exhibited recurrence of the infection. Infection was finally healed, however, in all cases by the same treatment procedure. Conclusions. Although some patients experienced recurrence of infection, successful implant salvage was achieved in all cases with the same treatment procedure. Patients do not need to stay in bed during this treatment. Therefore, this method should be considered as one of the treatment options for infected knee prostheses.

AB - Background. Retention of a prosthesis represents an attractive surgical modality for the infected but well-fixed knee prosthesis because patients need to stay in bed after removal of all components. Some additional postoperative treatment would be needed, however, when treated only with débridement because of its low success rate. Methods. In this study, intraarticular antibiotic infusion into the infected joints after débridement, while retaining the implants, was performed for six well-fixed total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), one revision TKA, and five tumor megaprostheses with an average follow-up period of 47.5 months (range 20-82 months). TKA patients with a polyethylene insert or those with all exchangeable components and all polyethylene parts in tumor megaprostheses underwent device removal and thorough débridement of the soft tissues. Subsequently, new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the TKA patients. The removed metallic prostheses were resterilized and reimplanted, and new polyethylene inserts were implanted in the tumor megaprostheses patients. The wound was closed in layers after insertion of a catheter percutaneously. The patients received organism-specific intraarticular antibiotics through the catheter twice a day until the infection disappeared clinically. Results. There was no recurrence of infection in the TKA and revision TKA patients. Four of five knees treated with tumor megaprostheses exhibited recurrence of the infection. Infection was finally healed, however, in all cases by the same treatment procedure. Conclusions. Although some patients experienced recurrence of infection, successful implant salvage was achieved in all cases with the same treatment procedure. Patients do not need to stay in bed during this treatment. Therefore, this method should be considered as one of the treatment options for infected knee prostheses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956497069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956497069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00776-010-1487-8

DO - 10.1007/s00776-010-1487-8

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 470

EP - 476

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

SN - 0949-2658

IS - 4

ER -