Abstract
Predatory journals often prey on innocent researchers who are unaware of the threat they pose. This paper discusses what researchers can do if they unintentionally publish a paper in a predatory journal, including measures to take before submission, during peer review, and after the journal has accepted a manuscript. The specific recommendations discussed are pre-registration, pre-submission peer-review, open peer-review, topping up reviewers, post-publication peer review, open recommendation, and treatment as unrefereed. These measures may help to ensure the credibility of the article, even if it is published in a predatory journal. The present article suggests that an open and multi-layered assessment of research content enhances the credibility of all research articles, even those published in non-predatory journals. If applied consistently by researchers in various fields, the suggested measures may enhance reproducibility and promote the advancement of science.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Publications |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Business and International Management
- Communication
- Media Technology
- Computer Science Applications
- Library and Information Sciences